How to Interpret Your Week 8 Homework Results
Please read this section each week if you’re serious about optimizing your study time. If you don’t read this, it will be harder to (A) choose your homework wisely, and (B) avoid wasting time reviewing things that don’t really matter.
Some of this advice will be similar from week to week. But plenty of things will change, too. So if you’re panicking about a homework result – or if you’re tempted to spend a half-billion hours reviewing individual questions – please take a deep breath, and read through this post first.
At this stage, it can be particularly hard to make sense of your practice tests. So we strongly recommend reading through at least the first section below.
How to interpret your mba.com test #1: - How far are you from your target score overall? In theory, you’re about 5 weeks from your actual exam, so you shouldn’t be TOO far from your goal. As a very very rough guideline, I’m worried if you still need to gain more than 50 points – but it depends on what, exactly, went wrong.
- Omitted questions can DESTROY your GMAT score. Check to see if you left any questions unanswered. The current version of the GMAT penalizes you severely for omitted questions, so please answer absolutely everything, even if you’re guessing blindly at the end of a section.
- Remember that in the GMAT scoring system, 3 = 20. If you gain 3 “section points” – on any individual section or combination of sections – your total GMAT score will increase by 20 points. More on that in this short video, or here’s a nifty score calculator.
- How far are you from your target score on the quant, verbal, and DI sections? If you’re 5+ points away from your target score on any individual section, you’re at risk of running out of time, and you might want to pause the study plan to work on your underlying skills. Just keep in mind that DI scores are 3-5 points lower than verbal and quant scores, on average – so make sure that you keep that in mind as you set your score targets.
- How many careless errors did you make on quant and DI? If you made more than one silly error on quant or DI, then your main problem might be sloppiness – not necessarily a lack of skill. Even a small handful of silly mistakes can cost you 5+ points on quant or DI. So if this is a problem, fix it NOW.
- Do you notice any patterns in your quant errors? Are you disproportionately missing word translation questions? Annoying algebraic questions with very few words in them? Something else? One or two errors might mean nothing – for example, if you missed two hard, weird rate/work questions (but usually nail the easy ones), that’s cool, and you don’t have anything to worry about. But if you’re missing the same sort of thing repeatedly – especially if the questions seem to be on the easier side – then you’ll want to consider pausing the plan to focus on your weaknesses.
- Count the number of errors you made on each verbal question type. If you see a dramatic imbalance, then you know exactly what to focus on. If your verbal errors are relatively balanced between CR and RC, that might take more time to fix.
- Do you notice any patterns in your DI errors? Are you disproportionately missing verbal-based DI questions? Getting freaked out by the mountain of information on MSR questions? Paralyzing when you see particularly weird graphs? Or do you see some other pattern? To be fair, DI is so multifaceted that it can be hard to spot patterns in your mistakes, but if you’re unhappy with your DI score, try to look beyond the question type, and figure out if anything tends to trigger most of your mistakes.
- Look for signs of stubbornness. If you’re spending more than 3 minutes on individual questions, you’ll need to learn to let go. Time is a scarce resource on the GMAT, and spending 3+ minutes isn’t efficient, other than on the first question of an RC passage or a Multi-Source Reasoning set.
- Is nervousness a factor? Is your mind going blank under the pressure of a practice test? Are you struggling to sleep the night before a practice test? If so, check out this beginner’s guide to test anxiety, this test anxiety quiz, or this YouTube playlist.
- Remember that the experience is totally different if you’re seeing repeated questions. You might not consciously recognize many questions, but I 100% promise that you’ll be faster and more accurate on questions you’ve seen before – and you’re MUCH less likely to struggle with time management as a result. We can’t know whether your score was inflated by 10 points or 50 points or 100 points, but tests with repeated questions are always at least somewhat inflated – and you’ll struggle more with timing on a brand-new test than you did on a familiar one.
What to do about your Week 8 practice test results:
- Feel free to take the mba.com test score (somewhat) seriously. Yes, it might be inflated if you saw familiar questions, so don’t celebrate TOO hard just yet. But if the official test tries to tell you that you need to work on something, you’ll definitely want to listen. Pause the study plan if necessary.
- If you’re making careless errors: As always, job #1 is to stamp them out. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you spent 3+ minutes on too many questions (or maybe 3:30 for non-DS DI questions): This is a question of discipline and mindset. Learn to let go! Remember: the test is designed to make you miss 25-50% of the questions, and most of you will do exactly that – even if you get a great score. So dump the perfectionism, and learn to let questions go.
- Again: don’t spend a ton of time reviewing individual questions. They can drain too much of your precious study time. If a question was hard or weird, then it isn’t the biggest threat to your GMAT goals.
Benchmarks for Your Week 8 Quant Results
The first part is the same as in previous weeks:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY quant set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 8:
- Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- OG & Quant Guide sets (item #2): 80%+ correct is great, 70-80% is good. The questions are getting harder now, so your accuracy might be dropping a bit.
- Number properties questions (items #3-5): 70% or above is probably excellent, but take the results with a grain of salt! These sets are random, and non-official questions on these topics tend to be particularly bizarre. If you happened to see oddball questions, 50-60% correct might be pretty good. The important thing: don’t overreact to your results, as long as you’ve mastered the very basics.
- Speed: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're still in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your skills are shaky, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward.
What Should You Do About Your Quant Weaknesses in Week 8?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re accurate on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
So don’t obsess over the hard questions that you’ve missed. They aren’t worth much of your precious time.
- If your careless error rate is too high: that’s bad. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Better: do it yesterday. Pause the study plan if you need to. Just fix the careless errors.
- If you struggled on the OG or Quant Guide sets (item #2): as usual, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that’s not ideal, but context matters: I really don’t mind if you got beat up by hard or unusual questions. If you missed a cluster of similar questions – especially if they don’t appear to be terribly difficult – then invest time in those topics if necessary. But don’t overreact to individual questions, please.
- If you struggled on the number properties sets (items #3-5): concentrate on putting your errors into context. These questions can be weird – especially non-official questions. If you missed really hard ones or oddball questions, please don’t waste your time reviewing them. If you got CRUSHED on easier questions, you might want to revisit the videos in the study list, but don’t overreact – these topics aren’t worth THAT much time.
- If you struggled on other topic-based sets (item #6): again, concentrate on putting your errors into context, and look for broad patterns. If you made similar errors on several relatively easy questions, then you might want to revisit the quant books or videos. But if you missed hard or strange questions, who cares?
- If you got absolutely DESTROYED by ALL of the quant homework: it’s probably time to pause the study plan, invest some time in rebuilding your basic quant skills, and come back to the plan later.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual quant questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.
Benchmarks for Your Week 8 RC & CR Results
- OG & Verbal Guide RC & CR sets: if your goal is a 90th percentile score on GMAT verbal, 80% correct in under 2 minutes per question is in the right ballpark, and 90% is outstanding. These are getting hard now, so if you’re squirming, that’s cool.
- Accuracy on (optional) LSAT CR & RC sets: 80% accuracy is still the goal if you’re trying to hit the 90th percentile on GMAT verbal; 70% accuracy is fine if you’re happy with an 80V. If you need a check on your progress, it’s a good idea to do an LSAT set occasionally, and compare it to your Week 1 results.
- Efficiency on LSAT CR & RC sets: 60 minutes or less is your long-run goal if you want to have a shot at finishing the GMAT verbal section on time.
- Consistency on LSAT CR & RC sets: your errors and times should fall within a fairly narrow range across ALL of your LSAT sets. LSAT sets (~25 Qs each) do not vary much in difficulty, so if your errors or times fluctuate wildly, that’s a sign that you’re doing very different things at different times, and you might need to work on your approach to questions.
What Should You Do About Your CR & RC Weaknesses in Week 8?
- Look for “careless” errors. As with everything on the GMAT, pay close attention to anything that seems to be an “unforced error.” Did you miss a ton of questions that felt easy to you, especially in the OG and Verbal Guide? If so, you might want to revisit the techniques in the videos and articles in the assignment lists. This is MUCH more important than getting better at harder questions.
- If your results are significantly better on RC than on CR: you might want to invest time in some extra CR sets or videos... and you might want to do so ASAP, because time is becoming scarce. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re better at CR than RC: same as above. If you haven’t already addressed this, it’s probably time to do so. Pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re slow ( > 60 mins per LSAT set, > 2 minutes per OG or Verbal Guide question): by now, you should have standardized your approach to RC and CR questions; if you haven’t, then you probably need to do so ASAP. If your process is spot-on already, maybe you’re slow because of “non-academic” issues: fatigue, distraction, anxiety, the time of day that you’re doing sets, barking dogs outside your window, low blood sugar, a lack of sleep, or a lack of intensity. It’s also possible that you’re a slow reader, and that’s always a hard thing to fix. I wish I could tell you which of these things is happening – but you’ll have to figure that part out for yourself, unfortunately.

- If you’re getting impatient with your results: If you’re hitting our benchmarks, you’re doing GREAT, and you’re ready to get something close to an 84V. If you’re not quite hitting the CR/RC benchmarks yet, are you at least seeing some improvement? If so, you’re on track – keep at it! You can always pause the study plan if you need to.
- If you’re getting CRUSHED on CR & RC: well, I’m very impressed that you’re still reading this in Week 8, but if you’re getting demolished, you’ll want to check out this video about the factors that can lead to GMAT verbal struggles. (It references an older version of the GMAT, but the punchlines are still very, very relevant.) If fundamental reading skills are an issue, this article and this one will give you some ideas for how to improve over time.
Benchmarks for Your Week 8 Data Insights Results
Before you do anything else:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s on DI, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 8:
- Careless error rate: < 2%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- Official DS set (#2 on the list): these are getting harder as you move through the books, so I’d be happy with 80% accuracy here. As always, context matters: if you struggled with a few weird questions – or with any quant topics that you haven’t studied yet – that’s not a big deal.
- Mixed mba.com sets (GI, TA, TPA, MSR – #3-4 on the list): Even if you’re doing just easy and medium questions, the difficulty can vary more than you might think, and sometimes the percentage correct doesn’t tell the full story. So take the results with a small grain of salt, but I’d be happy to see something like 80% correct at this stage; if you’re already approaching 90% correct, you definitely deserve a cookie.
- Randomized batches of forum questions (#5-8 on the list): 85-90% correct is good on the sub-555 questions, but if you did mixed difficulty sets, you’ll have to take the results with a grain of salt – especially since non-official GI, TA, TPA, and number properties questions vary enormously in quality. If you happened to see nasty, strange questions, 50-60% might be pretty good. Don’t overreact if the percentage wasn’t great, though.
- Speed for Data Sufficiency: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If this is still a problem, you might want to consider honing your DS technique, maybe with some help from the videos that appear in the resources lists.
- Speed for Multi-Source Reasoning: On DI, you’ll have an average of 2:15 per question. It’s OK if you’re a bit slower on MSR on test day, but you don’t want to be TOO much slower. So in the long run, you’ll want to average somewhere around 7-9 minutes per set of 3 MSR questions, and ideally on the lower end of that range. Of course, you may or may not see 3 questions per MSR “tab set” on mba.com practice sets, so adjust your expectations accordingly – something like 3-5 minutes on the first question is probably OK, and ideally 2 minutes per less on any subsequent questions. If you’re close to these speeds right now, that’s great.
- Speed for GI, TA, & TPA questions: You're in good shape if you’re close to 2:30 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 3:00 minutes per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward. If that’s still a problem, you might consider spending some extra time with the videos in the resources list to see if those help at all.
What Should You Do About Your Data Insights Weaknesses in Week 8?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be spectacularly accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re taking care of business on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
In other words: don’t obsess over the hard stuff. It isn’t worth much of your precious time.
Here’s what to do once you’ve analyzed your results:
- If your careless error rate is too high: address this problem ASAP. Nothing else matters until you do. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you struggled with Data Sufficiency: hm, that’s not great at this stage, since you’ve had plenty of DS practice. Ask yourself: is quant the underlying problem, or are you still struggling with the DS question format? Either way, the usual video playlists (quant, DI) might help a bit here.
- If you struggled with the Multi-Source Reasoning questions: These might still feel slow and painful, and that’s still OK. The key is learning how to find the right information for each question, without obsessing over every little thing – and that takes time and practice. So please don’t panic if you’re slow or inaccurate. As long as you’re making some progress, that’s OK for now, but feel free to check out the resources list if you’d like some extra help with these.
- If you struggled on specific quant topics, such as statistics: don’t panic, please. It’s far too easy to overreact to a few errors, and study these problems until your eyeballs burst. Instead, try to put your struggles in context: did you miss particularly hard or strange versions of these questions? Were your errors careless? If so, you probably don’t need to do much studying, exactly. But if you missed basic questions because your foundations are shaky, then you might need to do some remedial studying, and it might even make sense to “pause” the study plan to do so – but don’t assume that you need to do this unless the data is very, very clear about your weaknesses.
- If you struggled with official GI, TA, or TPA questions: again, ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re struggling to hit 70% accuracy on these three question types, that’s not ideal at this stage. But context matters: careless errors are the apocalypse, obviously. If you’re struggling with your underlying quant or verbal skills, it might be time to address those head-on. And if you’re doing far worse on these three DI question types than on quant or verbal, it might be a sign that your approach to them is flawed – if that’s the case, extra time with the videos might be a good investment.
- If you got CRUSHED by ALL of the DI homework: if you’re nowhere close to the benchmarks on DI – and if your long-term goal is a score in the 80s – then maybe you need to back away from the study plan, and invest some time in rebuilding your basic skills. If that’s the case for you, tag us in the thread, give us as much detail as you can about your situation, and we’ll try to help.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.