Jun 16 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+). AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Jun 18 09:00 PM EDT  10:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, June 18th at 9 pm ET Jun 18 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Send along your receipt from another course or book to info@empowergmat.com and EMPOWERgmat will give you 50% off the first month of access OR $50 off the 3 Month Plan Only available to new students Ends: June 18th Jun 19 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Jun 22 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jun 23 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 75

If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 28 Apr 2016, 14:30
Question Stats:
50% (02:13) correct 50% (02:06) wrong based on 327 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p? (1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0 i did it in this way: Question : p(qr1)<o P<0 or qr< 1 ?
combined both statements say that p<0 So according to the logic above, why answer C (both ) is not sufficient ?
Anybody ? Thanks
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by tinki on 07 Feb 2011, 11:18.
Last edited by Bunuel on 28 Apr 2016, 14:30, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question and added the OA




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55618

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Feb 2011, 11:49
tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p? (1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
i did it in this way: Question : p(qr1)<o P<0 or qr< 1 ?
combined both statements say that p<0 So according to the logic above, why answer C (both ) is not sufficient ?
Anybody ? Thanks What does "C (both ) is not sufficient" mean? Anyway: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?Given: \(p<q\) and \(p<r\). Question: is \(pqr<p\)? > is \(p(qr1)<0\)? (1) pq < 0 > \(p\) and \(q\) have opposite signs, as given that \(p<q\) then \(p<0\) and \(q>0\) > as \(p<0\) then the question becomes whether \(qr1>0\) (in \(p(qr1)\) first multiple is negative  \(p<0\), so in order the product to be negative second multiple must be positive  \(qr1>0\)) > is \(qr>1\)? We know that \(q>0\) but all we know about \(r\) is that \(p<r\). Not sufficient. (2) pr < 0 > the same here: \(p\) and \(r\) have opposite signs, as given that \(p<r\) then \(p<0\) and \(r>0\) > as \(p<0\) then the question becomes whether \(qr1>0\) > is \(qr>1\)? We know that \(r>0\) but all we know about \(q\) is that \(p<q\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) we have that: \(p<0\), \(q>0\) and \(r>0\). Again question becomes: is \(qr>1\)? Though both \(q\) and \(r\) are positive their product still can be more than 1 (for example \(q=1\) and \(r=2\)) as well as less then 1 (for example \(q=1\) and \(r=\frac{1}{3}\)) or even equal to 1. Not sufficient. Answer: E.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 75

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Feb 2011, 12:03
Bunuel wrote: tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p? (1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
i did it in this way: Question : p(qr1)<o P<0 or qr< 1 ?
combined both statements say that p<0 So according to the logic above, why answer C (both ) is not sufficient ?
Anybody ? Thanks What does "C (both ) is not sufficient" mean? Anyway: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?Given: \(p<q\) and \(p<r\). Question: is \(pqr<p\)? > is \(p(qr1)<0\)? (1) pq < 0 > \(p\) and \(q\) have opposite signs, as given that \(p<q\) then \(p<0\) and \(q>0\) > as \(p<0\) then the question becomes whether \(qr1>0\) (in \(p(qr1)\) first multiple is negative  \(p<0\), so in order the product to be negative second multiple must be positive  \(qr1>0\)) > is \(qr>1\)? We know that \(q>0\) but all we know about \(r\) is that \(p<r\). Not sufficient. (2) pr < 0 > the same here: \(p\) and \(r\) have opposite signs, as given that \(p<r\) then \(p<0\) and \(r>0\) > as \(p<0\) then the question becomes whether \(qr1>0\) > is \(qr>1\)? We know that \(r>0\) but all we know about \(q\) is that \(p<q\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) we have that: \(p<0\), \(q>0\) and \(r>0\). Again question becomes: is \(qr>1\)? Though both \(q\) and \(r\) are positive their product still can be more than 1 (for example \(q=1\) and \(r=2\)) as well as less then 1 (for example \(q=1\) and \(r=\frac{1}{3}\)) or even equal to 1. Not sufficient. Answer: E. aha, Got it. i was making some stupid assumptions. (as always ) + Kudo for the best explanation and swift response thanks again



Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 209
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2011, 15:26
I couldn't find it when I searched for it. Thank you, Bunuel!
_________________
Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!
"It always seems impossible until its done." Nelson Mandela



Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 706

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Apr 2011, 20:21
1) Insufficient. Does not preclude r from being zero
2) Insufficient. Does not preclude q from being zero
1) + 2)
Consider p ve and q and r +ve.
let p = 1. q = 2 r = 3. The answer is YES let p = 1. q = 0.5 r = 0.6. The answer is NO
Insufficient. Hence E



Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1367
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Apr 2011, 22:07
The question asks : pqr  p < 0 => p(qr  1) < 0 => either p < 0 and qr > 1 or p > 0 and qr < 1 From (1) it can be seen that q > 0 and p < 0 But no information about r, hence insufficient e.g. if 0 < r < 1 or if r < 0 and 0 < q < 1, then qr < 1 From (2), pr < 0 => r > 0 and p < 0 But no information about q, hence insufficient e.g. if r > 1 and then qr > 1 and the expression is true, but may not be so otherwise Combining (1) and (2) also, nothing is conclusive about qr, so answer is E.
_________________
Formula of Life > Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant) GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Intern
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 30
Location: United States
GPA: 3.62
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2011, 17:07
Restate the question stem: "is p(qr  1) < 0?" Statement 1) pq < 0 implies that pq != 0 and that p and q have different signs. Since p < q, p < 0 < q. Since p < 0, the question stem becomes "qr  1 > 0?", or "qr > 1?" We have deduced that q > 0, but nothing about r so the statement is insufficient. Yes example: {p,q,r} = {5, 2, 5} and pqr < p since (5)(2)(5) < (5) No example: {p,q,r} = {5, 1/2, 1} and pqr > p since (5)(1/2)(1) > (5) Statement 2) Similar to statement 1, pr < 0 implies that pr != 0 and that p and r have different signs. Since p < r, p < 0 < r. Since p < 0, the question stem becomes "qr  1 > 0?", or "qr > 1?", which cannot be answered without more information about q. The same yes/no examples from above can be used to illustrate this statement's insufficiency. Combined) The combined statements tell us that p < 0 < q and that p < 0 < r. Even with this information, the inequality qr > 1 can be true or false. Yes example: {p,q,r} = {5, 2, 5} and pqr < p since (5)(2)(5) < (5) No example: {p,q,r} = {5, 1/2, 1} and pqr > p since (5)(1/2)(1) > (5)



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1615

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Sep 2011, 13:46
bschool83 wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?
(1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0 If, from Statement 1, pq < 0, then one of p or q is negative, the other positive. Negative numbers are always smaller than positive numbers, so if p < q, then clearly p must be the negative number and q the positive number. We learn the same thing from Statement 2: p is negative, and r is positive. Now that we know that p is negative, we can rephrase the question by dividing by p on both sides, reversing the inequality when we do (because we're dividing by a negative) : Is pqr < p ? Is qr > 1 ? While we know q and r are positive, so qr > 0, we have no way to tell whether qr > 1. It might be that q = r = 2, and the answer is 'yes', or it might be that q = r = 1/2 and the answer is 'no'. So the answer is E.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2011
Posts: 9
GMAT Date: 02102012

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Dec 2011, 00:07
I got C. Did not consider fractions...assumed them as integers...



Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 282
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Dec 2011, 02:24
Straight E because 1) and 2) individually provide no information about one of the variables. Combined they dont provide information on magnitude.



Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 41

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2012, 09:58
Great explanation provided..



Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 126
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2012, 16:01
we need to see if the statement pqr is less than p, that is only the case if qr is a fraction or if pqr is a larger negative number. it seems that the question is more asking about if the term is more negative. stmt 1 . pq < 0 so p and q are opposite terms. nothing about r stmt 2. pr < 0 so q and r are opposite terms. nothing about q together we know that if p is positive q and r is negative which makes the term pqr a larger positive number or maybe even q and r are a fraction that makes it smaller we are unsure. if p is negative then q and r are positive but still we dont know if the the term qr is a fraction.
_________________
DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!



Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 187

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Apr 2012, 06:13
tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?
(1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
I did it quickly in following way... clearly A & B are not answers because we need info for all p,q,r 1) says p is ve and q is +ve 2) says p is ve and r is +ve Now q and r can be >1 or <1 ( no restriction on them) so pqr can be < or > p, Easy E



Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 14

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2013, 00:14
qIf p < q and p < r, is (p)(q)(r) < p?
(1) pq < 0
(2) pr < 0
while solving this problem I simplified the quesiton to pqrp<0 taking p as a common factor p(qr1)<0. so either p<0 or qr<1.
Now the question I have is  if I am able to prove one of the two i.e p<0 or qr<1 , then would that suffice to say that either of the options work. On these lines, I went and chose D as the answer. Mathematically is it correct to say p must be less than zero or qr must be less than one for pqr<p.
Logically when I try other values I do realize it does not fit in with the above line of thought and the answer is E. But can you help me understand what does it mean resolving from an algebra point of view?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55618

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2013, 00:20
gmatrant wrote: qIf p < q and p < r, is (p)(q)(r) < p?
(1) pq < 0
(2) pr < 0
while solving this problem I simplified the quesiton to pqrp<0 taking p as a common factor p(qr1)<0. so either p<0 or qr<1.
Now the question I have is  if I am able to prove one of the two i.e p<0 or qr<1 , then would that suffice to say that either of the options work. On these lines, I went and chose D as the answer. Mathematically is it correct to say p must be less than zero or qr must be less than one for pqr<p.
Logically when I try other values I do realize it does not fit in with the above line of thought and the answer is E. But can you help me understand what does it mean resolving from an algebra point of view? Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above. Please read carefully and follow: rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html Pay attention to the rule #3.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 16 May 2013
Posts: 1

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2013, 01:08
Hi, First thing i would like to tell you that you can't subtract the inequalities. Now lets come to the combination of the fact statements. In all these kind of Yes/ No D.S. questions always use numbers. lets plugin the numbers. p q r pqr ( is pqr<p) 1 1 1 1 No 2 1 2 4 Yes So even after combining both the fact statements we are not getting a definite answer, that's why the answers must be E. Tarun Kaushik Sr. Quant Faculty Princeton Review tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?
(1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
i did it in this way: Question : p(qr1)<o P<0 or qr< 1 ?
combined both statements say that p<0 So according to the logic above, why answer C (both ) is not sufficient ?
Anybody ? Thanks



Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 164
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30 GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2013, 03:16
p<q and p<r is pqr<p? 1. pq<0 since from the stem p has to be less than q, q is therefore positive and p is negative. This statement does not provide any information about r. Non sufficient 2. pr<0 same story here, the statement is conveying us once again that p is less than zero. Non sufficient 1+2) I find myself pretty comfortable plugging some numbers in and figuring out the outcome if p=2, q=2, r=1 > pqr<p. If p=0,5, q=0,5, r=0,5 >pqr>p Non sufficient. E.
_________________
learn the rules of the game, then play better than anyone else.



Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 186
Location: India
GPA: 2.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2014, 13:02
tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?
(1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
i did it in this way: Question : p(qr1)<o P<0 or qr< 1 ?
combined both statements say that p<0 So according to the logic above, why answer C (both ) is not sufficient ?
Anybody ? Thanks 1. pq < 0  Either of the two is negative and the other one positive. Two possible scenarios for p and q : ( +) and (+ ) 2. pr < 0  Either of the two is negative and the other one positive. Two possible scenarios for p and r : ( +) and (+ ) Combining the two: The value will be negative if p is negative and value will be positive if p is positive. But we don't know whether the product will be less than p, because we don't know the value of p, q, r So, insufficient. E
_________________
Give KUDOS if the post helps you...



Manager
Joined: 10 Oct 2018
Posts: 178
GPA: 4

If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2018, 22:24
tinki wrote: If p < q and p < r, is pqr < p?
(1) pq < 0 (2) pr < 0
Bunuel pls check whether my approach is right? pqr<p. Dividing both the sides by p. In short, we need to find is qr<1?In such questions, we need to prove that the statement is not sufficient especially by plugging in numbers. Stat(1) pq<0 We know p<q YES= 2*2=4<0 NO= 2*4=8 and not less than 0. NOT SUFFICIENT Stat (2) qr<1 We know p<r Plugged in similar numbers as in stat (1). NOT SUFFICIENT (1)+(2) Using the values that we used in both statements doesn't satisfy the question stem, qr<1 (that is pqr<p) So answer is option E.
_________________




If p<q and p<r, is pqr<p? (1) pq<0 (2) pr<0
[#permalink]
28 Nov 2018, 22:24






