Last visit was: 09 Jun 2026, 13:57 It is currently 09 Jun 2026, 13:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
WA@boj6690
User avatar
WhatsApp Bridge
Joined: 28 Jan 2025
Last visit: 24 Oct 2025
Posts: 37,837
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,837
Kudos: 1,875
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GunPk
Joined: 19 May 2026
Last visit: 09 Jun 2026
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chawlach9
Joined: 28 Jan 2024
Last visit: 09 Jun 2026
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Posts: 39
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WA@boj6690
User avatar
WhatsApp Bridge
Joined: 28 Jan 2025
Last visit: 24 Oct 2025
Posts: 37,837
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,837
Kudos: 1,875
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This post came through our private GMAT Club WhatsApp Group.
Join the WhatsApp Community or Log in to view the full message.
User avatar
Bubbasch
Joined: 15 Nov 2024
Last visit: 09 Jun 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Products:
Posts: 44
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

*GunPk writes:*
> *Bubbasch writes:*
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm struggling a lot with Critical Reasoning (CR). Could anyone share some tips or strategies that helped you improve and overcome difficulties in CR?
> I absolutely recommend Powerscore CR Bible and GMAT Ninja CR series (especially 2026 series; Episode 2 is my favourite though because Charles clearly explains why negation and pre-thinking/pre-phrasing doesn’t always work especially when solving medium/hard CR questions). CR Bible is absolutely the killer and my understanding completely changed after going through each and every chapter thoroughly in detail. If my understanding of any of the concepts mentioned in the chapters is not exactly how it has to be understood/comprehended, I used Gemini Flash 3.5 (Extended Thinking, this is a free version and has enough token size and wouldn’t get exahusted even if you solve 1000 questions in a day) to make me understand it clearly and generate GMAT Focus style questions something like a 10 question drill for each chapter and solved them. At the end of the each chapter in CR Bible, you’ll see a mini drill with actual GMAT style questions and answers along with the explanations. I asked Gemini to generate something similar and it used to do that and I solve them till I answer every question correctly. There is no limit/fear of exhaustion of questions (although they are not official questions) with this approach because it can generate any number of questions on that particular concept. The main point/objective to do this drill is to ensure that the concept is understood correctly and deeply ingrained. Once that’s done, you can try the hands-on on the OG questions. Again, the reason to do this rigorous exercise is to ensure that concepts are understood correctly and able to apply them perfectly beforehand and not directly applying them on OG questions and exhausting them. Post gaining that confidence, applying the same techniques/methodologies on OG questions makes more sense and also builds confidence because now your accruacy would have gotten improved. First thing is to have a through understanding of the CR Bible with the help of Gemini, and follow every episode from the GMAT Ninja CR series and solve those questions. Charles explanations are absolute killer and definitely helps building this kind of rigor.
> People generally give recommendations. But, I also wanted to tell you what are *not* recommended and should be absolutely avoided at any cost if you’re aiming for elite scores like 715+. Note that these suggestions are for those people who want to attain elite scores.
> 1. Pre-thinking: As I mentioned earlier, this just doesn’t work on every medium/hard question. Although it works on easy or easy-medium ones, going with that approach as your primary arsenal will not get you anywhere close to reach those elite scores. Most prep companies (e-GMAT especially) notoriously suggest pre-thinking and ask students to make a habit of visualising a mini movie/story in your head and come up with the assumptions or what’s going to happen/predict and look at your options to match with your screenplay. This is detrimental because; 1) you’ll not have enough time to do this entire screenplay. 2) Most of the time, you’d not see your pre-thought assumptions in the options (especially in medium/hard questions). By the time you do this pre-thininking and look at the options, you’d not find them and you’ve nowhere to go. You’ll again follow the same approach and pre-think and yet again fail to see them in the options. You end up getting panicked because you’re running out of time and select something random and move on. e-GMAT notoriously advertises pre-thinking as a game changer, however, it misses out on the basic concept that there are two different types of assumptions questions that are typically asked in the exam. Yes, you read it right. All assumptions questions are not that straightforward. They fall under two categories. One is a supporter type assumption questions and another is defender type assumption questions. Supporter type is an easy one and pre-thinking actually works and quickens the process of solving. Note that most of easy assumption questions are of supporter type and e-gmat banks on this type and advertises. The defender type assumption questions are the notorious ones because there could be a million possible assumptions that you can pre-think and every pre-thought assumption is right, however, you’ll not find them in the options. This is where the difficulty hits and most of the medium/hard assumption questions are of this type. Once you go through the chapter 8 from CR Bible, you’ll understand this on why defender type assumption questions are not easy. E-GMAT methodologies won’t work on these questions. There’s also one post I saw in Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/GMAT/comments/ ... gacy-sct=1)where Martin Murray states the dangers of pre-thinking. He’s more concenrend about the defender type of questions in his argument. I saw several hate comments stating that he is wrong and pre-thinking always works and makes the job easy. But the thing these people miss out is that the pre-thinking is actually determintal on defender type assumption questions. Veterans like Charles/Martin Murray knows this very well and their suggestions are absolute killer. If you go with any test prep company that says pre-thinking is the game changer and shows results as proof, just do not blindly go with them by trying to learn and apply those methodologies. At the end, once you realize that they are not working for you, you must have already spent significant amount of time in learning those faulty concepts and it’ll be much difficult to un-learn and re-learn right methodologies (similar to what happened in my case). Remember that, CR is just a form or math that uses English language instead of numbers. It has to be solved mechanically and logically, not by imagining or visualising and writing screenplays in the head. A test taker under immense time pressure will not have the time to do this entire visualization and take additional cognitive load/spatial memory and flush it out after every question and again play another movie for next question. Utilising spatial memory wisely under immense time pressure is extremely important for solving CR and moving on to next question immediately by flushing the previous questions data for the spatial memory. This point is also mentioned the CR Bible I think somewhere in the first or second chapter. These two were my main mistakes; pre-thinking and visualization. And these were exact techniques that e-GMAT suggests in their course and advertises too but flipping the technique completely opposite. They just go against what CR Bible suggested which was the exact reason why I couldn't solve the CR timely. When I read the CR Bible, it exactly mentioned the issues I was facing and it's just beautiful because it gave solutions and advice for tackling those exact issues.
> 2. If you plan to go for a private tutoring, ensure to do a thorough review of the tutors background and understanding on these concepts at advanced level. *Do not* just go by the results that they portray.
I clearly understand egmat may not be the best for CR, but what about Rc, Quants and DI.
Im actually planning to purchase it, I feel the scholaranium and digital question bank will help me, sectional mocks and all.
Any guidance will be helpful!
Yes, for practise, sectional mocks, scholaranium and neuron is helpful. If your intention is purely practise then yes. Also, they heavily use AI for explanations. If all I see is an AI explanation for the practise questions then there is no point in asking expert’s comments. I can just use Gemini or something which gives me much better explanations because it’s persnolized and knows my weaker areas and pain points much better . After working their entire CR course, although I got striaght As on every module in CR, I couldn’t complete their cementing quizzes and they feel completely different. That’s when I started following GMAT Ninja and Powerscore for anything related to Verbal. I did complete their RC course as well but before doing that I went through all the RC related videos posted in GMAT Ninja channel. I applied those concepts while completing