Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
10 Jul 2025, 08:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. This talks about the frequency of truck usage, which doesn't affect the argument.
B. A 'Yes' to this strengthens the plan, suggesting they will be able to reduce delivery time. A 'No' to this weakens the plan by showing that no matter how many trucks are there, delivery times can't be reduced. Let's keep it
C. Talks about an alternate plan, which is not the subject of the question.
D. The question is whether we can reduce the delivery times by redirecting trucks to where they are needed more. So, just having idle trucks doesn't help us evaluate if we can reduce delivery times.
E. This again doesn't affect the argument.
Option B.
B. A 'Yes' to this strengthens the plan, suggesting they will be able to reduce delivery time. A 'No' to this weakens the plan by showing that no matter how many trucks are there, delivery times can't be reduced. Let's keep it
C. Talks about an alternate plan, which is not the subject of the question.
D. The question is whether we can reduce the delivery times by redirecting trucks to where they are needed more. So, just having idle trucks doesn't help us evaluate if we can reduce delivery times.
E. This again doesn't affect the argument.
Option B.
Bunuel
10 Jul 2025, 21:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Bunuel bb
The premise suggests that
"For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood."
In Option B, I'm directly contradicting the premise by saying
Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This was the only reason I couldn't come to choose this one. Had the word "currently" not been there I would have been happy to choose it.
Thoughts are welcome.
10 Jul 2025, 21:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Same thing here. I've discarded that option because of this apparently inconsistency
sanjitscorps18
