Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:29 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
pelihu
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Last visit: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 2,208
Own Kudos:
Schools:Darden
Posts: 2,208
Kudos: 526
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
59
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pelihu
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Last visit: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 2,208
Own Kudos:
Schools:Darden
Posts: 2,208
Kudos: 526
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
thehizzle
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Last visit: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pelihu, quick question:

What is the difference between low-, mid- and top- performers? How can a bank distinguish between the good and the bad? Is it just a matter of face time (staying in late, showing that you're a trooper) and ensuring that your analysts don't screw up? Could you provide some more examples on what Summer/ 1st year associates do?

I ask this because I've heard that summer and first/second year associates spend most of the time along side analysts, some time liaising with VP and MDs, and very little time in front of clients. ... I'm wondering if your performance is more a function of how well your analysts do and how you're perceived than competency...

Thanks for your insights. They're freaken awesome!!

The hizzle
User avatar
pelihu
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Last visit: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 2,208
Own Kudos:
Schools:Darden
Posts: 2,208
Kudos: 526
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well, most firms take it right down to the bottom line. People are credited with the deals that they worked on during the year (completed deals matter about 10000% more than pitches that died on the vine), and the ones who worked on the most deals will be in the top bucket. Face time doesn't have much to do with it. In fact, as I've mentioned before, my experience is that things are so busy that people are generally happy for you when you don't have to stay late. This is all relative of course, because everyone works late almost all the time. If someone were to leave at 8PM every day, they would surely stand out and get a stern talking to.

There is some quality component to the ranking system as well, as you will be reviewed by those you work for as well as those who work for you (I think most firms now use a 360-degree rating system). This helps to limit the a-hole factor to an extent, but let's face it, banks are more than happy to accept personality quirks from people who bring home the bacon. I'm not saying that high performers necessarily need to be a-holes, a lot of great bankers I knew were really nice people, but being nice is not a big factor in how you are rated.

Client contact in the early years will depend a lot on the size and types of deals you are working on. Do you really think the CEO of a multi-billion dollar company wants to spend quality time working with a first-year associate when he's doing a once-in-a-lifetime deal to sell his company? It's not like your going to be advising on changes to a product line or something like that. If you're working on smaller deals, then client contact could come right away (there are lots of banks focusing on $100mm or $500mm deals that the big guys won't touch); but you'll need to spend some time learning your craft before you can show your face on the big deals.

Associates have different responsibilities than analysts. Analysts need to be able to crunch numbers and put together stuff accurately and quickly. Associates need to be able to understand and think about deals. For example, an analyst can build the model to figure out whether LBO debt can be paid down during a given period. An associate needs to be able to figure out whether the company has a realistic shot at generating projected cash flows. The analyst just needs to crunch the numbers, the associate needs to understand whether the numbers make sense, have some ideas about how far to push the numbers and perhaps have some advice on how the company can improve the numbers. That said, I have heard horror stories of MDs who treat analysts and associates as interchangeable disposable resources. Firm culture can make a huge difference.

Which brings me to my disclaimer. Most of what I say about banking pertains to the now defunct independent broker model. Bear is gone, Lehman is gone, Merrill is now under a CEO who last year wanted to kill investment banking within his own firm and last week said he wouldn't pay Wall Street salaries to bankers (great retention plan sir), Morgan may well be a dead-man-walking and Goldman is now taking deposits!?!? Hard to say exactly what the life of an associate will be like going forward. Do you guys think orientation for new associates will now include bank teller training?
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pelihu

Which brings me to my disclaimer. Most of what I say about banking pertains to the now defunct independent broker model. Bear is gone, Lehman is gone, Merrill is now under a CEO who last year wanted to kill investment banking within his own firm and last week said he wouldn't pay Wall Street salaries to bankers (great retention plan sir), Morgan may well be a dead-man-walking and Goldman is now taking deposits!?!? Hard to say exactly what the life of an associate will be like going forward. Do you guys think orientation for new associates will now include bank teller training?

I noticed this. It's somewhat sickening. What exactly does he plan to do to retain top talent? Sure, in this market, just having a job is good enough, but once the market heats back up I would assume that all of the senior bankers from Merrill will just go out and start their own advisory boutiques.

There's certainly a culture clash, which is to be expected, but unless there's federal regulation limiting banking/advisory compensation, he's likely not going to get away with this.
User avatar
dominion
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Last visit: 16 Apr 2011
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 108
Kudos: 350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pelihu, can you give us a commentary on the i-banking career path as a top MBA graduating in this tumult?
avatar
thehizzle
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Last visit: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Simply awesome. Thanks, pelihu.

Considering that many associates don't have banking experience pre-mba, it's surprising that they're expected to rationalize the numbers that their analysts punch-out. Any thoughts on what first-year students can do to improve this aspect of their game (that is, understanding models and doing things to help them become a solid associate)? I plan to matriculate into an MBA program next year, and career-switch into banking. Any thoughts on what prospectives could do would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again - I love reading your work!

pelihu
Well, most firms take it right down to the bottom line. People are credited with the deals that they worked on during the year (completed deals matter about 10000% more than pitches that died on the vine), and the ones who worked on the most deals will be in the top bucket. Face time doesn't have much to do with it. In fact, as I've mentioned before, my experience is that things are so busy that people are generally happy for you when you don't have to stay late. This is all relative of course, because everyone works late almost all the time. If someone were to leave at 8PM every day, they would surely stand out and get a stern talking to.

There is some quality component to the ranking system as well, as you will be reviewed by those you work for as well as those who work for you (I think most firms now use a 360-degree rating system). This helps to limit the a-hole factor to an extent, but let's face it, banks are more than happy to accept personality quirks from people who bring home the bacon. I'm not saying that high performers necessarily need to be a-holes, a lot of great bankers I knew were really nice people, but being nice is not a big factor in how you are rated.

Client contact in the early years will depend a lot on the size and types of deals you are working on. Do you really think the CEO of a multi-billion dollar company wants to spend quality time working with a first-year associate when he's doing a once-in-a-lifetime deal to sell his company? It's not like your going to be advising on changes to a product line or something like that. If you're working on smaller deals, then client contact could come right away (there are lots of banks focusing on $100mm or $500mm deals that the big guys won't touch); but you'll need to spend some time learning your craft before you can show your face on the big deals.

Associates have different responsibilities than analysts. Analysts need to be able to crunch numbers and put together stuff accurately and quickly. Associates need to be able to understand and think about deals. For example, an analyst can build the model to figure out whether LBO debt can be paid down during a given period. An associate needs to be able to figure out whether the company has a realistic shot at generating projected cash flows. The analyst just needs to crunch the numbers, the associate needs to understand whether the numbers make sense, have some ideas about how far to push the numbers and perhaps have some advice on how the company can improve the numbers. That said, I have heard horror stories of MDs who treat analysts and associates as interchangeable disposable resources. Firm culture can make a huge difference.

Which brings me to my disclaimer. Most of what I say about banking pertains to the now defunct independent broker model. Bear is gone, Lehman is gone, Merrill is now under a CEO who last year wanted to kill investment banking within his own firm and last week said he wouldn't pay Wall Street salaries to bankers (great retention plan sir), Morgan may well be a dead-man-walking and Goldman is now taking deposits!?!? Hard to say exactly what the life of an associate will be like going forward. Do you guys think orientation for new associates will now include bank teller training?
User avatar
pelihu
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Last visit: 11 Jan 2010
Posts: 2,208
Own Kudos:
526
 [1]
Schools:Darden
Posts: 2,208
Kudos: 526
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dominion
Pelihu, can you give us a commentary on the i-banking career path as a top MBA graduating in this tumult?

I'll address thehizzle's questions first. The answer is that those are the things that they teach you in business school. By the second year, most analysts know all there is to know about modeling and putting together the basics of a deal - but few are promoted directly to the associate level. The reason is that they don't understand have a good enough understanding of how businesses make money. At business school, you'll learn about operations, marketing, quantitative analysis, leadership, organizational behavior, and things like that. These are the tools that will allow you to be more than an analysts at an investment bank. To give you my own experience, we only spent 3-4 classes (out of 30) in our finance class working on models, and perhaps 2 accounting classes working on the financial statements. We spent the rest of the time working on cases that examine how these aspects play together, and had additional classes to combine learning in marketing & finance or operations & accounting. I believe that these skills are why banks tend to recruit at just a few schools; many of the lower ranked schools spend a lot more time on the basics but at the top places you'll be expected to learn the basics on your own (or in a pre-term or something) and spend the real class time digging deeper.

The banking career path has changed a lot - since the end of the summer and perhaps even more so in the past few weeks. Very few offers were handed out to second year students. Earlier on, many of the middle-market banks said that they were going to be opportunistic and increase hiring to get some superstars (or was it rock stars) that who wouldn't normally consider their firms. Then, the market went stupid the last two weeks (even more stupid than before), and even the smaller firms that do not put their own balance sheets at risk started canceling interviews. In fact, several canceled here after hosting several events and releasing their closed lists. There are still a few firms coming to campus, though it remains to be seen how much hiring they will do.

The other reality is that the business of banking has changed a lot as well. There are many good reasons to believe that banking salaries will not approach the highs of recent times for many many years (increased regulation, decreased profitability, general economic slow-down, decreased competition for talent). Hedge funds and private equity shops will be under as much or more pressure in the near term, with hedge fund redemptions and the associated sell-off as perhaps the greatest threat to the financial system right now. I'm still a believer that the finance industry will turn around at some point, though it now looks like it might take 5-6 years rather than 1-2. The select few who are able to weather the storm will be in position when the economy recovers. I think the next rise in finance will be larger than any we've known - it will be on a global scale so if you want to be in finance, it wouldn't hurt to learn Chinese.

