Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
12 Aug 2019, 02:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
59% (01:27) correct
41%
(01:30)
wrong
based on 211
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(A) In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(B) In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, the documentaries from Montreal's sociologists are containing nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(C) Compared to that of the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(D) Compared to those produced by the Museum sociologists, the socially relevant documentaries of Montreal's sociologists are not even remotely groundbreaking.
(E) Compared to the Museum socially relevant documentaries, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(A) In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(B) In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, the documentaries from Montreal's sociologists are containing nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(C) Compared to that of the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
(D) Compared to those produced by the Museum sociologists, the socially relevant documentaries of Montreal's sociologists are not even remotely groundbreaking.
(E) Compared to the Museum socially relevant documentaries, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
13 Aug 2019, 01:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
This is a comparison question and the documentaries from museum directors is compared with the documentaries from Montreal sociologists. Each choice is described with what the error is.
In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
Per the meaning of this choice, the documentaries from Montreal's sociologists are (right now) containing nothing remotely groundbreaking. Futhermore, it is not logical that documentaries are containing something. so this choice is incorrect
that does not stand for anything in this sentence. so this is incorrect
Therefore D is the answer
In comparison with the socially relevant documentaries produced by the Museum directors, Montreal's sociologists have produced nothing even remotely groundbreaking.
Quote:
The socially relevant documentaries are illogically compared with Montreal's sociologists, so this can be eliminated
Quote:
Here the comparison is fine, socially relevant documentaries are compared with the documentaries from Montreal's sociologists. The problem is with "are containing"
Per the meaning of this choice, the documentaries from Montreal's sociologists are (right now) containing nothing remotely groundbreaking. Futhermore, it is not logical that documentaries are containing something. so this choice is incorrect
Quote:
Here the word documentaries is completely eliminated. As per the meaning of this sentence --> that of museum directors is compared with Montreal's sociologists.
that does not stand for anything in this sentence. so this is incorrect
Quote:
In this choice the comparsion is right, those produced by the Museum sociologists, the socially relevant documentaries. The sentence also has are not even remotely groundbreaking, which is a general statement. so this is the correct choice.
Quote:
same error as in A, Museum socially relevant documentaries are compared with Montreal's sociologists, so this can also be eliminated.
Therefore D is the answer
13 Aug 2019, 06:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
Quote:
Hi folks,
Meaning of the sentence: socially relevant documentaries (Plural) produced by Museum directors and Montreal's sociologists are being compared.
Whenever faced with such a problem, we need to make sure that the entities being compared are logically comparable- apples to apples, singular to singular, and plural to plural.
Quote:
Does the apple to pears comparison mistake. Socially relevant documentaries vs Montreal's sociologists. Incorrect
Quote:
Documentaries have already been produced. So there is no need to use present continuous tense. Incorrect.
Quote:
Pronoun ambiguity. That does not refer to anything. Meaning error. Incorrect.
Quote:
Replace those with socially relevant documentaries and read the sentence again. Two plural entities are being compared. Apples to apples. Correct.
Quote:
Does the apple to pears comparison mistake. Museum socially relevant documentaries vs Montreal's sociologists. Meaning error too. Incorrect
