Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:28 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
lvillalon
Joined: 29 Jun 2025
Last visit: 25 Aug 2025
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: Chile
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3,3
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BeachStudy
Joined: 30 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 61
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Suyash1331
Joined: 01 Jul 2023
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
61
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q65 V70 DI70
GMAT 1: 250 Q20 V34
GPA: 7
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q65 V70 DI70
GMAT 1: 250 Q20 V34
Posts: 118
Kudos: 61
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Prathu1221
Joined: 19 Jun 2025
Last visit: 20 Jul 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 62
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option B would be the appropriate choice because the intention is to reduce delivery time. So if really it will affect then only we should implement the plan.
Option A says that when demand is more, if company uses their trucks or other ones.
Option C says that using company's trucks lead to short delivery times. This is also not related.
D says about idle trucks, this could be a solution to divert the idle trucks but it will be of use only when the potential is utilized.
E talks about recording the schedule. It will not help achieve the result.
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Abhiswarup
Joined: 07 Apr 2024
Last visit: 08 Sep 2025
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
154
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Posts: 178
Kudos: 154
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.


The passage says about truck handling of a large retailer. It says that to improve delivery time , truck assignment shall be done by neighbouring hub as the neighbourhoods depended on trucks more intensively shall use more trucks thereby decreasing the delivery time.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following? Lets analyze options

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
This will not help as it talks about present utilization of the trucks. Eliminate
(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This can be useful as it will help in assessing whether more trucks will reduce delivery time. Keep this option
(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
There was no mention of outsourcing outside scope. Eliminate
(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
This will again not help this only tells about idle trucks whether time will improve. Eliminate
(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
Again out of scope and irrelevant. Eliminate

Correct answer is B.
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
5,509
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,509
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks.
For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood.
To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods.
The argument is not concerned with shipping deadlines but about trading truck assignments with neighborhood hubs.
Incorrect

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
The argument is not concerned with delivery times but about trading truck assignments with neighborhood hubs.
Incorrect

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
The argument is not concerned with outsourcing to third-party carriers but about trading truck assignments with neighborhood hubs.
Incorrect

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
If certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day, then trading truck assignments with neighborhood hubs is possible otherwise it is not possible to do the same.
Correct

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
The argument is not concerned with how to record truck-trading activities but about checking useful of trading truck assignments with neighborhood hubs.
Incorrect

IMO D
User avatar
DataGuyX
Joined: 23 Apr 2023
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Posts: 107
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sentence 1) "A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. "
Sentence 2) "For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood."
Sentence 3) "To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. "
Sentence 4) "Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company."

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

Intended result:

by (S3): "To shorten overall delivery times"
by (S4): "reducing average delivery time across the company."

To achieve:

by (S3): "let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely."
by (S4): "trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively"

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
It is not really useful for us. Tighter deadlines could be independent from volume. Wrong answer.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
"currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks", looking at (S2) we can check that "each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks", so this is not useful. Wrong answer.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
This is not related. We are discussing whether we can achieve the intended results with the actual proposed plan, not with an external plan. Wrong answer.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
This sounds great. If we do not have idle trucks, it's very unlike that the plan could have effect. If we have idle trucks, on the other hand, it can be feasible to achieve the desired results.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
Not related. Wrong answer.

Answer = D
User avatar
SaanjK26
Joined: 08 Oct 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
Posts: 77
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Correct.
If hubs with tighter deadlines don’t actually use trucks more, trading won’t improve delivery times. This directly tests if truck trading targets true high-demand areas.

(B)
Shows if more trucks lead to shorter delivery times in intensive hubs, but doesn’t prove trading reallocates trucks effectively.

(C)
Compares own trucks vs. outsourcing—irrelevant to truck trading between hubs. Does not affect the plan’s logic.

(D)
Idle trucks imply inefficiency, but doesn’t reveal if trucks will be better used after trading. Indirectly related but insufficient.

(E)
Focuses on record-keeping, which doesn’t impact whether trading reduces delivery times. Operational, not strategic.

Answer: option (A).
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 637
Own Kudos:
623
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 637
Kudos: 623
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Intended result = Trading trucks will shorten average delivery times across the company

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
--> Frequency of truck use is not relevant. A Yes/No to this can show whether the management's observation is correct or not.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
--> All neighborhoods have the same number of trucks hence not correct

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
--> This comparison is not discussed

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
--> Correct. Yes would be a necessary for the plan to work. No would mean the plan cannot take off.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
--> Recording is not the issue at hand

Option D
User avatar
vnandan2001
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 25
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To evaluate whether the truck-trading plan will reduce average delivery times, we need to know if allowing hubs to redistribute trucks will actually improve delivery efficiency, especially in areas that need trucks the most.

Only options D and B make sense. Rest are irrelevant.
(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
This might support the idea of trading, but doesn’t tell us whether delivery time will improve.
Partial help, but not the most critical info.
Not the best answer.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This directly addresses the key issue:

Does more intensive truck use lead to shorter delivery times (and possibly justify giving those hubs more trucks)?
If yes, then reallocating more trucks to these hubs (via trading) is likely to reduce overall delivery time.
This helps evaluate the plan's effectiveness.

Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Tanabhumi
Joined: 29 Apr 2025
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 21
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was deciding between options A and B, since both clearly indicate that help is needed. Option A focuses on meeting a tighter deadline, while option B is more about achieving the goal in a shorter time frame. I ultimately chose A because it seemed to show a greater need for help. However, if the question is about testing the plan itself, then option B might be a better fit.
User avatar
tgsankar10
Joined: 27 Mar 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 281
Own Kudos:
390
 [1]
Given Kudos: 83
Location: India
Posts: 281
Kudos: 390
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal: To shorten the average delivery time across the company

Plan: Let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely

This means that some hubs can get more trucks than current allotment. Will more trucks means shorter delivery times?

(A) This tells about the intensity and frequency of the truck usage by neighborhood hubs. This is not evaluating the impact on delivery times. Eliminate

(B) This directly will give answer to the question we are having. Whether more trucks lead to shorter delivery times. Correct

(C) Third-party carriers is not related to the plan being proposed by the company. Eliminate

(D) This is the plan of company to utilize idle trucks. But whether these idle trucks contribute to shorter delivery times is not clear. Eliminate

(E) These data will not provide a clear prediction on plan's outcome. Eliminate

Answer: B
User avatar
MinhChau789
Joined: 18 Aug 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 132
Kudos: 140
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal: To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
The deadline itself isn't sufficient to conclude. Maybe there are more trucks in those neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This is the answer. If neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively cannot achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks, then the trade plan wouldn't give the intended result

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
Irrelevant

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
The plan is focusing on "neighborhoods that rely on trucks most intensively". So even neighborhood hubs that don't have idle trucks but use trucks NOT intensively, the plan still works. So this is not really relevant

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
Irrelevant
User avatar
Globethrotter
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 25
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
[Yes, knowing this will help as knowing the relation between delivery times and truck usage will help us gauge whether providing more truck to tighter deadline hubs will improve them or not. Tighter deadline hubs can then improve provided they have more trucks, by achieving more concurrency and thus reducing frequency of use of trucks]

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
[This seems correct at first, but it is given that currently same number of trucks are present in every hub. So it makes the statement a bit hazy that there are more trucks in hubs that use trucks more intensively.]

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
[Straight away out of scope, eliminated]

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
[This might seem helpful, but we don't have the details of how the trucks are used exactly. For example, if a driver takes a small load, but delivers each parcel in a leisurely fashion it might look like no free trucks so heavy usage, but not the reality. So idle trucks need not be a necessary condition to trade the trucks.]

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
[Straight away out of scope, eliminated ]
User avatar
D3N0
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 587
Own Kudos:
572
 [1]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 587
Kudos: 572
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans : B

A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood.
Why? = To shorten overall delivery times,
Plan senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely.
Reasoning: Trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.


To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?
We need to select an option that shows that the plan will achieve its intended outcome.
We need to find a relationship that shows that truck usage will improve the efficiency and reduce the delivery time across the company.

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
frequency of truck usage and tighter shipping deadlines doesn't say if there is an impact on the delivery time.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This says that those hubs that are using trucks more intensively are achieving shorter delivery times due to having more trucks, this actually in line with the reasoning given (Correct)

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
argument did not mention the impact of the ownership of the trucks on the efficiency or delivery time. Third party is not part of the discussion here.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
this statement doesn't show the impact of the idle trucks, if traded, on the delivery time.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
Recording the activity is not part of the given argument and this statement shows no relationshio between the recording the activity with the impact on delivery time.
User avatar
IIIJOHNNYSIII
Joined: 10 Aug 2023
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 85
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Type : Evaluate
Statement : Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods - There is nothing mentioned about deadlines and the main point is to analyze if the proposal with "reduce average delivery times"

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks - This directly would help us evaluate the effectiveness of the plan proposed by the managers and is the correct option.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers - There is nothing mentioned about the ownership of trucks

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day - While this would help us evaluate if the plan is feasible, it would not give us information on whether the proposed plan would "reduce average delivery times"

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system - This is irrelevant to the question.

Correct option is Option B
User avatar
shaliny
Joined: 30 Oct 2023
Last visit: 24 Oct 2025
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 712
Products:
Posts: 99
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A- argument is not based on the frequency of using trucks. It is talking about to reduce delivery time by increasing more trucks - irrelevant
B-our concern is that plan will work or not. it is not asking for the need of plan. This option if true , will completely remove the plan so this is not evaluating what we need. eliminated
C-management plans to let N. hubs trade trucks assignments freely, so if this option is yes then plan is not working and if NO, means plan is working so i think this option will help to evaluate- keep it
D-no idea about idle truck- eliminated
E- irrelevant
option C
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
SRIVISHUDDHA22
Joined: 08 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 275
Location: India
Schools: ISB '26
GPA: 9
Products:
Schools: ISB '26
Posts: 88
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-ltwx8761.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-ltwx8761.png [ 213.37 KiB | Viewed 178 times ]
User avatar
Rahilgaur
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Posts: 104
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?
(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
- whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently or not - it doesn't tell whether using more trucks help to reduce the average delivery time.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks - Correct
-If yes - utilizing other trucks may help in achieving shorter delivery time.
-No - If neighborhood doesn't use truck more intensively to achieve the shorter delivery time than the proposed solution won't help to achieve shorter delivery time.


(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
-third party carriers Not relevant to the proposed solution.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
-if certain neighborhood hubs doesn't have idle trucks, sharing of trucks where it is required won't possible hence reducing the time won't possible.
- if yes- idle trucks can be assigned where required however whether availability of trucks will help in reducing delivery time is still a question.


(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
- Recording truck-activity is not relevant to achieve the proposed solution.
User avatar
Lemniscate
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Posts: 80
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
It doesn't directly address whether reallocating trucks will reduce average delivery times. Even if they use trucks more, trading might not help if the trucks are already optimally used.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
This directly addresses whether having more trucks leads to shorter delivery times. If yes, then reallocating more trucks to such hubs would reduce average delivery time, that is exactly the intended result of the plan.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
This is about outsourcing vs using own trucks, which is irrelevant to the plan.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
This could show inefficiency or imbalance but it doesn't tell us whether reallocating would reduce delivery times overall.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
This is about implementation, not about whether the plan will work. Irrelevant to evaluating the plan's effectiveness.

Answer B
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts