>>>HERE IS THE EXPLANATION<<<Q1Answer Choice (B) is the correct choice. The passage discusses the history and implications of Andrew Johnson’s impeachment and acquittal. Only Answer Choice (B) properly captures this focus.
Choice (A) is far too broad. Although the impeachment of Andrew Johnson is the topic of the passage, the institution of impeachment itself is too broad a focus.
Choice (C) is a distortion. The end of paragraph 1 states that Johnson finished his term powerless and unpopular.
Choice (D) blows up a minor detail. Although Johnson’s role in Reconstruction is discussed briefly during the second paragraph, this is not the main focus of the passage.
Choice (E) is extreme. Although the passage does state that Johnson’s removal from office could potentially have subverted the presidency, the passage never asserts that it was Congress’ desire to do so. The only subversion discussed is Jefferson’s attempted subversion of the judiciary in 1804.
Q2Answer Choice (A) is the correct choice because it correctly infers from the first paragraph that when Johnson fired Stanton, he did so without Senate approval.Choice (B) goes too far. The passage only states that the Tenure of Office Act was designed to diminish the power of the president, not to specifically prevent Johnson from firing Stanton.
Choice (C) is unsupported. The passage never states that Johnson had abused his authority or fired other cabinet members in the past.
Choice (D) is also unsupported. Although the Tenure of Office Act did lead to Johnson’s impeachment, the passage never states that the Act was designed to do so. There’s no evidence that Congress had that much foresight.
Choice (E) is out of scope. Although the passage does state that previous presidents had been able to dismiss officials at their pleasure, the fate of subsequent presidents is never discussed.
Q3Answer Choice (D) is the correct choice. It is not true because the end of paragraph 2 states that Stanton, a radical Republican, was frequently in opposition to the rest of Johnson’s cabinet. You can infer from this that Johnson’s cabinet did not contain several other radical Republicans.Choice (A) is supported by paragraph 2; the passage states that Johnson sympathized with white Southerners, which outraged Republicans. Thus, we can infer that most Republicans did not sympathize with white southerners.
Choice (B) is also supported by paragraph 2; the passage states that Lincoln’s wartime administration was exceedingly powerful.
Choice (C) is supported by paragraph 2; the passage states that Johnson vetoed a great deal of Reconstruction legislation favored by radical Republicans.
Choice (E) is supported by paragraph 2. We can infer that because Republicans were able to override Johnson’s vetoes, they held a majority in Congress.
Q4Answer Choice (C) is the correct choice. The "triumph" of separation of powers in American government in the acquittals of Justice Chase and of President Johnson is the principal idea in the passage, and this idea is mentioned explicitly at the end of paragraph 1.Choice (A) is extreme. The passage never states that the authority of Congress should be weakened, only that the authority of the president should be upheld. Also, the author never goes so far as to refer to Jackson’s impeachment as an injustice.
Choice (B) severely distorts the passage. Although it’s true that the dominance of Republicans in Congress rendered Johnson essentially powerless, the author never implies that Johnson would have been a successful president if he had been given more power.
Choice (D) gives the author a stronger point of view than is presented in the passage. The author’s opinion regarding Reconstruction policy is never discussed.
Choice (E) is extreme. The passage never states exactly how much authority the author feels the president should have, only that the president’s authority should not be subverted by Congress simply because Congress doesn’t agree with his policies.
Q5Answer Choice (C) is the correct choice. The "triumph" of separation of powers in American government in the acquittals of Justice Chase and of President Johnson is the principal idea in the passage, and this idea is mentioned explicitly at the end of paragraph 1.Choice (A) is extreme. The passage never states that the authority of Congress should be weakened, only that the authority of the president should be upheld. Also, the author never goes so far as to refer to Jackson’s impeachment as an injustice.
Choice (B) severely distorts the passage. Although it’s true that the dominance of Republicans in Congress rendered Johnson essentially powerless, the author never implies that Johnson would have been a successful president if he had been given more power.
Choice (D) gives the author a stronger point of view than is presented in the passage. The author’s opinion regarding Reconstruction policy is never discussed.
Choice (E) is extreme. The passage never states exactly how much authority the author feels the president should have, only that the president’s authority should not be subverted by Congress simply because Congress doesn’t agree with his policies.[/size][/size]