It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 12:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages verwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.

In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the historian’s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.

Seems easy to me...............picked A, views please????

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1144

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 12:21

Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out ---> context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish.

The reported declines did not happen --> the is that position.

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3349

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 12:34
agree with C..

the second bold sentence is clearly a conclusion or position..the first is supporting the conclusion

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - SET 23 Q19 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 12:39
singh_amit19 wrote:
Historian: In the Drindian Empire, censuses were conducted annually to determine the population of each village. Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete. This very completeness makes one point stand out; in five different years, villages verwhelmingly reported significant population declines. Tellingly, each of those five years immediately followed an increase in a certain Drindian tax. This tax, which was assessed on villages, was computed by the central government using the annual census figures. Obviously, whenever the tax went up, villages had an especially powerful economic incentive to minimize the number of people they recorded; and concealing the size of a village’s population from government census takers would have been easy. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the reported declines did not happen.

In the historian’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first supplies a context for the historian’s argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish.
B. The first presents evidence to support the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second acknowledges a consideration that has been used to argue against that position.
C. The first provides a context for certain evidence that supports the position that the historian seeks to establish; the second is that position.
D. The first is a position for which the historian argues; the second is an assumption that serves as the basis of that argument.
E. The first is an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; the second acknowledges a consideration that calls that assumption into question.

Seems easy to me...............picked A, views please????

Fine OA is C

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - SET 23 Q19   [#permalink] 29 Sep 2007, 12:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by