GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 11 Dec 2018, 01:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Prep Hour

     December 11, 2018

     December 11, 2018

     09:00 PM EST

     10:00 PM EST

    Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Posts: 174
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V32
GPA: 4
In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2018, 04:03
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

33% (01:47) correct 67% (01:36) wrong based on 110 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who were reported to have died in the country during the first week of the year, compared with the first week of the previous ten years. There seems to be no reason to explain this disproportionately high number of deaths especially because the reports were widespread in the country and there was no epidemic spreading through the country at that point in time. Moreover, most of the deaths were not among the young and could not even be attributed to binge drinking in celebration of the new year.

Which of the following can then explain the discrepancy?

A. The government announced in 2008 that estate taxes, payable by the heirs on someone's death, would be abolished effective from the new year.
B. Astrologists predicted that 2009 was a good year to die in, for salvation of the soul.
C. The statistic is an anomaly that has no logical explanation.
D. The price of some cancer drugs and chemotherapy increased by 10% in January 2009, making treatment more expensive than before.
E. An earthquake in one of the cities during December 2008 made hospital care availability more difficult for regular illnesses.

Spoiler: :: OE
OFFICIAL SOLUTION

Option (B) does not seems to imply that people voluntarily died to satisfy the astrological predictions. Even if we were to accept that to be true, it does not explain why there was an increase in people dying right after the year begins. If the entire year is a good year to die in, why not die in December 2009?

The question asks for an explanation and saying that there is no valid explanation is no good. Option (C) can be eliminated.

Option (D) is an interesting, attractive option. However, the problem with the option is the timeline. If treatment became expensive only that year, why are people dying immediately? Could they not have done something to improve their health or sought other options?

Option (E) discusses only one city while the argument clearly states that this phenomenon was widespread and observed throughout the country. The option therefore, does not justify why the numbers went up in other parts of the country.

To understand why Option (A) works, understand that the argument does NOT state that the number of deaths went up but rather that the REPORTS went up. If option (A) is true and legal heirs do not have to pay any taxes from January 1, 2009, that would explain why the reports of deaths have gone up. Some people could have died in the last few days of 2008 and the heirs could have waited to report it. Also notice that the argument indicates that the reports were primarily about the older population.

_________________

Regards,

Vaibhav



Sky is the limit. 800 is the limit.

~GMAC

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 796
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Premium Member
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 08 Aug 2018, 13:28
vaibhav1221 wrote:
In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who were reported to have died in the country during the first week of the year, compared with the first week of the previous ten years. There seems to be no reason to explain this disproportionately high number of deaths especially because the reports were widespread in the country and there was no epidemic spreading through the country at that point in time. Moreover, most of the deaths were not among the young and could not even be attributed to binge drinking in celebration of the new year.

Which of the following can then explain the discrepancy?

A. The government announced in 2008 that estate taxes, payable by the heirs on someone's death, would be abolished effective from the new year.
B. Astrologists predicted that 2009 was a good year to die in, for salvation of the soul.
C. The statistic is an anomaly that has no logical explanation.
D. The price of some cancer drugs and chemotherapy increased by 10% in January 2009, making treatment more expensive than before.
E. An earthquake in one of the cities during December 2008 made hospital care availability more difficult for regular illnesses.



Although I am Inclined towards B :lol:

IMO-

between D and E

People suffering from cancer are already in a bad spot, increasing the price of some drugs makes their case even worse.
But is it possible to have a sharp increase ?

in E however

hospital care is difficult for even regular illnesses
might be the cause of sharp increase , as people are unable to treat what could have easily been treated.

E for me .

Originally posted by CounterSniper on 08 Aug 2018, 04:34.
Last edited by CounterSniper on 08 Aug 2018, 13:28, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Oct 2017
Posts: 10
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2018, 13:23
4
Imo A. The passage talks about increase in deaths reported..that doesn't necessarily mean an increase in actual number of deaths. A gives a reason to report more deaths. The other choices give general reasons for an increase in deaths throughout the year and not just the first week. Waiting for experts' opinions and OA.

Posted from my mobile device
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Feb 2015
Posts: 796
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Premium Member
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2018, 13:36
1
Saurabhminocha wrote:
Imo A. The passage talks about increase in deaths reported..that doesn't necessarily mean an increase in actual number of deaths. A gives a reason to report more deaths. The other choices give general reasons for an increase in deaths throughout the year and not just the first week. Waiting for experts' opinions and OA.

Posted from my mobile device



Kudo for you my friend !!
I think you are right !!
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2018, 05:51
1
vaibhav1221,

Your issue has been resolved for this post. Please note that to delete a post, you can just click the red x at the bottom of your post.

Please note that I also updated the format of the question to show an OE.

-- Mod Nightblade
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 19 Nov 2017
Posts: 174
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V32
GPA: 4
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2018, 06:01
nightblade354
Thanks for helping out. The 'X' sign wasn't there for some reason. That is why i reported the post, but thanks for the effort!
_________________

Regards,

Vaibhav



Sky is the limit. 800 is the limit.

~GMAC

CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2018, 06:07
vaibhav1221 wrote:
nightblade354
Thanks for helping out. The 'X' sign wasn't there for some reason. That is why i reported the post, but thanks for the effort!


That is good to know. If the problem persists, please reach out to Abhimahna
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who &nbs [#permalink] 09 Aug 2018, 06:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 2009, there was a sharp increase in the number of people who

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.