the e-gmat RC course and strictly didn’t bother to listen to their jarring and lengthy explanations. It’s like their only strategy is pre-thinking. Trust me, at the end of the course you’ll be frustured with the word pre-thinking. They say you’ll have to pre-think what the next paragraph is going to be. I mean why should anyone spend their cognitive/spatial energy to pre-think what author is about to speak when the author clearly writes it down in the immediate paragraph. It’s utterly non-sensical. Even for solving any Verbal related DI TPA or MSR, their only strategy is pre-thinking. At this point, you’ll really get pissed off. That’s why I do not bother to even look at their explanations and dare to ask any queries as I do not have confidence in their explanations. I purely use this platform as a battleground for practise questions. I then ask AI if I couldn’t solve them correctly rather than posting them in the comments section. It’s at that point where I stopped anything they say specific to Verbal and used only what GMAT Ninja and Powerscore mentioned. Again, if you face issues or have doubts for the questions where you faltered, better to check with AI for correct explanations or post them in GMAT Club for better explanation, and have a debate on it. The explanations that they provide in the comments are not upto the mark. They feel mostly robotic. For ex: In some questions they say, the correct answer is A because we need to infer that is implied/stated in the passage and in some questions they say we cannot. Like it feels all their explanations are built based on the correct answer. Let’s say they say B is right for a question and they give some explanation for a inference question and you agree with it but for the same question, suppose if GMAC says differently and correct answer is A instead of B, these people change their narrative to suit that. I felt it with most of their explanations. They also say inference in CR is different from inference in RC. You’ll get confused with their verbal explanations. With this understanding, it’ll be really difficult to attain 85+ in Verbal. So, I typically do not go with their explanations. I only use them for practise and strictly not for asking any doubt because I do not have confidence on their explanations.

In short, if you’re weak in anything related to math then yes it’s helpful. I am inherently strong at math so I didn’t bother to listen to any of their explanations and solved them correctly on my own. My opinion on quant and quant related DI might not be helpful for many because I’m already strong at these concepts, so my opinion might not add a weightage. But a big no for anything related to verbal as I am weak at it and couldn’t improve even after getting striaght As and following their course diligently.

Again, this is my view and completely subjective. Please do your own thorough review and analysis.
User avatar
chawlach9
Joined: 28 Jan 2024
Last visit: 09 Jun 2026
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Posts: 39
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's not explicitly given but we could find that out based on what's mentioned in option E.
User avatar
HariharanSekar
Joined: 24 May 2024
Last visit: 20 May 2026
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi
User avatar
hr198
Joined: 20 Jun 2023
Last visit: 09 Jun 2026
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Location: Bangladesh
GRE 1: Q162 V158
GPA: 3.29
WE:Sales (Consumer Packaged Goods)
GRE 1: Q162 V158
Posts: 31
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bubbasch
I absolutely recommend Powerscore CR Bible and GMAT Ninja CR series (especially 2026 series; Episode 2 is my favourite though because Charles clearly explains why negation and pre-thinking/pre-phrasing doesn’t always work especially when solving medium/hard CR questions). CR Bible is absolutely the killer and my understanding completely changed after going through each and every chapter thoroughly in detail. If my understanding of any of the concepts mentioned in the chapters is not exactly how it has to be understood/comprehended, I used Gemini Flash 3.5 (Extended Thinking, this is a free version and has enough token size and wouldn’t get exahusted even if you solve 1000 questions in a day) to make me understand it clearly and generate GMAT Focus style questions something like a 10 question drill for each chapter and solved them. At the end of the each chapter in CR Bible, you’ll see a mini drill with actual GMAT style questions and answers along with the explanations. I asked Gemini to generate something similar and it used to do that and I solve them till I answer every question correctly. There is no limit/fear of exhaustion of questions (although they are not official questions) with this approach because it can generate any number of questions on that particular concept. The main point/objective to do this drill is to ensure that the concept is understood correctly and deeply ingrained. Once that’s done, you can try the hands-on on the OG questions. Again, the reason to do this rigorous exercise is to ensure that concepts are understood correctly and able to apply them perfectly beforehand and not directly applying them on OG questions and exhausting them. Post gaining that confidence, applying the same techniques/methodologies on OG questions makes more sense and also builds confidence because now your accruacy would have gotten improved. First thing is to have a through understanding of the CR Bible with the help of Gemini, and follow every episode from the GMAT Ninja CR series and solve those questions. Charles explanations are absolute killer and definitely helps building this kind of rigor.

People generally give recommendations. But, I also wanted to tell you what are *not* recommended and should be absolutely avoided at any cost if you’re aiming for elite scores like 715+. Note that these suggestions are for those people who want to attain elite scores.

1. Pre-thinking: As I mentioned earlier, this just doesn’t work on every medium/hard question. Although it works on easy or easy-medium ones, going with that approach as your primary arsenal will not get you anywhere close to reach those elite scores. Most prep companies (e-GMAT especially) notoriously suggest pre-thinking and ask students to make a habit of visualising a mini movie/story in your head and come up with the assumptions or what’s going to happen/predict and look at your options to match with your screenplay. This is detrimental because; 1) you’ll not have enough time to do this entire screenplay. 2) Most of the time, you’d not see your pre-thought assumptions in the options (especially in medium/hard questions). By the time you do this pre-thininking and look at the options, you’d not find them and you’ve nowhere to go. You’ll again follow the same approach and pre-think and yet again fail to see them in the options. You end up getting panicked because you’re running out of time and select something random and move on. e-GMAT notoriously advertises pre-thinking as a game changer, however, it misses out on the basic concept that there are two different types of assumptions questions that are typically asked in the exam. Yes, you read it right. All assumptions questions are not that straightforward. They fall under two categories. One is a supporter type assumption questions and another is defender type assumption questions. Supporter type is an easy one and pre-thinking actually works and quickens the process of solving. Note that most of easy assumption questions are of supporter type and e-gmat banks on this type and advertises. The defender type assumption questions are the notorious ones because there could be a million possible assumptions that you can pre-think and every pre-thought assumption is right, however, you’ll not find them in the options. This is where the difficulty hits and most of the medium/hard assumption questions are of this type. Once you go through the chapter 8 from CR Bible, you’ll understand this on why defender type assumption questions are not easy. E-GMAT methodologies won’t work on these questions. There’s also one post I saw in Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/GMAT/comments/ ... gacy-sct=1)where Martin Murray states the dangers of pre-thinking. He’s more concenrend about the defender type of questions in his argument. I saw several hate comments stating that he is wrong and pre-thinking always works and makes the job easy. But the thing these people miss out is that the pre-thinking is actually determintal on defender type assumption questions. Veterans like Charles/Martin Murray knows this very well and their suggestions are absolute killer. If you go with any test prep company that says pre-thinking is the game changer and shows results as proof, just do not blindly go with them by trying to learn and apply those methodologies. At the end, once you realize that they are not working for you, you must have already spent significant amount of time in learning those faulty concepts and it’ll be much difficult to un-learn and re-learn right methodologies (similar to what happened in my case). Remember that, CR is just a form or math that uses English language instead of numbers. It has to be solved mechanically and logically, not by imagining or visualising and writing screenplays in the head. A test taker under immense time pressure will not have the time to do this entire visualization and take additional cognitive load/spatial memory and flush it out after every question and again play another movie for next question. Utilising spatial memory wisely under immense time pressure is extremely important for solving CR and moving on to next question immediately by flushing the previous questions data for the spatial memory. This point is also mentioned the CR Bible I think somewhere in the first or second chapter. These two were my main mistakes; pre-thinking and visualization. And these were exact techniques that e-GMAT suggests in their course and advertises too but flipping the technique completely opposite. They just go against what CR Bible suggested which was the exact reason why I couldn’t solve the CR timely. When I read the CR Bible, it exactly mentioned the issues I was facing and it’s just beautiful because it gave solutions and advice for tackling those exact issues.

2. If you plan to go for a private tutoring, ensure to do a thorough review of the tutors background and understanding on these concepts at advanced level. *Do not* just go by the results that they portray.
I really liked your detail explanation. I don’t know whether it is possible for you to arrange an online meet to show us at first hand, especially how to use Gemini to get us expert on each question types. If possible please do and help us.
   1  ...  25   26   27 
Moderators:
226 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts