Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MJ2009
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 May 2008
Last visit: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Schools:LBS
Posts: 135
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ashaker
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Last visit: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
Schools:HBS Stanford Kellogg Wharton Tuck MIT Sloan
Posts: 169
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Paradosso
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Last visit: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Milan
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, VC
Schools:Wharton, LBS, UChicago, Kellogg MMM (Donald Jacobs Scholarship), Stanford, HBS
Posts: 254
Kudos: 143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I found the Michael Lewis article via wunderkind Ben Casnocha's blog.

Ben elaborates on Lewis's points with a twist to young professionals (he's 21 btw). His mini-essay is worth reading, as is everything that he (and Lewis) writes.

https://ben.casnocha.com/2008/12/why-so- ... lling.html
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maverick2011
pelihu
...It's really tough for career switchers to get into S&T...

Engineers/mathematicians/etc are valued in S&T, specifically trading. At least that is my understanding.

Is it because S&T is more quant based? Pelihu, can you provide me some insight on why you said that this role would be repetitive?
User avatar
foodstamp
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Last visit: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
Schools:HBS Class of 2011
Posts: 313
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would check out the following 2 sites:

leveragedsellout.com

and

wallstreetoasis.com

Tons of people from the industry read and post there. As soon as bonus time comes around, everybody on there posts rumored numbers and then the bonuses they actually receive.
User avatar
nink
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 548
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q44 V50
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 782
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
89nk

Is it because S&T is more quant based?

My former undergrad classmates are currently traders at large investment banks. A lot of them weren't that advanced in quant.

For example, this one kid bombed econometrics class because he just didn't get the models.

However, he went on an interview for Lehman Brothers Operations interview and kept harrassing the HR lady until she agreed to set him up an interview with one of their traders (just so he would stop emailing her).

During the interview, he was just quick on his feet with his answers (showing some street smarts and candor)...and he was offered a slot in their training program. Currently he still works as a derivatives trader at Barclays.

In my opinion, one can enter S&T as long as they can make snap decisions and "sound" intelligent....
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ninkorn
89nk

Is it because S&T is more quant based?

My former undergrad classmates are currently traders at large investment banks. A lot of them weren't that advanced in quant.

For example, this one kid bombed econometrics class because he just didn't get the models.

However, he went on an interview for Lehman Brothers Operations interview and kept harrassing the HR lady until she agreed to set him up an interview with one of their traders (just so he would stop emailing her).

During the interview, he was just quick on his feet with his answers (showing some street smarts and candor)...and he was offered a slot in their training program. Currently he still works as a derivatives trader at Barclays.

In my opinion, one can enter S&T as long as they can make snap decisions and "sound" intelligent....

I think I can do this. Make up quick BS look like gold and smell like roses. Something I do on a daily basis. :lol:
User avatar
madeinafrica
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2012
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Affiliations: ?
Location: Africa/Europe
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance, Strategy
Schools:Kellogg; Ross ($$); Tuck
Posts: 131
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey,
I've been reading this thread since I started the B-school journey... sad that Pelihu is no longer there in Club to give such awsome insights.

Can any other insider comment on this? how things have evolved since 2008 in the banking industry? What has really changed? has the gap left by Lemann, Bear, ... been filled?
Is it harder than before to switch into banking?

Nink? any one?


pelihu

I'll address thehizzle's questions first. The answer is that those are the things that they teach you in business school. By the second year, most analysts know all there is to know about modeling and putting together the basics of a deal - but few are promoted directly to the associate level. The reason is that they don't understand have a good enough understanding of how businesses make money. At business school, you'll learn about operations, marketing, quantitative analysis, leadership, organizational behavior, and things like that. These are the tools that will allow you to be more than an analysts at an investment bank. To give you my own experience, we only spent 3-4 classes (out of 30) in our finance class working on models, and perhaps 2 accounting classes working on the financial statements. We spent the rest of the time working on cases that examine how these aspects play together, and had additional classes to combine learning in marketing & finance or operations & accounting. I believe that these skills are why banks tend to recruit at just a few schools; many of the lower ranked schools spend a lot more time on the basics but at the top places you'll be expected to learn the basics on your own (or in a pre-term or something) and spend the real class time digging deeper.

The banking career path has changed a lot - since the end of the summer and perhaps even more so in the past few weeks. Very few offers were handed out to second year students. Earlier on, many of the middle-market banks said that they were going to be opportunistic and increase hiring to get some superstars (or was it rock stars) that who wouldn't normally consider their firms. Then, the market went stupid the last two weeks (even more stupid than before), and even the smaller firms that do not put their own balance sheets at risk started canceling interviews. In fact, several canceled here after hosting several events and releasing their closed lists. There are still a few firms coming to campus, though it remains to be seen how much hiring they will do.

The other reality is that the business of banking has changed a lot as well. There are many good reasons to believe that banking salaries will not approach the highs of recent times for many many years (increased regulation, decreased profitability, general economic slow-down, decreased competition for talent). Hedge funds and private equity shops will be under as much or more pressure in the near term, with hedge fund redemptions and the associated sell-off as perhaps the greatest threat to the financial system right now. I'm still a believer that the finance industry will turn around at some point, though it now looks like it might take 5-6 years rather than 1-2. The select few who are able to weather the storm will be in position when the economy recovers. I think the next rise in finance will be larger than any we've known - it will be on a global scale so if you want to be in finance, it wouldn't hurt to learn Chinese.

So, what to do right now if you want a career in finance. Well, those currently in school have a few choices. Some (perhaps 25% of normal) will still be heading to investment banks. Others should find jobs that jobs with great learning opportunities so they can keep their skills current and maintain ties to the industry. Things like the corporate finance department of a firm with lots of cash to do deals (say Microsoft) would be a good choice. Consulting firms with strong finance or private equity practices would be good as well (these people will have all the connections when banks come knocking in 5 years).

For those who aren't already in school (and perhaps for first year students), I think that middle market banks are a good choice. They are in position to grab a lot of market share (lots of competitors died), and I believe that as the economy delevers these firms will actually be very business over the next few years. Many companies will realize they need to raise cash to survive; credit will be expensive even if available to their only alternative will be to sell off a division or something like that. That's middle-market banking right there. One or more of these places will rise up to fill in some of the gap left by Lehman, Bear, Merrill, Wachovia and others.

We just had a meeting with the COO of Tudor Investments (also the head of Darden's Board of Trustee's), a huge hedge fund, on Thursday. He thought that there would be huge regulatory changes (especially with the election coming up) and that it would be a lot tougher in the coming years and that we were probably looking at about 5 years for a full turnaround (the people bandying about 10 years are on crack, the economy doesn't work like that). Another board member, Hank Paulson's first hire at Goldman, said about the same thing. If you like the finance, find a way to stay in the game at this point because as you build your career finance will be back, and the next time around you'll get to play in a global marketplace with opportunities like we've never seen.

If there's any recommendation I have, it would be to get to a place that does deals (or analyzes and consults on them). Don't go to some place that just bounces their own numbers around internally. If you go to a corporation, get to a place that's looking at acquisitions and things like that; don't go to a place where your main duty is to balance a budget or prepare a financial statement every quarter (don't get met started on Sarbanes Oxley). When banks start scouring for talent 5 years from now, they aren't going to care if you've saved your company a pile of money by identifying some problem; but they will be all over you if you have deal experience.
   1   2   3   4 
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts