EducationAisle sir,
Please evaluate my reasoning.
Option A:- This is incorrect because the argument above does not talk anything about the impact of "Thank you" messages on regular and occasional patrons. The argument does not say that the impact leads to higher tipping. Hence, this is incorrect.
Option B:- This is the correct answer. When negated the conclusion breaks down. Regularly seeing "Thank you" would lead patrons to revert to their old habits. Hence, this would break the conclusion.
Option C:- No impact on our argument. The passage above does not draw a link between reminding and high tipping. Hence, this is incorrect.
Option D:- Incorrect. Varying tipping and restaurant expense does not have any impact on the high tipping. Plus when we negate this option statement we get " The rate varies with how expensive the restaurant is". So our conclusion still stands because we don't know whether that variation is towards the higher side or not. Hence, this cannot be assumed.
Option E:- This is an interesting one. I initially marked this one. This is irrelevant too because this restates the information already mentioned in the passage. How many people left a larger tip is not our concern. We concluded from the study that seeing a thank you leads to higher tipping. Out of all the people in the study all left a larger tip or 70 percent or 50 percent. It doesn't matter. The outcome is that we have concluded something from the study. Hence, this is the incorrect answer.
Please share your two cents on my reasoning above.
Thanks