Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 22:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# GMAT Set 30 - 26

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 864
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 7

GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2008, 13:58
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash
injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries
are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.
Some
commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for
whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These
commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries
with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:
clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for
whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually
have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the
argument on the accuracy of that finding.
B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
C. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second
is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the
argument criticizes.
D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that
the argument accepts.
E. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument
accepts; the second is that conclusion.
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2476
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 774 [0], given: 19

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2008, 23:19
botirvoy wrote:
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.
B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
C. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.
D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.
E. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

I am going for A.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1553
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2008, 23:59
D by POE.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 489
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 13

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 07:52
C for me...

OA?

Cheers
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 195
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 12:27
IMO C
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 296
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 16:36
C for me too ...
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 462
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 4

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 18:51
stallone wrote:
C for me too ...

ditto. OA?
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 112
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 3

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 19:46
C for me too. What is OA?
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2008, 22:35
(C)
_________________

Kick GMAT ass

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2476
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 774 [0], given: 19

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2008, 22:31
Hi botirvoy,

This is OA/OE time. Can you come up with OA/OE?
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 864
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 7

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2008, 04:58
OA C. Thanks guys!
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2008, 17:53
Shytt! I picked C but this was tough!!!
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 790
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2008, 18:09
Some how it was B for me!

Situation: A higher report of the incidences is not due inaccuracies but due to incentive to report the incidence.

Bold face1: Evaluates the argument
Boldface2: not supported or rejected by the argument

A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the
argument on the accuracy of that finding. [Second is not intermediate conclusion]

B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding. [ Hold]

C. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second
is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the
argument criticizes.[ Not the implications]

D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that
the argument accepts. [Nop]

E. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument
accepts; the second is that conclusion. [Second is not the conclusion]

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2008, 18:20
hanumayamma wrote:
Some how it was B for me!

Situation: A higher report of the incidences is not due inaccuracies but due to incentive to report the incidence.

Bold face1: Evaluates the argument
Boldface2: not supported or rejected by the argument

A. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the
argument on the accuracy of that finding. [Second is not intermediate conclusion]

B. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is
evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding. [ Hold]

C. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second
is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the
argument criticizes.[ Not the implications]

D. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that
the argument accepts. [Nop]

E. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument
accepts; the second is that conclusion. [Second is not the conclusion]

It has to be the implications and here is why. The argument starts off to say that the frequency of such WL claims is twice compared to other countries which do not support the WL claims. Author agrees that there might be spurious claims but disagree with the bigger claim that half of all the claims are spurious and also draws another conclusion that one cannot compare it with the countries which do not support WLC as there is no incentive to claim there.

Any way, the ice breaker was the evidence vs IC. I feel that it is IC and not evidence because

(a) Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Reason in red conclusion in green

(b) commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries
with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 105
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 6

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2008, 04:20
C for me
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 943
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 77

Kudos [?]: 1329 [0], given: 40

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2010, 05:07
This is one of those arguments on which there are multi types of BF questions has been created

I marked C in 3+ min
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Re: GMAT Set 30 - 26   [#permalink] 21 Jun 2010, 05:07
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
GMAT Club Grammar Book Exercise 26 1 11 Sep 2015, 03:48
Questions on Relative clauses from GMAT club Grammar book -Exercise 26 4 23 Jan 2016, 23:28
Verbal SETS: something like GmatClubtests 1 22 Jan 2012, 01:07
64 The three women, liberal activists who strongly support 24 09 Apr 2017, 07:48
GMAT Set 30 - 5 8 10 Nov 2008, 10:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by