GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 22 Jan 2020, 02:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Posts: 167

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 14:40
13
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (01:26) correct 52% (01:28) wrong based on 197 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD
(2) AB+CD=BC+DA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60566

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 15:51
tt11234 wrote:
If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

1.AC is perpendicular to BD
2.AB+CD=BC+DA

If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD. The diagonals are perpendicular to each other: ABCD could be a kite (answer NO), a rhombus (answer YES) or a square, which is just a special type of rhombus (answer YES). Not sufficient.

(2) AB+CD=BC+DA. The sum of opposite sides are equal. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) ABCD could be a kite (see the diagram below) - answer NO or a square/rhombus - answer YES. Not sufficient.

Attachments

images.jpg [ 5.43 KiB | Viewed 17666 times ]

_________________
##### General Discussion
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 899
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 08:16
+1 E
Imagine a kite, and you will have the answer
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1525
Concentration: Finance

### Show Tags

11 May 2014, 06:04
Nice. Can figure also be an isosceles trapezoid?

For statement 1 we have that diagonals are perpendicular

For statement 2 we have that the sum of the bases equal to sum of the legs

Therefore E

Cheers!
J
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2015
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2015, 05:04
Bunuel wrote:
tt11234 wrote:
If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

1.AC is perpendicular to BD
2.AB+CD=BC+DA

If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD. The diagonals are perpendicular to each other: ABCD could be a kite (answer NO), a rhombus (answer YES) or a square, which is just a special type of rhombus (answer YES). Not sufficient.

(2) AB+CD=BC+DA. The sum of opposite sides are equal. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) ABCD could be a kite (see the diagram below) - answer NO or a square/rhombus - answer YES. Not sufficient.

Hi Bunuel,

Thanks.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60566

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2015, 06:22
Bunuel wrote:
tt11234 wrote:
If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

1.AC is perpendicular to BD
2.AB+CD=BC+DA

If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD. The diagonals are perpendicular to each other: ABCD could be a kite (answer NO), a rhombus (answer YES) or a square, which is just a special type of rhombus (answer YES). Not sufficient.

(2) AB+CD=BC+DA. The sum of opposite sides are equal. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) ABCD could be a kite (see the diagram below) - answer NO or a square/rhombus - answer YES. Not sufficient.

Hi Bunuel,

Thanks.

The solution says that ABCD can be a kite.
_________________
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2481
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2015, 08:16
damn, please mention that the diagonals are perpendicular. I was thinking, how the hell can 2 different sides be perpendicular to each other? :D
1 - well, clearly insufficient.
2 - AB+CD=BC+DA - it might be a rectangle or a square, in which all sides are equal. not sufficient.

1+2 - it might be a square, or a quadrilateral consisting of 2 triangles, 2 small and 2 big right triangles 30-60-90, with hypotheses equal to each other. so insufficient.
CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2549
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2015, 08:26
mvictor wrote:
damn, please mention that the diagonals are perpendicular. I was thinking, how the hell can 2 different sides be perpendicular to each other? :D
1 - well, clearly insufficient.
2 - AB+CD=BC+DA - it might be a rectangle or a square, in which all sides are equal. not sufficient.

1+2 - it might be a square, or a quadrilateral consisting of 2 triangles, 2 small and 2 big right triangles 30-60-90, with hypotheses equal to each other. so insufficient.

It is given that ABCD is a quadrilateral and as AC is perpendicular to BD, it is implied that diagonals are perpendiculars. This is the usual interpretation. Why do you need it to be mentioned explicitly that "diagonals are perpendicular"?
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2481
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2015, 08:32
Engr2012 wrote:
mvictor wrote:
damn, please mention that the diagonals are perpendicular. I was thinking, how the hell can 2 different sides be perpendicular to each other? :D
1 - well, clearly insufficient.
2 - AB+CD=BC+DA - it might be a rectangle or a square, in which all sides are equal. not sufficient.

1+2 - it might be a square, or a quadrilateral consisting of 2 triangles, 2 small and 2 big right triangles 30-60-90, with hypotheses equal to each other. so insufficient.

It is given that ABCD is a quadrilateral and as AC is perpendicular to BD, it is implied that diagonals are perpendiculars. This is the usual interpretation. Why do you need it to be mentioned explicitly that "diagonals are perpendicular"?

IDK, I just spent additional seconds trying to figure out wtf is actually meant
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8437
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2015, 05:39
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD
(2) AB+CD=BC+DA

There are 5 variables (4 sides, 1 diagonal) in a quadrilateral, so we need 5 equations in order to solve the question, but only 2 equations are given from the 2 conditions, so there is high chance (E) will be our answer.
Even if we combine the 2 conditions together, they are insufficient, so (E) becomes the answer.

For cases where we need 3 more equation, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only \$79 for 1 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2015
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2015, 23:46
The solution says that ABCD can be a kite.[/quote]

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 691
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 21:13
tt11234 wrote:
If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD
(2) AB+CD=BC+DA

There's simply not enough because two diagonals being perpendicular does not mean the same thing as those diagonals being perpendicular bisectors. Bunuel am I right? Because if all we know is that two diagonals are perpendicular then the quadrilateral could be a kite, which graphically makes a lot of sense. However, if we know that the two diagonals bisect eachother, or more precisely are perpendicular bisectors, then we know for sure that that quadrilateral is a rhombus because the definition of a perpendicular bisector simply means cutting a quadrilateral into two equal pieces at 90 degrees. And that furthermore every square is a rhombus but not all rhombuses are squares?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60566

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 21:32
Nunuboy1994 wrote:
tt11234 wrote:
If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?

(1) AC is perpendicular to BD
(2) AB+CD=BC+DA

There's simply not enough because two diagonals being perpendicular does not mean the same thing as those diagonals being perpendicular bisectors. Bunuel am I right? Because if all we know is that two diagonals are perpendicular then the quadrilateral could be a kite, which graphically makes a lot of sense. However, if we know that the two diagonals bisect eachother, or more precisely are perpendicular bisectors, then we know for sure that that quadrilateral is a rhombus because the definition of a perpendicular bisector simply means cutting a quadrilateral into two equal pieces at 90 degrees. And that furthermore every square is a rhombus but not all rhombuses are squares?

A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides equal in length.
A square is a quadrilateral with all sides equal in length and all interior angles right angles.

Thus a rhombus is not a square unless the angles are all right angles.
A square however is a rhombus since all four of its sides are of the same length.
_________________
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13994

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2020, 07:38
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: If ABCD is a quadrilateral, is AB=BC=CD=DA ?   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2020, 07:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by