So, what to do right now if you want a career in finance. Well, those currently in school have a few choices. Some (perhaps 25% of normal) will still be heading to investment banks. Others should find jobs that jobs with great learning opportunities so they can keep their skills current and maintain ties to the industry. Things like the corporate finance department of a firm with lots of cash to do deals (say Microsoft) would be a good choice. Consulting firms with strong finance or private equity practices would be good as well (these people will have all the connections when banks come knocking in 5 years).

For those who aren't already in school (and perhaps for first year students), I think that middle market banks are a good choice. They are in position to grab a lot of market share (lots of competitors died), and I believe that as the economy delevers these firms will actually be very business over the next few years. Many companies will realize they need to raise cash to survive; credit will be expensive even if available to their only alternative will be to sell off a division or something like that. That's middle-market banking right there. One or more of these places will rise up to fill in some of the gap left by Lehman, Bear, Merrill, Wachovia and others.

We just had a meeting with the COO of Tudor Investments (also the head of Darden's Board of Trustee's), a huge hedge fund, on Thursday. He thought that there would be huge regulatory changes (especially with the election coming up) and that it would be a lot tougher in the coming years and that we were probably looking at about 5 years for a full turnaround (the people bandying about 10 years are on crack, the economy doesn't work like that). Another board member, Hank Paulson's first hire at Goldman, said about the same thing. If you like the finance, find a way to stay in the game at this point because as you build your career finance will be back, and the next time around you'll get to play in a global marketplace with opportunities like we've never seen.

If there's any recommendation I have, it would be to get to a place that does deals (or analyzes and consults on them). Don't go to some place that just bounces their own numbers around internally. If you go to a corporation, get to a place that's looking at acquisitions and things like that; don't go to a place where your main duty is to balance a budget or prepare a financial statement every quarter (don't get met started on Sarbanes Oxley). When banks start scouring for talent 5 years from now, they aren't going to care if you've saved your company a pile of money by identifying some problem; but they will be all over you if you have deal experience.
User avatar
Ozmba
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Last visit: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 953
Own Kudos:
Location: New York
Posts: 953
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Pelihu! Great article
avatar
thehizzle
Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Last visit: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow - this is incredible...

Thanks for all this insight, Pelihu!

Thehizzle

pelihu
dominion
Pelihu, can you give us a commentary on the i-banking career path as a top MBA graduating in this tumult?

I'll address thehizzle's questions first. The answer is that those are the things that they teach you in business school. By the second year, most analysts know all there is to know about modeling and putting together the basics of a deal - but few are promoted directly to the associate level. The reason is that they don't understand have a good enough understanding of how businesses make money. At business school, you'll learn about operations, marketing, quantitative analysis, leadership, organizational behavior, and things like that. These are the tools that will allow you to be more than an analysts at an investment bank. To give you my own experience, we only spent 3-4 classes (out of 30) in our finance class working on models, and perhaps 2 accounting classes working on the financial statements. We spent the rest of the time working on cases that examine how these aspects play together, and had additional classes to combine learning in marketing & finance or operations & accounting. I believe that these skills are why banks tend to recruit at just a few schools; many of the lower ranked schools spend a lot more time on the basics but at the top places you'll be expected to learn the basics on your own (or in a pre-term or something) and spend the real class time digging deeper.

The banking career path has changed a lot - since the end of the summer and perhaps even more so in the past few weeks. Very few offers were handed out to second year students. Earlier on, many of the middle-market banks said that they were going to be opportunistic and increase hiring to get some superstars (or was it rock stars) that who wouldn't normally consider their firms. Then, the market went stupid the last two weeks (even more stupid than before), and even the smaller firms that do not put their own balance sheets at risk started canceling interviews. In fact, several canceled here after hosting several events and releasing their closed lists. There are still a few firms coming to campus, though it remains to be seen how much hiring they will do.

The other reality is that the business of banking has changed a lot as well. There are many good reasons to believe that banking salaries will not approach the highs of recent times for many many years (increased regulation, decreased profitability, general economic slow-down, decreased competition for talent). Hedge funds and private equity shops will be under as much or more pressure in the near term, with hedge fund redemptions and the associated sell-off as perhaps the greatest threat to the financial system right now. I'm still a believer that the finance industry will turn around at some point, though it now looks like it might take 5-6 years rather than 1-2. The select few who are able to weather the storm will be in position when the economy recovers. I think the next rise in finance will be larger than any we've known - it will be on a global scale so if you want to be in finance, it wouldn't hurt to learn Chinese.

So, what to do right now if you want a career in finance. Well, those currently in school have a few choices. Some (perhaps 25% of normal) will still be heading to investment banks. Others should find jobs that jobs with great learning opportunities so they can keep their skills current and maintain ties to the industry. Things like the corporate finance department of a firm with lots of cash to do deals (say Microsoft) would be a good choice. Consulting firms with strong finance or private equity practices would be good as well (these people will have all the connections when banks come knocking in 5 years).

For those who aren't already in school (and perhaps for first year students), I think that middle market banks are a good choice. They are in position to grab a lot of market share (lots of competitors died), and I believe that as the economy delevers these firms will actually be very business over the next few years. Many companies will realize they need to raise cash to survive; credit will be expensive even if available to their only alternative will be to sell off a division or something like that. That's middle-market banking right there. One or more of these places will rise up to fill in some of the gap left by Lehman, Bear, Merrill, Wachovia and others.

We just had a meeting with the COO of Tudor Investments (also the head of Darden's Board of Trustee's), a huge hedge fund, on Thursday. He thought that there would be huge regulatory changes (especially with the election coming up) and that it would be a lot tougher in the coming years and that we were probably looking at about 5 years for a full turnaround (the people bandying about 10 years are on crack, the economy doesn't work like that). Another board member, Hank Paulson's first hire at Goldman, said about the same thing. If you like the finance, find a way to stay in the game at this point because as you build your career finance will be back, and the next time around you'll get to play in a global marketplace with opportunities like we've never seen.

If there's any recommendation I have, it would be to get to a place that does deals (or analyzes and consults on them). Don't go to some place that just bounces their own numbers around internally. If you go to a corporation, get to a place that's looking at acquisitions and things like that; don't go to a place where your main duty is to balance a budget or prepare a financial statement every quarter (don't get met started on Sarbanes Oxley). When banks start scouring for talent 5 years from now, they aren't going to care if you've saved your company a pile of money by identifying some problem; but they will be all over you if you have deal experience.
User avatar
togafoot
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Last visit: 29 Jul 2014
Posts: 983
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) - Class of 2010
Schools: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) - Class of 2010
Posts: 983
Kudos: 145
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pelihu
dominion
Pelihu, can you give us a commentary on the i-banking career path as a top MBA graduating in this tumult?
I think the next rise in finance will be larger than any we've known - it will be on a global scale so if you want to be in finance, it wouldn't hurt to learn Chinese.

This is very true. Where I am based for my MBA, the Chinese banks are still recruiting heavily. However, learning the language is not enough, you also need to learn the culture. The way business is done in China is different to the West, personal relationships are most important, more important than the business itself, so when tryingto find capital, investors or just trying to make a deal, if you have no way of getting to know the other side first, you have very little chance of making a deal. Yes, this is true of the corporate world as well, including hedge funds, PE et al.
User avatar
maverick2011
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Last visit: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
Posts: 296
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pelihu,

Correct me if I am wrong, but there are other opportunities to learn modeling. Most schools' finance/IB clubs host "Training the Street" sessions to learn modeling. Additionally, case competitions with other schools (the M&A case challenge between Kellogg and Chicago is an example) provide a platform for practical financial modeling experience before starting an internship.

This information is based on my conversations with current students at various top schools.
User avatar
collegesenior
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Last visit: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
Schools:MIT
Posts: 190
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Found this interesting:
MBA students lower their career projections
https://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 5378.story
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
collegesenior
Found this interesting:
MBA students lower their career projections
https://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 5378.story

Wonderful article. +1
User avatar
3underscore
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 1,428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Posts: 1,428
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
togafoot

This is very true. Where I am based for my MBA, the Chinese banks are still recruiting heavily. However, learning the language is not enough, you also need to learn the culture. The way business is done in China is different to the West, personal relationships are most important, more important than the business itself, so when tryingto find capital, investors or just trying to make a deal, if you have no way of getting to know the other side first, you have very little chance of making a deal. Yes, this is true of the corporate world as well, including hedge funds, PE et al.

Sounds very much like the Baronial Age of Investment Banking which lasted until about 1907 (the old Merchant Banking Gentlemans code etc).
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was wondering if anyone could shine some light on how the material posted on this thread changes due to the current financial crisis?
User avatar
3underscore
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 1,428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Posts: 1,428
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
89nk
I was wondering if anyone could shine some light on how the material posted on this thread changes due to the current financial crisis?

Most people don't get bonuses, many people don't have jobs.
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
89nk
I was wondering if anyone could shine some light on how the material posted on this thread changes due to the current financial crisis?

I think the guidance on the Street is that most people in the investment banking divisions are expecting around 50% of what they got last year in bonus.

https://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/ ... port-says/
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Some news from the Morgan Stanley camp:

https://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/ ... s-changed/
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts