Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 10 Oct 2018, 03:31
8
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
5% (low)
Question Stats:
83% (01:05) correct 17% (01:05) wrong based on 1017 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.
Which of the following, if true, would best help explain how the sweetener might produce the observed effect?
(A) The government’s analysis of the artificial sweetener determined that it was sold in relatively pure form.
(B) A high level of the amino acid in the blood inhibits the synthesis of a substance required for normal brain functioning.
(C) Because the sweetener is used primarily as a food additive, adverse reactions to it are rarely noticed by consumers.
(D) The amino acid that is a constituent of the sweetener is also sold separately as a dietary supplement.
(E) Subjects in the experiment did not know whether they were consuming the sweetener or a second, harmless substance.
Should E be an assumption the conclusion need ? I wonder why E is wrong. I eliminated B because we do not know if the experimental group consumes a significant amount of sweetener to add to the "high level of amino acid"
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2011, 13:09
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.
Large quantites of the sweetener corresponds to the high level of amino acid in the blood (if true).
My comment on E): It's kind of standard to conduct experiments with one controll group whom receives placebo-pills/"sugar pills".
_________________
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jan 2011, 02:28
B.
I don't see a rationale for E. The question asks, how does the sweetner CAUSE the effect.
E has no cause, it merely explains the experiment procedure. As it has overtones of avoiding the placebo affect, it is a natural draw, but the question very clearly asks for a cause.
E is almost like choosing an option that says "both groups were given different drugs", ok, but so what? There is no causal link there that the question asks for.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Apr 2011, 09:56
B is correct. The question asks a reason to explain why the sweetner caused lower cognitive ability? Premise given is that an amino acid contained in the sweetner caused the detrimental effect. High consumption of sweetner = high levels of amino acid because it's the principal constituent. and B says that high levels of amino in blood causes brain malfunction. and Hence B is the answer.
_________________
"Eat, Drink, and be Merry. For tomorrow we die." - Dave Matthews.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Apr 2011, 20:06
The conclusion: The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents. shows the cause-effect relationship: An amino acid in the sweetener ---> detrimental effects (lower cognitive ability)
I think it is a Strengthen, not an Assumption question.
Choice E does not strengthen the conclusion. The fact that subjects know what they are consuming or not does not shed any light about the cause-effect relationship above.
_________________
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2012, 16:03
Answer B. It provides the missing link and makes the conclusion more believable.
_________________
Regards SD ----------------------------- Press Kudos if you like my post. Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2012, 09:02
PUNEETSCHDV wrote:
Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects—the control group—who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.Which of the following, if true, would best help explain how the sweetener might produce the observed effect? (A) The government’s analysis of the artificial sweetener determined that it was sold in relatively pure form. (B) A high level of the amino acid in the blood inhibits the synthesis of a substance required for normal brain functioning. (C) Because the sweetener is used primarily as a food additive, adverse reactions to it are rarely noticed by consumers. (D) The amino acid that is a constituent of the sweetener is also sold separately as a dietary supplement. (E) Subjects in the experiment did not know whether they were consuming the sweetener or a second, harmless substance.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2016, 15:48
moulayabdesslam wrote:
Half of the subjects in an experiment--the experimental group--consumed large quantities of a popular artificial sweetener. Afterward, this group showed lower cognitive abilities than did the other half of the subjects--the control group--who did not consume the sweetener. The detrimental effects were attributed to an amino acid that is one of the sweetener’s principal constituents.
Which of the following, if true, would best support the conclusion that some ingredient of the sweetener was responsible for the experimental results?
A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did. B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener.
This is a good CR question from GMATPrep.
-- Need Kudos
Dear moulayabdesslam, This is a great question! I'm happy to help.
A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did. The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.
B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct
C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct
D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!
E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener. The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2016, 15:53
moulayabdesslam wrote:
Need Kudos
Dear moulayabdesslam,
My friend, I should have noticed this before my previous response, but you committed a breach of protocol on GMAT Club. Never never never post in a new thread a question that has already been posted. Many GMAT Prep questions are already here. Always always always search extensively for a question before posting it in a new thread. If a question has already been posted, ask your questions there (you may find your question has already been answered by the experts' responses in that pre-existing thread). This particularly question has already been posted, so I merged your topic into this one. If you wish for more kudos, the first step would be to learn all the protocols of GMAT Club and not to violate them.
A. Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did. The conclusion concerned the comparison of control group to experimental group. What people do in the outside world is not directly relevant to the conclusions based on this within-experiment comparison. This is not correct.
B. The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. That's fascinating but it doesn't help us at all in deciding whether this amino acid or anything else in the sweetener played a role in making the experimental group show lower cognitive abilities. This is not correct
C. The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. Well, that's certainly good: for legal and ethical reasons, we would hope that this is true, but other than keeping people alive, this plays no role in determining what caused the difference in abilities. This is not correct
D. The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. Aha! This is interesting! Suppose this weren't true! For the sake of argument, suppose the challenge were mathematical in nature. Suppose the control group were a bunch of people with Ph.D.s in mathematics and experimental group were folks who could not get past Algebra One in school. Clearly, these two groups have differing mathematical abilities! If they perform differently on a math task, that's hardly a surprise, and probably not due to the sweetener or whatever is in it! If the two groups have different abilities, then that introduces a plausible alternative explanation for the differing performances in cognitive abilities. A good experimental design would guarantee that the folks in the two groups were evenly matched in cognitive skills, so that there was no pronounced difference in either direction, so that the result can only be attributable to the sweetener and nothing but the sweetener. This extraordinarily strengthens the conclusion!
E. A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener. The second experiment sounds poorly designed, and tells us nothing about the conclusion in the first experiment. This is incorrect.
The only possible answer is (D).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Mike
Thank you, Mike, for a wonderful explanation! The Ph. D/Algebra One Class analogy made me laugh. As a friend says, rien de mieux que de joindre l'utilie à l'agréable! (Tr: Nothing is better than to join the useful to the pleasant).
Have a great evening! Moulay
-- Need Kudos
_________________
If you find this post hepful, please press +1 Kudos
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Dec 2016, 22:23
A) Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experiment group members did. Irrelevant. We are only concerned with members of test groups.
B) The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. This would weaken the researchers' conclusions.
C) The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. Also would weaken the researchers' conclusion. If a third-party has already done research, there would likely be another cause. Obviously not impossible that the researchers come to a different conclusion, but this answer requires too many assumptions for the GMAT.
D) The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. Strengthens. Minimizes the chance of a third cause. In research experiments, the more similar the test group and the control group are the stronger the conclusion(s) of the study.
E) A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener. Irrelevant. We're only concerned about the first experiment.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jan 2017, 00:01
1
(A) Most consumers of the sweetener do not consume as much of it as the experimental group members did. - Incorrect. Out of scope.
(B) The amino acid referred to in the conclusion is a component of all proteins, some of which must be consumed for adequate nutrition. - Incorrect. Out of scope.
(C) The quantity of the sweetener consumed by individuals in the experimental group is considered safe by federal food regulators. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.
(D) The two groups of subjects were evenly matched with regard to cognitive abilities prior to the experiment. - Correct. Supports the claim mentioned in the argument by stating that there was no disparity between the subjects chosen.
(E) A second experiment in which subjects consumed large quantities of the sweetener lacked a control group of subjects who were not given the sweetener. - Incorrect. Out of context.
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jan 2017, 00:14
2
Para says There are 2 groups One group had loads of a sweetener and the other didn't. And the abilities of the group which had the sweetener decreased after the intake.
Ques : Pick an answer that proves sweetener is at fault.
Hence D. Earlier there were on same level, then some had sweetener and lost there abilities
_________________
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jan 2018, 18:01
niraj92 wrote:
Why B is correct?
The question is a strengthen question in earnest.
There is a logical correlation and causation gap that exist when you try to link the premise and the conclusion.
Anything that explains why amino acid in the conclusion inhibits cognitive function would add more credibility to the conclusion and hence strengthen it.
B does exactly that.
Hope this helps.
A Kudos for my worries would be appreciated :D
gmatclubot
Re: Half of the subjects in an experiment—the experimental group—consumed &nbs
[#permalink]
12 Jan 2018, 18:01
close
83% (01:05) correct 
