How to Interpret Your Week 4 Homework Results
Please read this section each week if you’re serious about optimizing your study time. We’ll help you understand how good or bad your results are, so that you can (A) choose your homework wisely, and (B) avoid wasting time reviewing questions that don’t really matter.
Obviously, some of this advice will be similar from week to week. But plenty of things will change, too. So if you’re panicking about a homework result – or if you’re tempted to spend a half-billion hours reviewing individual questions – please take a deep breath, and read through this post first.
Also, if you’re worried about something that isn’t addressed here, please post your questions/worries/doubts either here or in the
Week 1 thread. I guarantee that other students are suffering in the same ways as you are.

Benchmarks for the non-official quant test:
- Quant section score: I don’t care, and you shouldn’t either. Non-official tests aren’t necessarily very accurate. Instead, focus on the next two metrics...
- Careless error rate: < 3%. If you made one silly error, that’s OK. More than that? Grrrrrr...
- Questions that took you 3+ minutes: < 3%. Didn’t you hear our guy Mike telling you to “bail when you flail”?
What to do about your Week 4 practice test results:
- Don’t overreact to non-official test scores! It's nearly impossible for practice tests to mimic the actual scoring of the GMAT, so the score itself doesn't matter much.
- If you’re making careless errors: As always, job #1 is to stamp them out. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- If you spent 3+ minutes on too many questions: This is an issue of discipline and mindset. Learn to let go! Remember: the test is designed to make you miss 30-50% of the quant questions, and most of you will do exactly that – even if you get a GREAT score. So dump the perfectionism, and learn to let questions go.
- Again: don’t spend a ton of time reviewing your mistakes. Reviewing individual questions can drain too much of your precious study time. If a question was hard or weird, then it isn’t the biggest threat to your GMAT goals. So please don’t obsess over individual questions – especially non-official ones.
Benchmarks for Your Week 4 Quant Results
The first part is the same as in previous weeks:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY quant set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 4:
- Careless error rate: < 3%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone.
- OG & Quant Guide sets (#2 on the list): 80-90% correct is excellent, 70-80% is probably fine, since these are getting harder. Just remember that WHAT you miss is more important on the GMAT than how many you missed. Careless errors are apocalyptic, but if you missed OG questions on topics that you haven't studied, that's totally cool -- you'll have time to learn those things.
- Ratios and percents questions (#3-4 on the list): 85-90% correct is probably good on the sub-555 questions, but if you did mixed difficulty sets, you’ll have to take the results with a grain of salt. If you happened to see nasty, strange questions, 50-60% might be pretty good.
- Other randomized question sets (#6-7 on the list): again, 85-90% is good on sub-555 questions, but take the results of mixed-difficulty sets with a grain of salt.
- Speed: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward -- and you still have time to improve those things.
What Should You Do About Your Quant Weaknesses in Week 4?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be spectacularly accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re taking care of business on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
In other words: don’t obsess over the hard stuff. It isn’t worth much of your precious time.
Here’s what to do once you’ve analyzed your results:
- If your careless error rate is too high: that’s bad. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Pause the study plan if you need to. Just fix the careless errors.
- If you struggled on the OG or Quant Guide sets (item #2): don’t panic. Again: ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70% accuracy, that’s not ideal, but context matters: if nearly all of those errors are on topics that you’ve never really studied, you’re in great shape, since you have plenty of time to study those over the next couple of months.
- If you struggled on the ratios or percents sets (items #3-4): concentrate on putting your errors into context, and look for broad patterns. If you missed several questions of the same type, then maybe this ratios video, this percents video, or some other resource might help. But if you missed really hard ones or one-off oddball questions, please don’t waste your time on them.
- If you struggled on other topic-based sets (items #6-7): again, concentrate on putting your errors into context, and look for broad patterns. If you make similar errors on several questions, then it’s time to buckle down and figure out what needs to be fixed in your approach. But if you missed hard or strange questions, who cares?
- If you got CRUSHED by ALL of the quant homework: if you’re nowhere close to the benchmarks on quant – and if your long-term goal is a score in the 80s – then maybe you need to back away from the study plan, and invest some time in rebuilding your basic quant skills. If that’s the case for you, tag us in the thread, give us as much detail as you can about your situation, and we’ll try to help.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual quant questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.
Our usual disclaimer: LSAT sets are HARD. If you’re not in pain, you’re probably not doing it right.

Improving on RC and CR is usually a slow, agonizing process. Don’t get discouraged – be proud when your results tick upwards a little bit.
Slow, steady progress is still gorgeous, even when it hurts.
Benchmarks for Your Week 4 RC & CR Results
- Accuracy on LSAT CR & RC sets: 80% is the long-run goal if you’re shooting for a 90th percentile score or above on verbal. It’s still OK if you’re not quite there in Week 4, as long as you’re getting close. Please adjust accordingly if you’re happy with a lower verbal score – for example, 70% on the LSAT is probably fine if you’re shooting for an 80V on the GMAT.
- Efficiency on LSAT CR & RC sets: 60 minutes or less is your long-run goal. Again, it’s OK if you’re not quite there in Week 4, but you should be close by now.
- Consistency on LSAT CR & RC sets: your errors and times should fall within a fairly narrow range across ALL of your LSAT sets. LSAT sets (~25 Qs each) do not vary much in difficulty, so if your errors or times fluctuate wildly, that’s a sign that you’re doing very different things at different times, and you might need to work on your approach to questions.
- GMAT OG RC + Verbal Guide CR sets: if you’re shooting for a 90th percentile score on the GMAT, we’d like to see 85-90% accuracy here, in no more than 2 minutes per question. (Adjust accordingly if your GMAT score goal is more modest.) These aren’t too hard yet, but they’ll get tougher in the coming weeks, so don’t be alarmed if your results look somewhat flat over time.
What Should You Do About Your CR & RC Weaknesses in Week 4?
- Look at Week 1 for signs of progress. Are you seeing ANY improvement in your average accuracy and times from Week 1 until now? If you’ve reduced your LSAT CR and RC errors by 5-10%, that’s legitimately a great achievement, and you’re very much on track.
- Look for “careless” errors. As with everything on the GMAT, pay close attention to anything that seems to be an “unforced error.” Did you miss a ton of questions that felt easy to you, especially in the OG and Verbal Guide? If so, you might want to revisit the techniques in the videos and articles in the assignment lists. This is MUCH more important on an adaptive exam than getting better at harder questions.
- If your results are significantly better on RC than on CR: you might want to invest time in some extra CR sets or videos – we’ll provide recommendations each week.
- If you’re better at CR than RC: When this happens, the most common reasons are that you’re obsessing over details when you read RC (and missing the “big picture” by doing so), or you’re struggling to stay focused through a long passage. Maybe you’ll want to err on the side of getting a bit of extra practice on RC in the coming weeks, and we’ll keep feeding you videos that might help, too.
- If you’re slow ( > 60 mins per LSAT set, > 2 minutes per OG or Verbal Guide question): sadly, there are a ton of different reasons why your times might be high. At this stage, maybe you’re still learning new approaches, so you’re still figuring out how to integrate them into your process – if that’s the case, your times will come down. Maybe you’re not doing each set with test-like intensity. Maybe you need more coffee or more sleep. Maybe you’d be sharper at a different time of day. Maybe there’s inefficiency in your process – and if that’s the case, it’s likely that you’re still struggling to fully incorporate the techniques that you’ll see in the videos. It’s also possible that you’re a slow reader, and that’s a hard thing to fix. I wish I could tell you which of these things is happening – but you’ll have to figure that part out for yourself, unfortunately.

- If you’re getting impatient with your results: hey, it’s still only Week 4. If you’re hitting our benchmarks, you’re doing GREAT. If you’re not quite hitting the marks yet, are you at least seeing some improvement? If so, you’re on track – keep at it!
- If you’re getting CRUSHED on CR & RC: my heart hurts for you, because that’s a terrible feeling. If your goal is something like a 80V, 60-70% on your LSAT sets might be OK at this stage – even if you feel terrible as you suffer through those sets. But if you have ambitious goals (84V+) and you’re truly struggling to understand the passages, it’s possible that you need to spend some time working on your fundamental reading skills before returning to GMAT-specific verbal prep. This article and this one will give you some ideas for how to improve your reading precision over time.
We’re still warming up on Data Insights, and this week’s homework featured Data Sufficiency and just a wee bit of GI – we have a long way to go, so the most important thing is not to overreact.
You’ll spend TONS of time building your fundamental DI skills in the next month or two – so don’t obsess over individual questions yet. It’s a waste of your time.
That said, if you struggled badly on the Graphical Interpretation set, that’s a sign that you’ll want to invest more time in DI – perhaps by spending extra time with the videos, since there’s a limited supply of high-quality DI practice questions – in the next month or two. If you can afford to cut back on other topics to make room for extra DI work, great. If not, you can always pause the study plan, and spend extra time with DI content in the next month or so.
Benchmarks for Your Week 2 Data Insights Results
Before you do anything else:
- Count the errors that make you go "whoa, how the 🤬 did I miss THAT one?!?" No really: count them, for EVERY set you completed. Then divide that by the total number of questions to get your careless error rate.
If your long-term goal is to score in the 80s on DI, here are the metrics I’d like you to hit in Week 4:
- Careless error rate: < 3%. You’ve heard this before: the careless errors need to be gone, or almost gone. This is the first week you’ve done any Graphical Interpretation questions, so you might see one or two careless errors slip through, but please do everything you can to get rid of them as soon as possible.
- OG & Data Insights Guide sets (#2-3 on the list): if your long-term goal is an 80+ on DI, I’d like to see you get at least 80% correct at this stage on GI questions, and ideally closer to 90% on DS, since those questions are still relatively easy. Just remember that WHAT you miss is more important on the GMAT than how many you missed: careless errors are apocalyptic. If you missed DS questions on quant topics that you haven't studied, that's totally cool -- you'll have time to learn those things.
- Randomized batches of forum questions (#4-6 on the list): 85-90% correct is good on the sub-555 questions, but if you did mixed difficulty sets, you’ll have to take the results with a grain of salt. If you happened to see nasty, strange questions, 50-60% might be pretty good. Don’t overreact if the percentage wasn’t great, though.
- Speed for Data Sufficiency: On the OG and topic-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 2:30 per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you're not choosing efficient paths forward -- and you'll be able to improve those things over time.
- Speed for Graphical Interpretation: On the OG-based sets, you're in good shape if you’re reasonably close to 2:30 minutes per question. If you're slower than, say, 3:00 minutes per question on average, it might be a sign that your basic skills are rusty, or that you’re misreading a bit, or failing to choose efficient paths forward -- and you'll be able to improve those things over time, too.
What Should You Do About Your Data Insights Weaknesses in Week 4?
Our usual reminder: on an adaptive test, job #1 is to be spectacularly accurate on the questions that you’re capable of getting right. If you’re taking care of business on the easier ones, you’ll get pounded by harder questions – and you’ll miss plenty of them. Embrace the pain.
In other words: don’t obsess over the hard stuff. It isn’t worth much of your precious time.
Here’s what to do once you’ve analyzed your results:
- If your careless error rate is too high: address this problem ASAP. Nothing else matters until you do. Do whatever you need to do to fix this. Do it now. Check out the resource list in the study plan for help.
- This might look familiar by now: if you struggled with the overall process for answering a Data Sufficiency question: check out this LIVE video on the DS process or this (not-so-live) DS video.
- If you struggled with the graphical interpretation questions: check out this live video on how to approach Graphical Interpretation questions or this one that tells you to just read the bleeping graph
- If you struggled with specific quant topics: (ratios, percents, etc.), don’t panic. It’s far too easy to overreact to a few errors, and study these topics until you faceplant into your desk. Instead, try to put your struggles in context: did you miss particularly hard or strange versions of these questions? Were your errors careless? If so, you probably don’t need to do much studying, exactly. But if you missed basic questions because your foundations are shaky, then you might need to do some remedial studying, and it might even make sense to “pause” the study plan to do so – but don’t assume that you need to do this unless the data is very, very clear about your weaknesses.
- If you struggled on the OG or Data Insights Guide sets: don’t panic. Again: ask yourself WHY you struggled. If you’re at, say, 70-80% accuracy, that’s not ideal right now. But context matters: if most of those errors are on topics you’ve never really studied, you’re in great shape, since you have plenty of time to learn those in the next 9 weeks.
- If you got CRUSHED by ALL of the homework: if you’re nowhere close to the benchmarks on Data Sufficiency – and if your long-term goal is a score in the 80s – then maybe you need to back away from the study plan, and invest some time in rebuilding your basic skills. If that’s the case for you, tag us in the thread, give us as much detail as you can about your situation, and we’ll try to help.
- How much time should you spend reviewing individual questions? Not much, please! Because it can take SOOOOOOO much time to review a question, it should be your absolute last resort. That’s why we want you to redo questions first – sometimes, you’ll see your mistake right away, and that’s the best way to learn. If you miss a question a second time, then maybe it’s a sign of an underlying issue.
- No, really: resist the temptation to obsess over individual questions. Instead, look for patterns in your errors – an error on one question might be a fluke (or a weird, hard, or badly written question), but if you miss several related questions, you have an opportunity to get a good ROI on your study time by addressing a general weakness via a video or articles or books.