GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 22 Jan 2020, 01:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In preparation for a large-scale tree-planting project,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2017
Posts: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
WE: Law (Law)
Re: In preparation for a large-scale tree-planting project,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2019, 22:19
In my opinion, the answer to this question hinges on how fast you identify that it is "one species" that the town planners seem intent on planting.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3104
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: In preparation for a large-scale tree-planting project,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2019, 14:55
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
C. A number of trees from one of the species widespread in Thomasville 20 years ago reached the end of their natural life span in the intervening period.

The goal of the "proposal" is to "assure downtown Thomasville of an abundant tree population 20 years from now." This answer choice tells us that a number of one particular species of tree died off naturally within the past twenty years. Is this because that kind of tree generally lives less than twenty years? Or because the trees were all planted at the same time more than twenty years ago? The first option would strengthen the proposal, while the second would call the data into question. We are not given enough information to determine the reason behind this statement, and therefore its effect on the strength of the proposal.

What we do know is that other types of trees have survived for the past twenty years, and that the proposal advocates planting those trees. So, answer choice (C) does not significantly undermine the proposal and we can throw it out.

Mo2men wrote:
Dear GMATNinja

Can you elaborate more on the highlighted part? I do not understand how the first strengthen and the second weaken.
Thanks

We cannot tell whether choice (C) undermines the claim that the tree planting proposal will assure an abundant tree population.

We could come up with a variety of hypothetical situations consistent with choice (C), for example:

1) Maybe the trees mentioned in (C) -- those that "reached the end of their natural life span in the intervening period" -- were all relatively young when they died. And perhaps because a bunch of those wimpy trees died in the intervening period, that species did not have the best survival record. So it is possible that, given (C), Thomasville ruled out a wimpier species in favor of a more durable one. Great!

2) But maybe the trees mentioned in (C) were actually a bunch of very old, durable trees that all just happened to reach the end of their natural life spans during the intervening period. And perhaps because a bunch of those strong/durable trees died in the intervening period, Thomasville decided not to plant that species. So it is possible that, given (C), Thomasville ruled out what may have been the most durable tree available. Bummer!

Then again, choice (C) only refers to "a number of trees." Is that a significant number? We have no idea. Maybe (C) only affects a few outliers and wouldn't affect the data analysis or the claim one way or the other.

The bottom line is that we have no reason to believe that (C) undermines the claim. As explained in my last post, (E) clearly undermines the claim. So, (E) is a much better choice than (C).
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1364
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: In preparation for a large-scale tree-planting project,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2019, 20:31
Not sure this has been mentioned but with (c) if a number of trees reached their life span in the intervening period then they would have been picked up by the census. This then still allows the proposal to go ahead as the data will be accurate.

E is correct because the plan is to promote 1 species, but survivability DECREASES if one species is planted in abundance.
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Re: In preparation for a large-scale tree-planting project,   [#permalink] 05 Aug 2019, 20:31

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by