4. The passage indicates which one of the following about the Latina autobiographies that the author discusses?(A)
Each contains some material that would ordinarily be regarded as belonging to a genre of literature other than autobiography. Quote:
This effort manifests itself in the generically mixed structure of these works, which combine essays, sketches, short stories, poems, and journal entries without, for the most part, giving preference to any of these modes of presentation.
Quote:
these writers have revolutionized the genre of autobiography, redrawing the boundaries of this literary form to make it more amenable to the expression of their own experiences.
Writers of Latina autobiographies revolutionized the genre of autobiography by mixing various genres such as essays, sketches, short stories etc. If it were not for these writers, each autobiography contains some material that would ordinarily be regarded as belonging to a genre of literature other than autobiography
(B) Each
Latina Biographies quotes from previously unpublished private journals or other private documents.
Out of scope.(C) Each
Latina Biographies contains analysis of the ways in which its content was influenced by its author’s cultural background.
The author 's style of writing is influenced by his/her cultural background but the writing's itself donot contain analysis of the ways in which its content was influenced by its author’s cultural background.(D) Each contains writings that were produced by more than one author.
The paragraph talks about a specific autobiography- Quote:
Getting Home Alive, which departs even further from the conventions typical of autobiography by bringing together the voices of two people, a mother and her daughter.
. Whereas, the option gives a general statement that all latina autobiographies were produced by more than one author, which is not true.(E) Each includes explanations of the methodologies that its author, or authors, used in writing the autobiography.
Out of scope5. Based on the passage, the author’s attitude regarding Getting Home Alive, by Aurora Levins Morales and Rosario Morales, can be most accurately described asQuote:
Getting Home Alive departs even further from the conventions typical of autobiography by bringing together the voices of two people, a mother and her daughter, each of whom authors a portion of the text. The narratives and poems of each author are not assigned to separate sections of the text, but rather are woven together, with a piece by one sometimes commenting on a piece by the other. While this ordering may seem fragmentary and confusing, it is in fact a fully intentional and carefully designed experiment with literary structure.
(A) disappointment in scholars’ failure to recognize it as an appropriate sequel to its authors’ purely fictional and poetic works.
Certainly not a negative tone.(B) expectation that readers in general might not readily recognize that there is a clear purpose for its unconventional organization.
The correct answer choice is very subtle but we can infer this from Quote:
While this ordering may seem fragmentary and confusing, it is in fact a fully intentional and carefully designed experiment
(C) surprise that academic commentators have treated it as having significance as a historical document.
Out of scope.(D) confidence that it will be widely recognized by scholars as a work of both history and literary criticism.
Out of scope.(E) insistence that it should be credited with having helped to broaden critics’ understanding of what counts as autobiography.
Out of scope.[b]7. Which one of the following would, if true, most undermine the author’s claim in lines 51–56 about the effect that the Latina autobiographies discussed had on the genre of autobiography?
Quote:
Rather than forcing their personal histories to (line 51) conform to existing generic parameters, these writers have revolutionized the genre of autobiography, redrawing the boundaries of this literary form to make it more amenable to the expression of their own experiences.
the effect/Conclusion: Latina writers revolutionized the genre of autobiography, redrawing the boundaries.
Now what statement would undermine this conclusion?
What if this new style of writing was introduced by some other writers other than latina writers. That would undermine the conclusion.
(A) Few autobiographical works published after 1985 have been recognized for their effective use of chronologically linear prose as a means of portraying the complexities of membership in multiple cultures.
Irrelevant for the conclusion. Does not impact.(B) Few critically acclaimed books written by Latina authors have been autobiographical collections consisting partly or wholly of essays, poems, short stories, sketches, and journal entries.
Does not impact the conclusion.(C) Many autobiographies have been written by authors in the United States since 1985, and some of these present a unified, chronologically linear prose narrative in a single language.
Does not impact the conclusion.(D) Several nineteenth-century autobiographies that are generally unknown among contemporary critics of twentieth-century autobiography are characterized by generically mixed structure and multiple authorship.
Exactly what we thought of.(E) Several multigeneric, non autobiographical collections consisting at least partly of poetry, short stories, or essays by Latina authors have been published since 1985, and many of these have been critically acclaimed for their innovative structures.
Does not impact the conclusion.