Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:04 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,157
Own Kudos:
1,941
 [10]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
Posts: 1,157
Kudos: 1,941
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DinoPen
Joined: 02 Jul 2019
Last visit: 09 Jun 2023
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
227
 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V28
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 300
Kudos: 696
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chillbrorelax
Joined: 13 Aug 2018
Last visit: 23 Oct 2021
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
196
 [4]
Given Kudos: 68
Posts: 75
Kudos: 196
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Notice that the stimulus presents multiple conditional statements. In such cases, inference would mean to connect the conditions to find must be true case. I will use some notations to make these conditions appear more clearly.

not M = regulations prohibit establishing monopolies
MCC = more cable companies enter market to provide their services
MCH = consumers have more cable companies to choose from
ALE = consumers able to choose the least expensive
VC = Vendors compete on price and services
RP + BS = Reduced prices, better services

not M -> MCC
MCH -> ALE
MCH -> VC -> RP+BS


We shall expect an answer derived from one of these conditions.
A. The government should prohibit cable companies from establishing monopolies.
This is a classic trap that presents a condition as an assertion. Notice that the author did not make any claims. The stimulus contains only a set of statements. Eliminate.

B. Competition in an industry sometimes leads to lower pricing.
We can easily see that this is related to third condition we have seen above. Let's keep this.

C. Not all industries would see improvement in customer service if there were more vendors in the industry.
This a broad conclusion. "Industries" is too big a domain to mention "cable companies". But since "improvement in customer service" and "more venders" are present in the stimulus, let's keep this as well.

D. Customers will always choose the least expensive provider of a service.
Another trap answer: extreme answer choice. This variable is bound in a condition, so we cannot state that customers will "always" choose the least expensive. Eliminate.

E. The cable company, which presently holds a monopoly, will improve its customer service if other companies are allowed to provide cable services in the same market.
Present situation is not described in the stimulus at all. Eliminate.

Now we shall compare the two options B, and C.
Notice that C states a broad conclusion. Moreover, as we try to confirm with the conditional statements given, we find that MCC is not directly connected to BS. Instead, it is MCH that is connected with BS. Hence, this information could be true.

Whereas, B states a conclusion that can be readily be confirmed. VC -> RP. In this statement, "an industry" is again used to describe "cable companies", but the statement mentions "sometimes" to balance this out. Conclusion does NOT needs to mention both RP and BS. Hence, eliminate C. IMO, B is the answer.
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The government should prohibit cable companies from establishing monopolies.
This is not explicitly stated in the passage , only the demerits is portrayed in the passage there might be cases where monopolies might be useful-Hence out

B. Competition in a industry sometimes leads to lower pricing.
This is an exact reasoning that can be infered from the passage -Hence in

C. Not all industries would see improvement in customer service if there were more vendors in the industry.
This is thoroughly out of contest and cannot be infered from the given passage -hence out

D. Customers will always choose the least expensive provider of a service.
Similar reasoning as C -Hence out

E. The cable company, which presently holds a monopoly, will improve its customer service if other companies are allowed to provide cable services in the same market
May be the cable opreaters might completly shut down their operations and might not provide cable operations -Hence out
Therefore IMO B
User avatar
sssanskaar
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 09 Oct 2022
Posts: 221
Own Kudos:
119
 [3]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Posts: 221
Kudos: 119
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I can see one issue in the reasoning of others who have mentioned that option E is incorrect only because it is stating the scenario in the current time while the argument is stating a hypothetical scenario. I don't think that is correct because option E has explicitly mentioned that the current scenario is following/having all the details mentioned in the hypothetical scenario of the argument.

Having said that, option E is definitely wrong because the argument states the vendors will COMPETE for prices and customer service, not that a particular vendor will DEFINITELY REDUCE prices or IMPROVE customer service.
One good example of this case is in: https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-governmen ... l#p2829757
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts