Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 19:21 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 19:21
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
655-705 (Hard)|   Conclusion|         
User avatar
harshnaicker
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2024
Last visit: 04 Jan 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
60
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 91
Kudos: 60
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 12:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A: Media literacy courses feels out of the scope of discussion of the argument.
Option B: This also feels out of scope.
Option C: This is a possible deduction from the given statements. But the presence of extreme words such as ALL makes it slightly less attractive.
Option D: A good direct deduction which stems from the last statement that says "political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor." Keep.
Option E: Seems out of scope of the discussion.

Option D is the best choice out of the given options.
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
User avatar
AviNFC
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
366
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 306
Kudos: 366
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 12:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information. Out of scope. No suggestion for voters given.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private. What is the right course of action is not given. out of scope.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information. what to be done for correct choice cannot be concluded.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. what needs to be done is out of scope
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals. Correct. young people can get swayed by political actors easily.

Ans E
User avatar
garhwalchinmay
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2025
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
3
Posts: 11
Kudos: 3
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 13:18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
C - follows a conclusion from the passage
User avatar
Sketchitesh
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2024
Last visit: 09 Feb 2026
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Concentration: Operations, Finance
Schools: INSEAD Jan '26 Kellogg Yale
GPA: 7.2
WE:Operations (Other)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Jan '26 Kellogg Yale
Posts: 141
Kudos: 110
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 13:25
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Public ability to judge reliability of sources is getting worse.
Young educated adults are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. Political actors will use biased outlet to sway election.
Target Audience for outlets is Young adults, Their goal is to mislead them to win elections.

Conclusion can be properly drawn

A. Suggestion but can be logically drawn from above. no mention of media literacy course. What if voters can judge information with media literacy course. Reject
B. same as above and also education curriculum doesn't necessarily prove improve the ability to judge info. Reject
C. Yes, They must learn if they want to make informed decision. How to learn is not the point. Like statement 1 and 2. Keep it
D. Out of scope, Journalism, Propagandist are unusual terms no relation to argument. Reject
E. Out of scope. Too specific, We don't know about if they tend to confuse this specific reporting. Reject

Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
User avatar
Ragnics
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2023
Last visit: 14 Apr 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 15
Kudos: 9
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 13:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
Correct answer is C because it connects 1. the fact that young people are illiterate 2. with the idea that biased media will be used to influence election 3. therefore it concludes that if they are to make informed decision, they need to learn to differentiate between reliable and no reliable sources of information
User avatar
Gmatismybestie
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2025
Last visit: 01 Aug 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: UCR '27 (S)
Schools: UCR '27 (S)
Posts: 29
Kudos: 24
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 13:57
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
A. WRONG. This one is a suggestion for a solution from the passage.
B. WRONG. This is also a suggestion about what we should have done.
C. CORRECT. Keywords: young people, voting decision, reliable and unreliable sources.
D. WRONG. The passage did not mention "propagandist."
E. WRONG. The passage did not mention about "confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals"

ANSWER: (C)
User avatar
MBAChaser123
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2024
Last visit: 25 Dec 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: United States
Schools: Broad'26 (WL) Ross '26 (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V83 DI82
GPA: 3
Schools: Broad'26 (WL) Ross '26 (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V83 DI82
Posts: 86
Kudos: 74
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 14:28
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is C.

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.

This is out of scope in so many ways.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.

This is out of scope, and the author does not suggest what "should" be done about it.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

This is correct. It can be inferred from the Statement.

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.

This is out of scope; it is too broad.

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.

The statement says, young people are more likely to do this, not that all of them do.

Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
User avatar
eshika23
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2024
Last visit: 21 Jan 2026
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Posts: 71
Kudos: 34
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 14:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
Statement Notes:
Ability to differentiate b/w reliable and unreliable source is decreasing.
Young population more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults.
Still, Political actors will use biased media to influence election in their favor.

Pre-thinking:
Conclusion may include: young people who might not understand media might not be able to differentiate between reliable and unreliable source to choose correct leader (since they use biased platforms and young people might not understand if news is accurate or is just running in favor of political party leaders who wants to win)

Lets see the answers:

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.- In real world yes this can be a good suggestion but here the argument scenario is political leader swaying for election)
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.- (Again, good in real world but this is just suggesting that it should be part of education curriculum but no words can indicate that author is against the current curriculum)
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information. (This might be the conclusion, if young audience must learn to diffentiate to make informed voting decision since leaders use bias platforms to influence and they might not have current skills to know if the info is right or wrong)
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. (Again the scenario created is not saying they dont understand jounalism they just dont want them to be influenced for voting decision)
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals. (This can also be correct but for me i feel C covers more of the premise than this)

Answer is C
User avatar
abhimaster
User avatar
Joined: 30 May 2025
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 45
Kudos: 17
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 14:55
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
If we read carefully, then statement means that the public ability to differenciate reliable and unrealiable source of info is detoriating, and currently new generation who just passed college are basically illeterate to make informed decision. But still political people will use these social media.

from this it is clear than A, B and D are totally wrong as A claims voter attend courses which is wrong. simillalry in B, it talks about education curriculam totally unrelated to what question asked.

C tells totally exact what passage wants to say.

While D and E create a total new claim of a situation so they are wrong
User avatar
SumnerSCB
User avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2025
Last visit: 08 Sep 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
22
Posts: 36
Kudos: 22
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 15:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more
I like the approach of finding 4 wrong answers. On first run A. maybe B. is a worst conclusion than A. so not B. C sounds pretty good. D hits words like journalism that weren't used which stick out. E similar issue with the words unrealistic ideals, which was not spoken about. So I went back looked at A and C and C hits on the political aspect with voting decisions. So C.
User avatar
Shin0099
User avatar
Joined: 26 Aug 2024
Last visit: 25 Sep 2025
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 442
Posts: 59
Kudos: 35
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 16:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
0

Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

Show more

The answer is C.

reasoning:
we are looking for an option, that includes both, the literacy part and the political.
otherwise the question wouldnt been answered correctly.

A) Out
B) Out
C) Hold, as we are talking about informed descisions (policy) and literacy.
D) Out
E) Out

only C holds to answer the significant informations.
User avatar
tgsankar10
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2024
Last visit: 15 Apr 2026
Posts: 281
Own Kudos:
399
 [1]
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
Posts: 281
Kudos: 399
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 17:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. This is not the conclusion drawn from the statements. This may be considered as a recommendation based on the conclusion arrived. Eliminate

B. Education curriculum is not discussed in the given statements and also the public's ability to differentiate information is not linked to their education in the given statements. Eliminate

C. To avoid falling to the trap of misinformation given by biased media controlled by political actors, many young people should make informed voting decisions. This is directly linked to their ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information Keep

D. Young people's understanding of journalism is not discussed in the argument. Not relevant. Eliminate

E. The question here is not whether the ideals of political candidates are realistic or not. Rather it is about the information spread by them through biased media. Eliminate

Answer: C
User avatar
vnar12
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 31 Mar 2026
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
32
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 51
Kudos: 32
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 17:46
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is choice (C). This answer choice directly addresses reliable vs unreliable sources of information from the first sentence, focuses on "most" young people from the young adults sentence, and describes a conclusion about voting decisions being best made by addressing the information sources. See below for why the other answer choices don't work well enough.

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
(there is no mention of the older vs younger competency levels)

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
(addresses reliable vs unreliable and education but not the voting/politics part)

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
(addresses all of the paragraph)

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. (addresses young people, generally mentions propaganda and makes the jump to politics via journalism being the main medium of information. A bit of a stretch)

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
(this seems like a plausible conclusion as well but incorrectly equates inaccurate reporting with unrealistic ideals)
User avatar
AVMachine
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2024
Last visit: 26 Mar 2026
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
154
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 190
Kudos: 154
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 18:56
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Situation: {The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse.}
Effect of Situation: {Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults.}

Resultantent: And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
Analysis: The premise talked about young voters but here its talking about general voters.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
Analysis: The educational curriculum is not faulty as per the premise.

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
Analysis: If young people are to make informed voting decisions, they must learn something; Here this sentence is addressing the shortcoming in the premise. This can be a Conclusion.

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
Analysis: No where premise talked about "propagandists"

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
Analysis: Reporting vs Ideals, not relavant.
User avatar
andreagonzalez2k
User avatar
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 26 Jul 2025
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
503
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 308
Kudos: 503
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 19:07
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
It suggests a specific action (attending courses), but the statements do not imply that this is the solution. They only describe the problem.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
It proposes making media literacy instruction mandatory in education, but while the statements note higher media illiteracy post-education, they do not support that it "should" be required, as this is prescriptive rather than inferable.

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
If young people are to make informed voting decisions—meaning decisions not unduly influenced by such biased sources—they must develop the ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable information. Since many young people are media illiterate, learning this skill is a necessary condition for informed voting. CORRECT

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
It links avoiding propaganda to understanding journalism, but the statements focus on differentiating sources generally, not journalism specifically.

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
It claims young people confuse accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals, but the statements provide no evidence for this specific confusion. They only address a general decline in differentiating sources.

IMO C
User avatar
vijayram24
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
37
Given Kudos: 209
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Technology
Schools: ISB '26 NUS
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 8.3
WE:Engineering (Technology)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: ISB '26 NUS
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
Posts: 38
Kudos: 37
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 19:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Passage talks about a situation where , young people are media illiterate and that politicians use this media to sway their votes. But the point is ,the conclusion is all about Politicians using media in their favour assuming that the veracity of the news published cannot be identified .Assumption is that young people cannot identify the veracity of news in media if they are not educated on media.

Option A,B are out of scope because it gives a wider suggestion
Option C is close but it talks about all young people. So out.
Option D accurately talks about passage.
Option E is out of scope
User avatar
Lemniscate
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
72
 [1]
Posts: 80
Kudos: 72
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 20:02
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
It proposes a solution (courses), but the argument merely diagnoses a problem. It doesn't imply specific remedies.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
It proposes a solution (curriculum changes), but the argument merely diagnoses a problem It doesn't imply specific remedies.

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
The premises directly link young people's media illiteracy with the threat of election manipulation via biased sources. Thus, for young voters to cast ballots based on facts rather than manipulation, they necessarily ("must learn") develop the ability to filter reliable from unreliable sources.

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
It replaces "differentiate reliable/unreliable sources" (the core issue) with "understanding journalism," which is narrower and unsupported.

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
It invents "confusing accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals," a specific bias never mentioned in the text.

Answer C
User avatar
quynhanhtran
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 Feb 2026
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
28
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Posts: 38
Kudos: 28
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 20:25
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion should be something about: Young people’s vulnerability in voting due to media illiteracy.

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
=> Passage stated young people are more likely to be media illiterate and political actors will use biased sources => So if they are to vote well, they must learn to differentiate. => CORRECT

The rest are unsupported by passage.

Answer: C
User avatar
LunaticMaestro
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2023
Last visit: 17 Feb 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Posts: 44
Kudos: 26
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 20:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
public consists of; early young adults (early 20's) and older adults.

young adults: (YA)
- have formal education
- still media illiterate

older adults: (OA)
- lesser illiterate to distinguish reliable vs unreliable
- casts votes

Intermediate conclusion: Although OA is lesser illiterate than YA, the policitians sway elections in their favour
---

Evaluating choices:

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
> not helpful since YA has recently attended education and yet worse in interpretation.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
> same as (A)

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
> Contender choice: cuz it may be the case that YA may be in majority to cast election than OA.

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
> very general opinion

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
> new opinion being introduced.
User avatar
RedYellow
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Posts: 80
Kudos: 74
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2025 (Day 2): The publics ability to differentiate 01 Jul 2025, 20:47
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
It prescribes educational reforms, but the argument describes a problem, not a solution.

B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
Same as in A, the argument describes a problem, not a solution.

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
If informed voting requires resisting manipulation, and resisting manipulation requires source-discernment skills, then young voters cannot make informed choices without these skills.

D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
It substitutes "journalism understanding" for the text's "source differentiation". It is a misalignment of concepts.

E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
It alleges idealistic misinterpretations, while the text cites inability to judge credibility. It is an unsupported claim.

Correct answer is C
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
494 posts
bhanu29
358 posts