shivamsethi387
Can someone explain question 1 and 2 ?
Explanation
1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the passage?
Explanation
The main conclusion is hinted at in Paragraph 1 and, as we’ve seen, is given full expression in Paragraph 4. There’s a big difference between a Native American “autobiography” and the traditional form as created by Europeans, and that difference has to do with what goes into the notion of one’s self and life, and how one expresses it. (D) sums that up neatly.
(A) Where’s autobiography? (A) is probably true of scholars, but doesn’t begin to describe the conclusion of this passage because it leaves out the Topic.
(B) Where (A) was too broad, (B) is too narrow, restricting the passage simply to different expressive media, an issue that really only emerges in lines 26-34 and in some of the Paragraph 3 examples. The passage has a broader interest than (B) indicates.
(C) might sound good at first glance (wrong answers often sound good at first glance; that’s what they’re there for!) but is actually not necessarily true. The passage has to do with how Native American society influences the autobiography, whereas (C) speaks of “the depiction of an individual’s relation to society,” which is a very different thing. For all we know, both Native American and European life stories might take the same approach in showing how an individual lives within the greater community. (And the odds of that happening would seem to be better if there were “non-Native American” input into the former type, as (C) specifies.)
(E)’s characterization of Native American autobiographies as more “fragmented” seems a gross and inaccurate distortion of line 24’s passing reference to a “seeming” difference between two autobiographical modes. Beyond that, this business about how a Native American autobiography is “less easily recognizable” is sheer contrivance.
Answer: D
2. Which one of the following phrases best conveys the author’s attitude toward the earlier scholarship on Native American autobiographies that is mentioned in the passage?
Explanation
We know that the scholars in question, indicted in Paragraph 1, “have overlooked” elements of how Native Americans communicate personal history, and “have failed to address” the different culture of the Native American peoples. And danged if the latter isn’t (A).
(B),(C) Scholars have ignored diversity and inclusiveness, so these two choices hardly sum up the author’s attitude toward those scholars.
(D),(E) Each of these choices, meanwhile, speaks to the difference between the Native American and European autobiographical mode, but neither relates directly to the scholars who are at the heart of the question. Both references are too far removed from Paragraph 1 where those scholars are discussed, for one thing.
For another, the Native American approach might seem fragmented (D) to all non-Native American readers, not just scholars, and all might find that approach “alien” (E). Neither comment, then, zeroes in on the scholars’ failures of approach the way (A) does.
Answer: A
Explanation Credit: Kaplan LSAT