Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
WinWinMBA
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Last visit: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 344
Own Kudos:
2,614
 [110]
Posts: 344
Kudos: 2,614
 [110]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
105
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [22]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [22]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,989
Own Kudos:
2,031
 [12]
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,989
Kudos: 2,031
 [12]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Dh4035
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 May 2019
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 32
Kudos: 5
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I’m going to say that B is the right answer. It’s the only one that correctly compares feudal Europe to ‘the American West’.
User avatar
09173140521
Joined: 09 May 2017
Last visit: 03 Jul 2025
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
365
 [1]
Given Kudos: 778
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
GMAT 1: 430 Q39 V12
GMAT 1: 430 Q39 V12
Posts: 175
Kudos: 365
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi guys. I KNOW c is best but :
1=could someone explain "which" is refer to which noun ? it is a little confusing.
2=how can be parallel this sentence? = developed from+ noun+where... and from which

....."(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies"...
avatar
Srijan2609
Joined: 06 Aug 2018
Last visit: 07 Oct 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93
Posts: 16
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
09173140521
hi guys. I KNOW c is best but :
1=could someone explain "which" is refer to which noun ? it is a little confusing.
2=how can be parallel this sentence? = developed from+ noun+where... and from which

....."(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies"...

Here which clearly refers to clusters and parralelism is mainatained if you look carefully from clusters ..... And from which

We can logically understand the meaning and reference of which is clear is quite clear .

I hope.this helps

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
09173140521
Joined: 09 May 2017
Last visit: 03 Jul 2025
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
365
 [1]
Given Kudos: 778
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
GMAT 1: 430 Q39 V12
GMAT 1: 430 Q39 V12
Posts: 175
Kudos: 365
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Srijan2609
09173140521
hi guys. I KNOW c is best but :
1=could someone explain "which" is refer to which noun ? it is a little confusing.
2=how can be parallel this sentence? = developed from+ noun+where... and from which

....."(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies"...

Here which clearly refers to clusters and parralelism is mainatained if you look carefully from clusters ..... And from which

We can logically understand the meaning and reference of which is clear is quite clear .

I hope.this helps

Posted from my mobile device
I see . but any answer parallelism in GMAT that I SO far examine .....I cannot see this pattern ! all of pattern I see is " from which .....and from which"
but in this case it is not that pattern !
avatar
Kanika3agg
Joined: 09 May 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 96
Kudos: 81
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies
User avatar
gmatassassin88
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 51
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WinWinMBA
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies

VeritasKarishma TheGMATCo AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz

I have doubt with the usage of 'Developed' in option B & every other choice.

'Urban areas developed from cluster houses'- I feel here developed is used as a Past participle & thus, I am unable to find verb.

Had not it must mention 'were developed' as a verb.

Another example from Merriam dictionary, which says 'developed' is a verb- Students developed taste for organic bread.- I understand here students did the action of developing taste. However, in the official question : Urban areas did not develop something but something was developed in Urban areas.

Please help in understanding where I am faltering and clear the gap. Thanks

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatassassin88
VeritasKarishma TheGMATCo AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz

I have doubt with the usage of 'Developed' in option B & every other choice.

'Urban areas developed from cluster houses'- I feel here developed is used as a Past participle & thus, I am unable to find verb.

Had not it must mention 'were developed' as a verb.

Another example from Merriam dictionary, which says 'developed' is a verb- Students developed taste for organic bread.- I understand here students did the action of developing taste. However, in the official question : Urban areas did not develop something but something was developed in Urban areas.

Please help in understanding where I am faltering and clear the gap. Thanks
Hi gmatassassin88,

Develop can be used in multiple ways. For example, it can be used in both these ways:
1. "to cause (something) to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In something like X will develop Y, we will see an X that performs the action of developing Y.

2. "to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In this case, there will be no "X". Instead, we can directly introduce the thing that grew or became bigger/more advanced. The example in the dictionary entry I linked to is a good example of this ("a blossom develops from a bud").
User avatar
gmatassassin88
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 51
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
gmatassassin88
VeritasKarishma TheGMATCo AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz

I have doubt with the usage of 'Developed' in option B & every other choice.

'Urban areas developed from cluster houses'- I feel here developed is used as a Past participle & thus, I am unable to find verb.

Had not it must mention 'were developed' as a verb.

Another example from Merriam dictionary, which says 'developed' is a verb- Students developed taste for organic bread.- I understand here students did the action of developing taste. However, in the official question : Urban areas did not develop something but something was developed in Urban areas.

Please help in understanding where I am faltering and clear the gap. Thanks
Hi gmatassassin88,

Develop can be used in multiple ways. For example, it can be used in both these ways:
1. "to cause (something) to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In something like X will develop Y, we will see an X that performs the action of developing Y.

2. "to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In this case, there will be no "X". Instead, we can directly introduce the thing that grew or became bigger/more advanced. The example in the dictionary entry I linked to is a good example of this ("a blossom develops from a bud").

AjiteshArun

I agree in both the options you mentioned - 1) will develop & 2) Blossoms develop from bud - 'Develop' is a verb.

However my concern is about'Develop-ed'.For example

1) Blossoms are developed from bud- 'are developed' is a verb.

2) Blossoms developed from bud/ Blossoms developed from bud seems healthy.- in this 'Developed' is a past participle/verb-ed modifier as in 'Urban areas developed from...'

Please help with your reasoning

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
427
 [2]
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatassassin88
AjiteshArun
gmatassassin88
VeritasKarishma TheGMATCo AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz

I have doubt with the usage of 'Developed' in option B & every other choice.

'Urban areas developed from cluster houses'- I feel here developed is used as a Past participle & thus, I am unable to find verb.

Had not it must mention 'were developed' as a verb.

Another example from Merriam dictionary, which says 'developed' is a verb- Students developed taste for organic bread.- I understand here students did the action of developing taste. However, in the official question : Urban areas did not develop something but something was developed in Urban areas.

Please help in understanding where I am faltering and clear the gap. Thanks
Hi gmatassassin88,

Develop can be used in multiple ways. For example, it can be used in both these ways:
1. "to cause (something) to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In something like X will develop Y, we will see an X that performs the action of developing Y.

2. "to grow or become bigger or more advanced"
In this case, there will be no "X". Instead, we can directly introduce the thing that grew or became bigger/more advanced. The example in the dictionary entry I linked to is a good example of this ("a blossom develops from a bud").

AjiteshArun

I agree in both the options you mentioned - 1) will develop & 2) Blossoms develop from bud - 'Develop' is a verb.

However my concern is about'Develop-ed'.For example

1) Blossoms are developed from bud- 'are developed' is a verb.

2) Blossoms developed from bud/ Blossoms developed from bud seems healthy.- in this 'Developed' is a past participle/verb-ed modifier as in 'Urban areas developed from...'

Please help with your reasoning

Posted from my mobile device


gmatassassin88
WinWinMBA
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies

VeritasKarishma TheGMATCo AjiteshArun AnthonyRitz

I have doubt with the usage of 'Developed' in option B & every other choice.

'Urban areas developed from cluster houses'- I feel here developed is used as a Past participle & thus, I am unable to find verb.

Had not it must mention 'were developed' as a verb.

Another example from Merriam dictionary, which says 'developed' is a verb- Students developed taste for organic bread.- I understand here students did the action of developing taste. However, in the official question : Urban areas did not develop something but something was developed in Urban areas.

Please help in understanding where I am faltering and clear the gap. Thanks

Posted from my mobile device

The point here is that "developed" as a verb can mean either "grew" or "caused to grow" -- not to mention "started to exist, experience, or possess."

The word absolutely can and does function as a verb in the sentence "urban areas developed from cluster houses." Replace with the verb "grew" and it makes perfect sense.

The word absolutely could have functioned as a passive participle in the sense of "grown" if the sentence had followed with another verb, for example in the case "urban areas developed from cluster houses are especially resilient." Replace with the participle "grown" and it makes perfect sense.

"Blossoms developed from buds": Subject "blossoms," simple past active voice verb "developed," direct object prepositional phrase "from buds."
"Blossoms developed from buds seem healthy": Subject "blossoms," passive participle phrase modifier "developed from buds," verb "seem," direct object adjective "healthy."

I hope this helps!
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatassassin88
AjiteshArun

I agree in both the options you mentioned - 1) will develop & 2) Blossoms develop from bud - 'Develop' is a verb.

However my concern is about'Develop-ed'.For example

1) Blossoms are developed from bud- 'are developed' is a verb.

2) Blossoms developed from bud/ Blossoms developed from bud seems healthy.- in this 'Developed' is a past participle/verb-ed modifier as in 'Urban areas developed from...'

Please help with your reasoning
The -ed form may or may not be a verb, but that doesn't mean that developed cannot be used as a verb (it could just be the past tense of develop).

1. Blossoms developed from a bud. ← This complete sentence uses the past tense of develop. Developed is a verb.
2. Blossoms developed from a bud... ← Let's assume that this is not a complete sentence, and that developed is a past participle modifying Blossoms.

Both are valid interpretations, but (2) is somewhat unlikely, as it means that we think that the author wants to discuss a particular type of "blossoms" (those that developed from a bud) and not "blossoms" in general. This potential for confusion does not, however, mean that the author is not permitted to go with (1). Developed is valid as the past tense of develop, and the fact that the past participle of develop takes the same form as the past tense of develop cannot change that. In fact, if we take a different position on this, we will struggle with every single -ed we come across ("the children played in the park").

Now, I think that the difference between played and developed is that the second meaning of develop in the definition I linked to is not as common as played, which is a very common word. However, it is still a perfectly acceptable way to use develop, and (meaning issues aside), blossoms developed from a bud can be treated as a complete sentence.

In this particular question, urban areas developed from clusters of houses just means that clusters of houses eventually "grew into" a ~more advanced version/state (urban areas), probably as the result of decisions taken by a large number of people. This sentence doesn't care about those people though. It's focused solely on urban areas.
User avatar
gmatassassin88
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 51
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
gmatassassin88
AjiteshArun

I agree in both the options you mentioned - 1) will develop & 2) Blossoms develop from bud - 'Develop' is a verb.

However my concern is about'Develop-ed'.For example

1) Blossoms are developed from bud- 'are developed' is a verb.

2) Blossoms developed from bud/ Blossoms developed from bud seems healthy.- in this 'Developed' is a past participle/verb-ed modifier as in 'Urban areas developed from...'

Please help with your reasoning
The -ed form may or may not be a verb, but that doesn't mean that developed cannot be used as a verb (it could just be the past tense of develop).

1. Blossoms developed from a bud. ← This complete sentence uses the past tense of develop. Developed is a verb.
2. Blossoms developed from a bud... ← Let's assume that this is not a complete sentence, and that developed is a past participle modifying Blossoms.

Both are valid interpretations, but (2) is somewhat unlikely, as it means that we think that the author wants to discuss a particular type of "blossoms" (those that developed from a bud) and not "blossoms" in general. This potential for confusion does not, however, mean that the author is not permitted to go with (1). Developed is valid as the past tense of develop, and the fact that the past participle of develop takes the same form as the past tense of develop cannot change that. In fact, if we take a different position on this, we will struggle with every single -ed we come across ("the children played in the park").

Now, I think that the difference between played and developed is that the second meaning of develop in the definition I linked to is not as common as played, which is a very common word. However, it is still a perfectly acceptable way to use develop, and (meaning issues aside), blossoms developed from a bud can be treated as a complete sentence.


In this particular question, urban areas developed from clusters of houses just means that clusters of houses eventually "grew into" a ~more advanced version/state (urban areas), probably as the result of decisions taken by a large number of people. This sentence doesn't care about those people though. It's focused solely on urban areas.

AjiteshArun

Thanks Sir,

Your continuous effort to help us improve is VITAL in my Gmat prep journey.
User avatar
gmatassassin88
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Last visit: 03 Aug 2022
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 51
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
gmatassassin88
AjiteshArun

I agree in both the options you mentioned - 1) will develop & 2) Blossoms develop from bud - 'Develop' is a verb.

However my concern is about'Develop-ed'.For example

1) Blossoms are developed from bud- 'are developed' is a verb.

2) Blossoms developed from bud/ Blossoms developed from bud seems healthy.- in this 'Developed' is a past participle/verb-ed modifier as in 'Urban areas developed from...'

Please help with your reasoning
The -ed form may or may not be a verb, but that doesn't mean that developed cannot be used as a verb (it could just be the past tense of develop).

1. Blossoms developed from a bud. ← This complete sentence uses the past tense of develop. Developed is a verb.
2. Blossoms developed from a bud... ← Let's assume that this is not a complete sentence, and that developed is a past participle modifying Blossoms.

Both are valid interpretations, but (2) is somewhat unlikely, as it means that we think that the author wants to discuss a particular type of "blossoms" (those that developed from a bud) and not "blossoms" in general. This potential for confusion does not, however, mean that the author is not permitted to go with (1). Developed is valid as the past tense of develop, and the fact that the past participle of develop takes the same form as the past tense of develop cannot change that. In fact, if we take a different position on this, we will struggle with every single -ed we come across ("the children played in the park").

Now, I think that the difference between played and developed is that the second meaning of develop in the definition I linked to is not as common as played, which is a very common word. However, it is still a perfectly acceptable way to use develop, and (meaning issues aside), blossoms developed from a bud can be treated as a complete sentence.

In this particular question, urban areas developed from clusters of houses just means that clusters of houses eventually "grew into" a ~more advanced version/state (urban areas), probably as the result of decisions taken by a large number of people. This sentence doesn't care about those people though. It's focused solely on urban areas.

Hi AnthonyRitz

THANKS FOR MAKING IT ABSOLUTE CLEAR.

so- 1) Blossoms developed from buds- here 'developed' is past tense verb in active voice
2) Blossoms were developed from buds- here 'were developed' is a past tense verb in passive voice

i hope this is correct. This area led to all the confusion
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatassassin88
Hi AnthonyRitz

THANKS FOR MAKING IT ABSOLUTE CLEAR.

so- 1) Blossoms developed from buds- here 'developed' is past tense verb in active voice
2) Blossoms were developed from buds- here 'were developed' is a past tense verb in passive voice

i hope this is correct. This area led to all the confusion
Yes, that is absolutely correct. :)

Developed as it is used here is past tense, active. Were developed is past tense, passive.
avatar
jayarora
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
237
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Products:
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
Posts: 163
Kudos: 237
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WinWinMBA
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies



In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.

Urban areas developed: IC
Homesteading policies : Noun

IC is not logically parallel to a noun. We need clause to clause or noun-to-noun comparison

B. In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies
In X (IC1), but in Y (IC2) parallel

C. Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West’s homesteading policies
Noun vs Clause comparison
Feudal Europe compared to policies

D. Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West
Same as C

E. Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies

Connector AND missing – where peasants lived AND from which they commuted
Same error as A
avatar
TarunKumar1234
Joined: 14 Jul 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 1,107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 351
Location: India
Posts: 1,107
Kudos: 1,348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.

(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that -> we are comparing " feudal Europe" to "homesteading policies". It is incorrect.

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies -> Now comparison is better, "feudal Europe" to "the American West ". Further, "where peasants lived and from which they commuted " are parallel too. Let's keep it.

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies -> Same as A. Incorrect.

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West -> Same as A. Incorrect.

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies -> Now, we are comparing, "Urban areas" to "the American West". It is not the intended meaning. Incorrect.

So, I think B. :)
avatar
kunalc20
Joined: 17 May 2016
Last visit: 10 Apr 2022
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WinWinMBA
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies

Hi AnishPassi Sir, I have a doubt in Option b: We have 2 dependent clauses separated by 'and' 1) where peasants lived and 2)from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside ...so here 1st clause starts with where and 2nd starts with which or from which, so how this usage is correct ? can you pls explain... ( the Below statement is from Manhattan SC guide - 4. Clauses
Only clauses starting with the same word should be made parallel. In general, clauses should not be
made parallel to anything besides another clause ) So is this an exception ?
User avatar
AnishPassi
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
661
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Status:GMAT Coach
Affiliations: The GMAT Co.
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Posts: 112
Kudos: 661
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kunalc20
WinWinMBA
In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that required residency on the land itself in order to obtain eventual ownership.


(A) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, unlike homesteading policies in the American West that

(B) In feudal Europe, urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside, but in the American West homesteading policies

(C) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the American West's homesteading policies

(D) Unlike feudal Europe where urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived and commuted to farmlands in the countryside, the homesteading policies of the American West

(E) Urban areas developed from clusters of houses where peasants lived from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside in feudal Europe, unlike the American West where homesteading policies

Hi AnishPassi Sir, I have a doubt in Option b: We have 2 dependent clauses separated by 'and' 1) where peasants lived and 2)from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside ...so here 1st clause starts with where and 2nd starts with which or from which, so how this usage is correct ? can you pls explain... ( the Below statement is from Manhattan SC guide - 4. Clauses
Only clauses starting with the same word should be made parallel. In general, clauses should not be
made parallel to anything besides another clause ) So is this an exception ?

Hi Kunal,

I do not agree with the statement that “ Only clauses starting with the same word should be made parallel”.

e.g.: John is running, and Bob is sleeping.

This sentence looks fine to me. The two clauses are not starting with the same word.

Here's another one:
The person WHO is running and WHOSE shoelaces are untied will probably fall.

In Option B, the two modifiers:
1. where peasants lived
2. from which they commuted to farmlands in the countryside

both are acting as noun modifiers for the same noun, so I do not see any problem with that.

Not sure whether that Manhattan statement is a part of a larger context, or maybe it has been edited in a later edition, but I think it is safe to discard that rule.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts