Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Mohak01
Joined: 05 Sep 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
64
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q83 V87 DI83
GPA: 8
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q83 V87 DI83
Posts: 104
Kudos: 64
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
885
 [1]
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 885
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bart08241192
Joined: 03 Dec 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
64
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 75
Kudos: 64
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Raome
Joined: 21 Apr 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
Posts: 109
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Correct answer is (B).

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks


Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Ryga
Joined: 12 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Aug 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q90 V80 DI83
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q90 V80 DI83
Posts: 68
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The company's goal is to reduce average delivery time by letting hubs trade trucks.
This will only help if some hubs have more trucks than they need (i.e., idle trucks),
and others have too few (high demand, long delivery times).
So, the most helpful thing to know is:
Are there idle trucks in some hubs that could be better used elsewhere?
That’s exactly what choice (D) tells us.

Other Options:
(A) Talks about deadlines, not truck usage or availability.
(B) Talks about hubs already having more trucks — but all hubs currently have the same number.
(C) Outsourcing vs. in-house is not relevant here.
(E) Tracking truck trades is useful for operations, but not for evaluating if the plan will work.
avatar
spvdrrooo
Joined: 20 Aug 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: Belgium
Products:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system



Evaluate question

A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

Conclusion : plan to shorten delivery times by trading truck assignments freely between hubs will work => more trucks will move to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensly

Assuming that trucks will be free to be moved to these neighborhoods.

What information could evaluate the argument ?

Answer (A) => does not evaluate the proposed plan (irrelevant)

Answer (B) => does not give information to evaluate the proposed plan, goes about current usage of trucks not the plan to re-assign.

Answer (C) => proposes another plan next to the proposed plan in the argument (no tie to the argument)

Answer (D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day => would be information that can help to evaluate if the plan would work => if no trucks are available to be assigned to another neigborhood => the plan to maximise efficiancy = reduce delivery time , would not work. If there would be trucks available to be assigned => than the plan would be more likely to work.

Answer (E) to narrow detail that does not help to evaluate the overall proposed plan.


Answer D
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods— even then trading trucks might become more beneficial provided the current system is inefficient

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks— they might achieve shorter times but it doesn’t help evaluate whether trading trucks will help

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers— third party vs own trucks has no relevance to whether trading trucks will reduce delivery times

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day— this is relevant. If some have less and others have more then trading will help

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system—- doesn’t tell us anything about efficacy of trading trucks

Ans D
User avatar
LucasH20
Joined: 13 Apr 2023
Last visit: 31 Aug 2025
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 384
Posts: 52
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods.
This just tells us who's busy right now because they have tight deadlines. But knowing that doesn't tell us if giving them more trucks will actually make things faster.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks.
The whole idea is that if you give more trucks to the really busy neighborhoods, things will speed up. So, we need to know: Does that actually happen already? If places that are busy and already have more trucks (or effectively more capacity) don't get faster deliveries, then this plan is probably a not having the expected outcome.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers.
This choice gives us the possibility of another plan, these choices will almost always be wrong, because we want to evaluate this plan not if there are even better plans possible.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day.
This is useful because it tells us, that there are extra trucks available to be moved. But knowing there are idle trucks doesn't tell us if moving them will actually make deliveries faster overall.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system.
This choice is about how they'll keep track of the swapping. It has nothing to do with whether the swapping itself will actually make deliveries faster.

Regards,
Lucas

Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
APram
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 671
Own Kudos:
263
 [1]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
GPA: 3.608
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
Posts: 671
Kudos: 263
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Trading -> more trucks that rely on them intensively -> reduced average delivery time

In evaluate type question, we need to do Yes / No test to eliminate wrong ans or choose right ans

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
If neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods, delivering more trucks will lead to reduced delivery time
If neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently do not use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods, then delivering more trucks will be useless.
Keep this option.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
If neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks then by delivering more trucks will further reduce delivery time
If neighborhood hubs currently not using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks then more trucks will be useless.
Lets keep this option

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
Effective usage of truck and outsourcing to third party is irrelevant

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
This choice is also irrelevant to evaluate

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
Whether recording the truck or not will not do anything to the argument. There is no impack

So out of A and B evaluating B directly evaluates usage and intensity of trucks
So B is better option

Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Harika2024
Joined: 27 Jul 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 80
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's check the given options:

(A) Whether neighbourhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighbourhoods

This tells us about how they're using trucks now, but not if having more trucks would actually help them deliver faster or if there are trucks available to move. They might be using them frequently but still be very slow because they don't have enough.

(B) Whether neighbourhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

If they already deliver faster (which isn't really possible if they have the same number of trucks and are just busy), then moving more trucks to them might not help much. The core question is whether giving more trucks to busy places will improve their times, not if busy places are currently fast.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

This is about a completely different way of doing deliveries. The plan is about making the current system of company-owned trucks more efficient, not switching to a new system.

(D) Whether certain neighbourhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

If some branches have trucks sitting idle, it means those trucks are wasted. The plan is about "trading." If there are idle trucks, those are the trucks that can be moved to the busy branches without causing problems for the quiet branches (because they weren't using them anyway). If there are no idle trucks anywhere, then moving a truck from one branch means that branch will lose a truck, which might make their deliveries slower, potentially just shifting the problem or making things worse overall. Knowing if there are idle trucks tells us if there's actually "extra" capacity that can be redeployed to make the overall system better.

(E) Whether neighbourhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

This is about how the plan will be managed and tracked, not whether the plan itself will actually lead to faster deliveries. It's about record-keeping, not direct impact on delivery times.

Therefore to know if the plan will work, we need to know if there are trucks that can actually be moved without creating new problems. If some branches have idle cars, then moving those cars to busy branches makes sense and could actually improve overall delivery times.

The most helpful information is (D) Whether certain neighbourhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day.
User avatar
chasing725
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 17 Aug 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 85
Kudos: 81
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

Goal: Reduce average delivery time across the company.
Plan: Move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively

So, the unstated assumption is that the company has trucks that it can move to neighborhood that rely on them most intensively.

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

This information is irrelevant and out of scope. Eliminate Option A.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

The evaluation of delivery time is not in scope. We can eliminate B.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

The plan is around moving the company's truck. Hence, alternative plan is not in scope. Eliminate C.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

This is in line with the assumption. We are assuming that there are idle or available trucks that can be moved. Hence, keep C.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

Irrelevant and out of scope to the goal. We can eliminate E.

Option D
User avatar
Dereno
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 744
Own Kudos:
739
 [1]
Given Kudos: 374
Products:
Posts: 744
Kudos: 739
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

A larger retailer operates a LIMITED number of fleets of Same day delivery trucks. The number of delivery trucks in the neighbourhood is always the same, irrespective of the volume of the consignment that needs to be delivered.

To shorten delivery times, the management came up with a plan that the neighbourhood hubs freely trade trucks among themselves. So, when a region needs a truck more intensely , the trade from the neighbourhood hubs have led to average decrease in the delivery time.

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods.

If the hub which needs trucks more than the neighbouring hubs, then they use a lot of trucks. If on the contrary, if the hubs use less trucks then the average time falls down. Hence, not sufficient to evaluate the question.


(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

If the neighbourhood hubs using trucks intensively achieve shorter delivery times, then the average time reduces drastically. The main crux of the problem is to use intensive trucks thereby reducing the delivery times. Hence right option to evaluate the question.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

Outsourcing to third party is not relevant for this question. Hence, eliminated .

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

Having idle trucks vs trucks used intensively to reduce delivery time. This is not needed to evaluate the question.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

This is completely irrelevant.

Option B
User avatar
MBAChaser123
Joined: 19 Nov 2024
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: United States
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V83 DI82
GPA: 3
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V83 DI82
Posts: 86
Kudos: 74
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

The answer to this question does not necessarily weaken or strengthen the argument. If they are using the trucks more frequently, having more trucks might not shorten the time. Having 20 shipments on one truck, or 1 shipment on 20 trucks, is not gonna change the time.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

Well, this option contradicts the premise. We already know they all have the same number of trucks.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

This is out of scope and therefore irrelevant. The argument is not about the company's truck or the third party's truck; it's about whether the number of trucks in a neighborhood affects the delivery time.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

This is the perfect answer. If there is no idle truck in any neighborhood, then there is no ground for the argument to begin with. But if there are any idle trucks, there could be a neighborhood that can use the extra truck if needed.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

This is not relevant. Whether they record the schedule or not, it has nothing to do with delivery time.

The answer is D.

Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
vnar12
Joined: 03 Jun 2024
Last visit: 26 Aug 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
32
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 51
Kudos: 32
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is (D)

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods
(the frequency is not logically important when the claim is for a reduction in delivery times)

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks
(this answer seems like it could be relevant as it talks about delivery times but it just restates the claim/reasoning behind the claim)

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers
(this introduces a different situation where there are third party trucks when the claim is only about the trading of existing company trucks)

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day
(this would strengthen the company's claim as idle trucks in some neighborhoods hub would be very useful if they are able to be traded to other hubs that need it)

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system
(this answer choice is unrelated, it mentions truck trades but then discusses an unrelated scheduling system instead of changes in delivery times)
User avatar
missionmba2025
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 07 Sep 2025
Posts: 341
Own Kudos:
427
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Posts: 341
Kudos: 427
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 



(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

INCORRECT: The reason for sending more trucks is irrelevant. We can eliminate A.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

INCORRECT: The information is out of scope to the conclusion. Eliminate B.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

INCORRECT: The ask in the argument is not to outsource trucks. We can eliminate C.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

CORRECT: To evaluate the conclusion of the retailer it would be worth knowing whether we have idle tracks that we can re-route. If not, the conclusion doesn't work.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

INCORRECT: The plan doesn't need to make entry anywhere. So, we can eliminate E.

Option D
User avatar
kvaishvik24
Joined: 31 Mar 2025
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 81
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Goal is More trucks go to the hubs that need them most, which will shorten overall delivery time.

Assumption: Hubs that use trucks more intensively will benefit from having more trucks, reducing ddelivery time.

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

It talks about deadlines, but doesn't tell us whether giving more trucks to busy hubs will reduce delivery time.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

If hubs with more trucks and high usage have shorter delivery times, then reallocating more trucks to high-demand hubs may achieve the goal.

.
(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

Irrelevant to the internal truck-trading plan, talks about third party.


(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

It does not tell us whether reallocating those trucks will improve overall delivery times.


(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

Irrelevant,Has no relation on whether delivery times will improve.
User avatar
muuss
Joined: 10 Aug 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q84 V81 DI76
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q84 V81 DI76
Posts: 108
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods-we do not know about the delivery times only the frequency wouldnt help
(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks-correct , if neighborhood trucks get benefit from more trucks then the managements concern is correct
(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers-irrelevant
(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day-we dont know if this would hep reduce time
(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system-nothing about the reduction in delivery time so again irrelevant
IMO:B
User avatar
AVMachine
Joined: 03 May 2024
Last visit: 26 Aug 2025
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
154
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 190
Kudos: 154
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. (Some may be overloaded, and some may be underloaded) To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

They can increase the frequency or they can increase the loading capacity, which may result in slower speed. Not a clear answer.

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

Intensively can mean frequency or loading also, and here, its effect is also talked about. Answer.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

Here argument is not changing the number of trucks, irrelevant.

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

This has already been talked about in the passage. irrelevant.

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system

Doesn't change the evaluation. irrelevant.
User avatar
dragobreathfire
Joined: 05 Jul 2025
Last visit: 14 Aug 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Location: India
GPA: 7.5
Posts: 34
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A large retailer operates a limited fleet of same-day-delivery trucks. For years, each neighborhood delivery hub has been assigned the same number of trucks, regardless of the daily order volume in that neighborhood. To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely. Management argues that trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

Option A seems to be a good answer but it does not tell how it will actually help to acheive the intended goal. Unlike, Option B: (B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks

It effectively tells if using more trucks are helping some neighourhood achieve lowering delivery time.

So, Option B is correct.
User avatar
Nitish1103
Joined: 10 Jul 2022
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q84 V81 DI83
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q84 V81 DI83
Posts: 18
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Plan - To shorten overall delivery times, senior management now plans to let neighborhood hubs trade truck assignments freely.

Intended Result -Trading will move more trucks to the neighborhoods that rely on them most intensively, thereby reducing average delivery time across the company.

Assumption : Moving more trucks in certain areas will reduce the average delivery time.

To evaluate whether the company’s plan is likely to achieve its intended result, it would be most helpful to know which of the following?

(A) Whether neighborhood hubs facing tighter shipping deadlines currently use their trucks more frequently than other neighborhoods - What's currently going on should not matter to us to evaluate the success of a plan. Whether they use their trucks more or less frequently does not help us determine that what will happen if they start using more trucks. Eliminate

(B) Whether neighborhood hubs currently using trucks more intensively achieve shorter delivery times due to having more trucks - Correct. The plan that having more trucks will lead to shorter delivery times, will need to some proof that that the cause and effect is actually proved to be working. If the hubs using more trucks are NOT able to achieve the shorter time, then moving more trucks won't lead to the result intended. If doing 'some X' is not leading to 'some Y'. How can doing more of X' will lead to Y. Keep.

(C) Whether using the company’s own trucks reduces delivery time more effectively than outsourcing to third-party carriers - Out of scope. We are not looking for 'More Effective' solution. We are evaluating the success of a plan. Eliminate

(D) Whether certain neighborhood hubs currently have idle trucks at any point during the day - This one's tricky. But my thinking is that even if we don't have idle trucks currently, we don't know what will happen when the truck assignments are traded freely. Perhaps once free trading of assignments start, There might be some smart planning and that will lead to some trucks becoming idle that were not idle before. Or Perhaps it won't. In any case, this information will not be the 'Most Helpful' option we are looking for. Eliminate

(E) Whether neighborhood hubs will be required to record truck-trading activity in a central scheduling system - Irrelevant. 'Central Scheduling system?', Even if not recorded in Central Scheduling system, what if they are recording in individual hub's scheduling system. Perhaps they communicate to each other verbally and do some year end reconciliation. New data that needs quite some assumptions itself. Eliminate.

Hence the answer according to me would be B.
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts