Hey
GMATinsightI think 'I' is correct too.
Dimension of only other possible rectangle is
(1, 59*61). What you say?
GMATinsight
[quote="Bunuel"
]If the dimensions of a rectangle (in inches) is equal to a prime number that lies between 55 and 65, exclusive, which of the following statements must be true?
I. There is only one other rectangle that has integral dimensions and the same area as the given rectangle
II. There is only one other rectangle that has integral dimensions and the same perimeter as the given rectangle
III. The area of the given rectangle is 3599 square inches.
A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II only
E. None of the above
Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level QuestionsDimensions of rectangle = two of {59, 61}
i.e there is only one such Rectangle PossibleI. There is only one other rectangle that has integral dimensions and the same area as the given rectangle -
FALSEII. There is only one other rectangle that has integral dimensions and the same perimeter as the given rectangle -
FALSEIII. The area of the given rectangle is 3599 square inches. - Area =\(59*61 = 60^2-1^2 = 3599\)
- TRUEAnswer: Option C
[/quote]
nick1816Dimensions can be only prime numbers so 1 is not acceptable as dimension
I called that wrong because of word
Other in statement
"There is only one other rectangle..." while my claim is that there is only 1 rectangle possible no other rectangle.
Bunuel at one of the discussions brought the understanding that Length is always greater than the width and he quoted Oxford dictionary If I am not wrong.