It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 07:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 350 [1], given: 0

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2006, 21:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (01:01) correct 24% (00:52) wrong based on 640 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

(A) a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

(B) a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

(C) corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

D) corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

(E) the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 23 Nov 2017, 19:23, edited 2 times in total.
Added the OA

Kudos [?]: 350 [1], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [1], given: 0

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2006, 21:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
KC wrote:
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted


I think it should be A

and if the corporation benefited as a result at the end of the sentence says that we need to corporation but not corporations

Kudos [?]: 38 [1], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2006, 01:04
2
This post received
KUDOS
B - not parallel
C, D - pronoun problems
E - muddled and akward.

A stands.

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [1], given: 0

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2006, 01:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
one more A.

It should be "corporation", not "corporations" as the latter part of the sentence talks about corporation.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida, Argentina, UK
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2006, 16:44
A sounds better than E. The rest are wrong for multiple reasons.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2006, 08:14
nischalb wrote:
Another one for A, what is the OA?


corporation (singular)...employee (singular)...

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2010, 12:21
OA is A.
However, the "if the employee acted" construction sounds very bad for me.
Could anybody clarify?
thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1469

Kudos [?]: 804 [0], given: 6

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2010, 12:05
but all other options are incorrect. Hence A.

Kudos [?]: 804 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 18

Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2011, 17:13
Hey guys,

I need further explanation on why E is not good, it sounds ok to me. One more thing, its easy for those who pick the right answer (whether you know it or by chance) then go on to say the other answers are awkard or muddle etc. By discussing your reasoning you will learn a lot more.

Cheers.

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 18

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2011, 16:41
brufarber wrote:
A sounds better than E. The rest are wrong for multiple reasons.


why do you say that A is better than E?
thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

23 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 123 [23], given: 62

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2013, 01:59
23
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted correct - parallelism is maintained "if the employee acted .... and if the corporation benefited"
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting incorrect tense - present continuous is not required...needs a simple present tense
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts its(singular) cannot refer to corporations, usage of "on the condition" is awkward in this sentence
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting Subject verb agreement employee (singular), commit (plural)
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted whenever and if have different meanings

Apart from other mistakes, Parallelism is also hurt in options B,C,D,E
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Kudos [?]: 123 [23], given: 62

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10160

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2014, 01:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2014
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 22

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2014, 12:13
2 things to keep in mind for this one. First, the count. Second, parallelism.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted... benefited - count of employee matches. Parallelism matches
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting- Count of employee doesn't match.
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts...benefited- No parallelism.
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting..benefited- No parallelism.
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted - Count doesnt match.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 22

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2014, 10:57
For If clauses used in past simple tenses,other clause should use would...Is this rule not voilated in this question

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 4

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10160

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2015, 03:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2015
Posts: 395

Kudos [?]: 353 [0], given: 10

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2015, 03:38
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
Correct. The subject verb agreement is in place
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
Tenses do not match with each other. Continuous tense is used for an ongoing action. Here employee has already committed a crime, hence corporation has also already committed a crime and is not in the process of doing so.
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
Subject Verb agreement. Corporations need a "those" not "its"
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
Subject Verb agreement. Employee needs "commits" not "commit"
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
Whenever changes the meaning of the sentence

Kudos [?]: 353 [0], given: 10

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2016, 14:09
TeamGMATIFY wrote:
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
Correct. The subject verb agreement is in place
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
Tenses do not match with each other. Continuous tense is used for an ongoing action. Here employee has already committed a crime, hence corporation has also already committed a crime and is not in the process of doing so.
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
Subject Verb agreement. Corporations need a "those" not "its"
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
Subject Verb agreement. Employee needs "commits" not "commit"
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
Whenever changes the meaning of the sentence


Hi,

I apologise for re- opening this thread, however, I have found that there is a grammatical error with Answer choice A wherein it states that- a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted. Isn' t 'one of the xyz' plural and 'one of the only xyz' singular? If so, shouldn't the sentence read: a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commit ( not commits) a crime, if the employee acted? It is because of this error that I went with choice C.

Please let me know if this is a legit way to go about it. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2017
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2017, 01:55
ezinis wrote:
Hey guys,

I need further explanation on why E is not good, it sounds ok to me. One more thing, its easy for those who pick the right answer (whether you know it or by chance) then go on to say the other answers are awkard or muddle etc. By discussing your reasoning you will learn a lot more.

Cheers.


Hello ezinis,

drithi9 wrote:
TeamGMATIFY wrote:
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
Correct. The subject verb agreement is in place
B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
Tenses do not match with each other. Continuous tense is used for an ongoing action. Here employee has already committed a crime, hence corporation has also already committed a crime and is not in the process of doing so.
C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
Subject Verb agreement. Corporations need a "those" not "its"
D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
Subject Verb agreement. Employee needs "commits" not "commit"
E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
Whenever changes the meaning of the sentence


Hi,

I apologise for re- opening this thread, however, I have found that there is a grammatical error with Answer choice A wherein it states that- a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted. Isn' t 'one of the xyz' plural and 'one of the only xyz' singular? If so, shouldn't the sentence read: the can help to understand the crime law whenever one of its employees commit ( not commits) a crime, if the employee acted? It is because of this error that I went with choice C.

Please let me know if this is a legit way to go about it. Thanks!


Hello ezinis,
i agree with you.There is spme errors occur in that laws.
And can you give me deep information about the "A"law.

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Jan 2016
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 59

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Human Resources)
Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2017, 09:57
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United States today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted

Last edited by broall on 20 May 2017, 10:40, edited 1 time in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 59

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4547

Kudos [?]: 8940 [1], given: 111

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2017, 17:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Chemerical71 wrote:
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United States today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted

Dear Chemerical71,
A great question! I'm happy to respond! :-)

A. a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted
This choice is flawless, a promising candidate.

B. a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting
The present progressive "is committing" is awkward, and it mismatches the tense of "committed"--those two should have the same tense, because they are simultaneous actions. This is incorrect.

C. corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts
Mismatch between antecedent & pronoun: "corporations . . . its employees." This is incorrect.

D. corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
This is is logically flaw: how can a single employee be an employee of multiple corporations? Also, after the comma, this one uses "it" to refer to the employee! This is incorrect.

E. the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted
A logical mismatch: how many employees are committing crimes here? We have multiple criminal employees before the comma, but only a singular example after the comma. This is incorrect.

The only possible answer is (A).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8940 [1], given: 111

Re: In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t   [#permalink] 22 Feb 2017, 17:45

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in t

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.