Official Explanation
1. The comparison in the first sentence is meant to emphasize the
Difficulty Level: 600
Explanation
This is a logical structure question that asks what point is emphasized by the comparison in the first sentence. The sentence says that Niagara Falls, which is commonly regarded as a huge series of waterfalls, looks like a leaky faucet when compared to Iguacu Falls. This is certainly a negative comparison for Niagara and one that makes a point of how small Niagara is (and, potentially, how unattractive). So answer choice A is not a possibility, and B and C have nothing to do with the purpose of the comparison that we’ve just stated. That leaves C and E, and while E may be true or reasonable, the passage doesn’t give us support for it, certainly not in the first sentence.
Answer: C
2. The author’s attitude toward Iguacu Falls can best be described as which of the following?
Difficulty Level: 650
Explanation
This is a style/tone question asking for the author’s general attitude toward Iguacu Falls. We can tell from the many positive things the author says about Iguacu in the passage that it is a positive attitude. C and E are not positive enough and D is not positive at all, so they should be eliminated. Answer choice A is strongly positive, but there is no indication that the author is proud of Iguacu; “pride” is not reasonable because we have no reason to think that the author had any responsibility for any of the events in the passage, so it can be eliminated. So though B is probably a little weakerthan the tone of the passage, it is the best answer choice.
Answer: B
3. What can most reasonably be inferred from the information in the final two paragraphs?
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
This is an inference question focusing on the final two paragraphs. Answer choices B and C are reasonable enough to assume, but the passage doesn’t give any support for them. Answer choice D is also reasonable, but it goes farther in scope than the passage supports by saying “crucial” and “world ecosystem.” Answer choice E is not supported by the passage and the word “any” makes this an extreme, and therefore bad, answer. Answer choice A is the only good inference; if UNESCO elected to declare the falls a World Heritage Site for its protection, it is reasonable to infer that there might be a potential threat to its survival, particularly because of the large hydroelectric power site mentioned in the next-to-last paragraph.
Answer: A
4. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
Difficulty Level: 600
Explanation
This is a primary purpose/main idea question. Answer choice A is too broad in scope; the only waterfall site the author could be said to exalt in this passage is Iguacu Falls. Answer choice B is not supported by the passage, as very little of Iguacu Falls’ history was discussed. Answer choice D is somewhat supported because of the comparison to Niagara Falls at the beginning, but ultimately it is not the focus of the whole passage. Similarly, answer choice E is tempting because of the information in the last paragraph, but it is not the focus of the passage as a whole. Answer choice C is the best supported, as the author does spend the whole passage extolling the virtues of a natural phenomenon, Iguacu Falls.
Answer: C
Hope it helps