Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:03 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Assumption|                           
User avatar
Nihit
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Last visit: 16 Sep 2017
Posts: 258
Own Kudos:
2,281
 [106]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 258
Kudos: 2,281
 [106]
36
Kudos
Add Kudos
68
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I'm finding it hard to process the premise of this argument.

'since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product' - This premise says that as the furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers should try crafting their work in a more useful/practical manner. As they are currently not in that state, cabinetmaking is not an art.

The answer says: 'An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object's practical utility.' - How? Isn't this should be reversed? If the maker is paying attention to practical utility/usefulness, it should be an art object, right?
Shouldn't it be 'an object is not an art object unless the maker pays attention to practical utility/useful?'
avatar
Abhisharma1808
Joined: 17 Nov 2021
Last visit: 10 Feb 2022
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Location: India
GMAT 1: 390 Q33 V8
GMAT 1: 390 Q33 V8
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ASSUMPTION- There is no other way to interpret the fact . the author interpretation of the fact that there is no way that cabinetmaking is an art to considered ,that way we have to stick to that assumption only
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,331
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,331
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nihit
In recent years many cabinetmakers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since furniture must be useful, cabinetmakers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, cabinetmaking is not art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?


A. Some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.

B. Some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.

C. Cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.

D. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects practical utility.

E. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.


Conclusion: Cabinetmaking is not an art because cabinetmakers must pay close attention to the practical utility of their products.
Now let's use the negation technique. This means we'll negate each answer choice, and the correct answer will be the one that, when negated, destroys the conclusion.

A. It is not the case that some furniture is made to be placed in museums, where it will not be used by anyone.
This negated answer does not destroy the conclusion. So it is not the correct answer.

B. It is not the case that some cabinetmakers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the products they produce.
This negated answer does not destroy the conclusion. So it is not the correct answer.

C. It is not the case that cabinetmakers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than they currently are.
This negated answer does not destroy the conclusion. So it is not the correct answer.

D. It is not the case that an object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the object's practical utility.
In other words, an object CAN BE an art object if the maker pays attention to the object's practical utility.
As you can see, this negated answer choice destroys the conclusion (Cabinetmaking is not an art because cabinetmakers must pay close attention to the practical utility of their products.)

E. It is not the case that artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products.
This negated answer does not destroy the conclusion. So it is not the correct answer.


So, D must be the correct answer
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts