Last visit was: 08 Sep 2026, 16:53 It is currently 08 Sep 2026, 16:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
puncuz
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
16
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 27
Kudos: 16
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shlok02
Joined: 08 Jan 2024
Last visit: 08 Sep 2026
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
41
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 41
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Manosij010
Joined: 18 Feb 2026
Last visit: 08 Sep 2026
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Location: India
GPA: 5.72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
firefox300
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Posts: 151
Kudos: 140
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Strengthen
Statement 1 best strengthens the argument because it supplies real world proofs that congestion pricing achieves the environmental and traffic objectives identified by the mayor.

Weaken
Statement 5 best weakens the argument because it shows congestion pricing can increase neighborhood traffic and accident risk by rerouting drivers away from tolled areas.
User avatar
sunshineeee
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 267
Location: Indonesia
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: The Mayor prefers CP (Congestion Pricing) over TC (Traffic Calming) as solution for traffic management
Arguments
1. CP -> charges a fee -> incentivizes the use of public transport / off-peak travel + reduction of carbon emission -> efficient management of large-scale urban gridlock
2. LC benefits on safety and livability at the neighborhood level have little effect on regional traffic volume

Missing link/assumption
- If CP charges a fee -> influences use of public transport. How if it influences side effect / increase traffic in non-fee track?

The possible answer
1. Strengthen -> Statement 1
Why? 80% of urban air pollution originates from regional commuters. Working on CP can solve this issue of pollution.

2. Weakening -> Statement 5
Why? Traffic displacement, which implication of the policy, weakens the conclusion. The assumption that there are no side effects of implementing a higher fee is attacked and weakens the conclusion.

Why others might be wrong
S2 -> irrelevant. Building more lanes not aligned with the arguments stated
S3 -> irrelevant. idling cars in heavy gridlock is not aligned with the argument's assumption
S4 -> irrelevant. Comparing the safety of pedestrians and reductions of urban congestion is not aligned with the arguments.
Bunuel
City C is considering two urban planning concepts for traffic management: traffic calming and congestion pricing. Traffic calming involves physical design changes to streets, such as speed bumps, roundabouts, and curb extensions, that are intended to slow vehicles and improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists. In contrast, congestion pricing is a market-based strategy that charges drivers a fee to enter high-traffic zones during peak hours, aiming to reduce the total volume of cars by incentivizing the use of public transit or off-peak travel. Although traffic calming would likely increase safety and livability at a neighborhood level, the mayor asserts that it does little to reduce regional traffic volume, so she favors congestion pricing for its reduction of carbon emissions and efficient management of large-scale urban gridlock.

Select Strengthen for the statement that would, if true, most strengthen the mayor’s position, and select Weaken for the statement that would, if true, most weaken the mayor’s position. Make only two selections, one in each column.
User avatar
Mardee
Joined: 22 Nov 2022
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
248
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 286
Kudos: 248
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets understand the passage to come to the solutions
Mayor agrees that traffic calming improves area safety and livability but doesent help reduce traffic volume
Thus, she prefers congestion pricing as the alternative
This basically reduces carbon emission and efficiently manages large scale urban gridlocks
Thus she is saying that congestion pricing is the better option for her requirements.

Strengthen -> Statement 1

This data from similar citites proves the mayor's point regarding reduced emission and gridlock management through the usage of congestion pricing. It supports it and strengthens her position

Weaken -> Statement 5

This statement is saying that congestion pricing doesent resolve congestion completely, but just moves the gridlocks to neighborhoods which increases congestion and also causes an increase in accident possibilities.
This statement weakens the mayor's position the strongest when compared to the other statments.
avatar
niteshmotwani
Joined: 09 Nov 2025
Last visit: 08 Sep 2026
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 224
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CR strenght and weaken so

A - strength bcz other example supports
E - weaken here it oppose and weaken it

So this is my reasoning


Bunuel
City C is considering two urban planning concepts for traffic management: traffic calming and congestion pricing. Traffic calming involves physical design changes to streets, such as speed bumps, roundabouts, and curb extensions, that are intended to slow vehicles and improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists. In contrast, congestion pricing is a market-based strategy that charges drivers a fee to enter high-traffic zones during peak hours, aiming to reduce the total volume of cars by incentivizing the use of public transit or off-peak travel. Although traffic calming would likely increase safety and livability at a neighborhood level, the mayor asserts that it does little to reduce regional traffic volume, so she favors congestion pricing for its reduction of carbon emissions and efficient management of large-scale urban gridlock.

Select Strengthen for the statement that would, if true, most strengthen the mayor’s position, and select Weaken for the statement that would, if true, most weaken the mayor’s position. Make only two selections, one in each column.
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
Math Expert
113269 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts