Answers are in bold.
1) According to the passage, which of the following is used by Diamond as piece of evidence for his core thesis?
A) The fact that diseases were introduced by Europeans
B) The fact that deforestation resulted from animal behavior
C) The fact that cultures were unable to accurately predict the future
D) The fact that there was proper resource management
E) The fact that there was a natural depletion of food sources
Explanation of question 1
The question is asking what piece of evidence is core to his thesis, which means what is the central concept Jared is exploiting to reach his conclusion. They are 2 fold - 1. human recklessness, 2. lack of foresight. So any answer choice which encompasses this would be our answer.
A - diseases from Eastern Europe was used as a counter-point by Terry Hunt, not Diamond.
B - It was not animal behaviour, but of humans, according to Diamond.
C - Nice, this nicely sits with 'lack of foresight'. Keep this in.
D - There WASNT a proper resource management.
E - Not NATURAL, it was human-led according to Diamond.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2) The primary purpose of this passage is to:
A) Refute the opinion put forth in an important piece of research.
B) Call for more research to help evaluate a controversial position.
C) Analyze a significant research study and its implications.
D) Suggest that a particular research study is misguided.
E) Provide an addition to an existing study.
Explanation of question 2
The author first introduces Diamond's groundbreaking study about downfall of ancient societies. Then the author further probes into the study with a few examples of commonalities of different communities having the same fate. Finally he gives a counter-example to his theory by stating another scholar Terry Hunt and specifies the counter-argument. Now lets go to the options -
A - The primary purpose is not just to refute Diamond's work. There is so much more to that as specified in our quick summary above.
B - Thats not the main point, calling for more research.
C - Fits in perfect with our summary.
D - He does not take sides, he just presents one view and also presents a counter-viewpoint to that. In other words he analyzes.
E - Nope, not just that.
C is our answer.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3) According to the passage, which of the following must be true of Polynesian deforestation?
A) It was caused by predatory rats, and not by the actions of the Polynesian people as has been theorized.
B) It was cited by Terry Hunt as the cause of the demise of the Polynesians of Easter Island.
C) It was caused by the recklessness and lack of foresight of the Polynesian people.
D) It was used by Jared Diamond to illustrate how human recklessness can lead to the demise of a society.
E) It was surprisingly similar to the resource depletion that occurred in ancient Greenland.
Explanation of question 3
The question asks which is a MUST BE TRUE, not necessarily CAN BE TRUE. There is adifference!
A - It MAY be caused by rats, but cannot be definitively proven.
B - Terry Hunt opposed this viewpoint. Completely opposite answer.
C - This is the view point of Diamond. It is NOT definitively proven hence this situation is a MAY BE, not a must be true.
D - There you go, this option tells you that the opinion of one person (Diamond) was that. Cool, this is stated and therefore must be true.
E - It was not 'surprisingly' similar. Diamond was looking for a few similarities, if it existed. Look at what the author states - "Diamond’s work was among the first to seek out the commonalities between deforestation in Easter Island and resource depletion in ancient Greenland.". Understood the difference with the subtle play on words?
D is our answer.