Last visit was: 17 Jul 2025, 14:04 It is currently 17 Jul 2025, 14:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Resolve Paradox|               
User avatar
ezinis
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Last visit: 04 Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
436
 [39]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Montreal
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Yale, HEC
Posts: 87
Kudos: 436
 [39]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mackieman
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 26 Jul 2013
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
196
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Concentration: Finance
 Q44  V35
Posts: 127
Kudos: 196
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 4,726
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,813
Posts: 4,726
Kudos: 36,189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pike
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Last visit: 27 Dec 2020
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
478
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Posts: 245
Kudos: 478
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B.

I don't see a rationale for E. The question asks, how does the sweetner CAUSE the effect.

E has no cause, it merely explains the experiment procedure. As it has overtones of avoiding the placebo affect, it is a natural draw, but the question very clearly asks for a cause.

E is almost like choosing an option that says "both groups were given different drugs", ok, but so what? There is no causal link there that the question asks for.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
newHorizons
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Last visit: 19 Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B is correct.
The question asks a reason to explain why the sweetner caused lower cognitive ability?
Premise given is that an amino acid contained in the sweetner caused the detrimental effect.
High consumption of sweetner = high levels of amino acid because it's the principal constituent.
and B says that high levels of amino in blood causes brain malfunction. and Hence B is the answer.
User avatar
windofchange
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Status:One last try =,=
Posts: 119
Kudos: 448
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The conclusion: The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents. shows the cause-effect relationship: An amino acid in the sweetener ---> detrimental effects (lower cognitive ability)

I think it is a Strengthen, not an Assumption question.

Choice E does not strengthen the conclusion. The fact that subjects know what they are consuming or not does not shed any light about the cause-effect relationship above.
User avatar
SOURH7WK
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Concentration: Marketing
 Q47  V26 GMAT 2: 540  Q45  V19 GMAT 3: 580  Q48  V23
GPA: 3.2
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer B.
It provides the missing link and makes the conclusion more believable.
User avatar
vivekdixit07
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Last visit: 30 Jan 2021
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
GMAT Date: 11-02-2012
Posts: 38
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PUNEETSCHDV
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.Which of the following, if true, would best help explain how the sweetener might produce the observed effect?
(A) The government’s analysis of the artificial sweetener determined that it was sold in relatively pure form.
(B) A high level of the amino acid in the blood inhibits the synthesis of a substance required for normal brain functioning.
(C) Because the sweetener is used primarily as a food additive, adverse reactions to it are rarely noticed by consumers.
(D) The amino acid that is a constituent of the sweetener is also sold separately as a dietary supplement.
(E) Subjects in the experiment did not know whether they were consuming the sweetener or a second, harmless substance.

I chose B, as it gives the reason.

Although I have doubt- is option E an assumption?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,128
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,128
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
moulayabdesslam
Half of the subjects in an experiment--the experimental group--consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects--the control group--who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the conclusion that some ingredient of the sweetener was responsible for the experimental results?

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.

This is a good CR question from GMATPrep.

--
Need Kudos
Dear moulayabdesslam,
This is a great question! I'm happy to help. :-)

For this and related question, it's good to have the general ideas of experimental design. See:
Medical Trials and the Placebo Effect on the GMAT Critical Reasoning

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.

B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct

C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct

D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!

E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (D).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,128
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
moulayabdesslam
Need Kudos
Dear moulayabdesslam,

My friend, I should have noticed this before my previous response, but you committed a breach of protocol on GMAT Club. Never never never post in a new thread a question that has already been posted. Many GMAT Prep questions are already here. Always always always search extensively for a question before posting it in a new thread. If a question has already been posted, ask your questions there (you may find your question has already been answered by the experts' responses in that pre-existing thread). This particularly question has already been posted, so I merged your topic into this one. If you wish for more kudos, the first step would be to learn all the protocols of GMAT Club and not to violate them.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
moulayabdesslam
Joined: 10 Sep 2016
Last visit: 26 Jul 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Status:Pursuit of Happiness
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: HBS '19 CBS '19
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 590 Q44 V27
GPA: 3.94
Schools: HBS '19 CBS '19
GMAT 2: 590 Q44 V27
Posts: 23
Kudos: 297
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Dear moulayabdesslam,
This is a great question! I'm happy to help. :-)

For this and related question, it's good to have the general ideas of experimental design. See:
Medical Trials and the Placebo Effect on the GMAT Critical Reasoning

A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did.
The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.

B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct

C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct

D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!

E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (D).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)

Thank you, Mike, for a wonderful explanation! The Ph. D/Algebra One Class analogy made me laugh. As a friend says, rien de mieux que de joindre l'utilie à l'agréable! (Tr: Nothing is better than to join the useful to the pleasant).

Have a great evening!
Moulay

--
Need Kudos
User avatar
StoicBread
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Last visit: 16 Apr 2017
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
GPA: 3.92
Posts: 60
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experiment group members did.
Irrelevant. We are only concerned with members of test groups.

B) The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition.
This would weaken the researchers' conclusions.

C) The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators.
Also would weaken the researchers' conclusion. If a third-party has already done research, there would likely be another cause. Obviously not impossible that the researchers come to a different conclusion, but this answer requires too many assumptions for the GMAT.

D) The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment.
Strengthens. Minimizes the chance of a third cause. In research experiments, the more similar the test group and the control group are the stronger the conclusion(s) of the study.

E) A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
Irrelevant. We're only concerned about the first experiment.

+1 KUDOS IF EXPLANATION WAS HELPFUL
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,982
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,982
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did. - Incorrect. Out of scope.

(B) The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. - Incorrect. Out of scope.

(C) The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

(D) The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. - Correct. Supports the claim mentioned in the argument by stating that there was no disparity between the subjects chosen.

(E) A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener. - Incorrect. Out of context.

Answer: D
User avatar
laddaboy
Joined: 22 May 2015
Last visit: 20 Oct 2024
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
108
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 108
Kudos: 108
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Para says There are 2 groups One group had loads of a sweetener and the other didn't. And the abilities of the group which had the sweetener decreased after the intake.

Ques : Pick an answer that proves sweetener is at fault.

Hence D. Earlier there were on same level, then some had sweetener and lost there abilities
avatar
Aussy2000
Joined: 22 Apr 2017
Last visit: 27 Mar 2018
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Posts: 24
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
niraj92
Why B is correct?
The question is a strengthen question in earnest.

There is a logical correlation and causation gap that exist when you try to link the premise and the conclusion.

Anything that explains why amino acid in the conclusion inhibits cognitive function would add more credibility to the conclusion and hence strengthen it.

B does exactly that.

Hope this helps.

A Kudos for my worries would be appreciated :D
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,457
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,457
Kudos: 954
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts