mikemcgarry wrote:
In 1865, the then-revolutionary sound of Wagner’s opera Tristan und Isolde was due to the relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord.”
(A) In 1865, the then-revolutionary sound of Wagner’s opera Tristan und Isolde was due to the relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord.”
(B) In 1865, Wagner created what was then a revolutionary sound in his opera Tristan und Isolde, this sound caused by the relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord.”
(C) In 1865, the relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord” was causing the the then-revolutionary sound of Wagner’s opera Tristan und Isolde.
(D) Because of the relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord,” Wagner’s 1865 opera, Tristan und Isolde, had a then-revolutionary sound.
(E) The relative atonality of the so-called “Tristan chord” has caused the then-revolutionary sound of Wagner’s 1865 opera Tristan und Isolde.This difficult SC question explores, among other things, the "
due to" structure. For a discussion of the use of this structure, as well as the OE for this particular question, see:
GMAT Sentence Correction: the “Due To” MistakeBy the way, Wagner's
Tristan und Isolde is one of my favorite operas! You can hear the famous "Tristan Chord" in the beginning of
the prelude to the opera.
Mike
A as well. (Although I am torn between A and D - because of vs. due to).
B) - I find it difficult to pinpoint why it is wrong, but to my ear it sounds awkward.
C) Illogical, how can relative atonality be causing the then revolutionary sound?
D) Had refers to having 2 events occurring in the same sentence with sequencing. To me, there seems to be no two events in the sentence that warrants 'had'.
E) Same reason as in C)
Looking forward to the OA and explanation!