Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 07:24 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 07:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 214
Own Kudos [?]: 1622 [7]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1021
Own Kudos [?]: 1726 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 214
Own Kudos [?]: 1622 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 310
Own Kudos [?]: 3792 [0]
Given Kudos: 412
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE:Business Development (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
Please explain ABE options also :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 214
Own Kudos [?]: 1622 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
RaviChandra wrote:
Please explain ABE options also :)


All the other options are wrong due to one of the two reasons listed...
"have seen"/"had witnessed" - A and B gone
present perfect tense "have" with future present "will have" - E gone

I'd chosen C for this answer :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Chicago, IL
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
I chose C for parrallelism. The way the sentenence conveys the meaning, there is no reason to assume that one event occured before the other. So, past participle is incorrect in this case period. The only question is the negative structure "Have not" is always inseparable for it to be gramatically correct? Any help on this.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
Even I would have chosen C .. Don't ask me why, just felt that it sounded right .. Anyone there to explain the difference between C and D?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 634
Own Kudos [?]: 3223 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
1
Kudos
D for me.

We need 'have' because the action of not seeing any evidence and not personally witnessing has been going on in his forty years of experience. Usage of 'had' will be incorrect here because 'had' means the action has already happened before some other action (which is not the case here).

Also, adverb --> modifier to a verb, an adverb, a clause, a phrase, a sentence, an adjective.

'personally' should be a modifier to 'witnessed'

I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence but I had personally not witnessed it once in my forty years of experience.

(A) I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence, but I had personally not witnessed it once in my forty years of experience.

(B) I had seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence but I have not personally witnessed it once in my forty years of experience.

(C) I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence but I have personally not witnessed it once in my forty years of experience.

(D) I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence but I have not personally witnessed it once in my forty years of experience. - CORRECT

(E) I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic self in American corporations; I won't deny its existence but I will have not personally witnessed it once in my forty years of experience.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 447 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
Got tense right.. present perfect.. bt fell for C.. thanks i understand now, Answer should be D
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 343 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
C and D are so close... C sounded right to me... But seems D is it...

Is it a rule or sthg that "have" and "not" should not have anything in between them?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Status:Target MBA
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: Singapore
GMAT 2: 640  Q49  V28
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
gmattokyo wrote:
Practice...


I was stuck between C and D.
Since meaning is not changed by moving the modifier 'personally', I agree that (D) is better option.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Status:Flying over the cloud!
Posts: 380
Own Kudos [?]: 1547 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
I also choose D, but my reason is that the adverb personally is nearest to the verb it should modify. So, only choice D is appropriate in term of tense, structure, and meanings.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17211
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: I have seen very little evidence of the expression of the authentic se [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne