Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 16:58 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 16:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,852
Own Kudos:
46,467
 [17]
Given Kudos: 6,083
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,852
Kudos: 46,467
 [17]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
gaurav0806
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2019
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 2
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tam1na
Joined: 20 Mar 2017
Last visit: 06 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Nikhil_as
Joined: 24 May 2017
Last visit: 12 Sep 2018
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 581
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
Posts: 6
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I want to understand the logic of how should i eliminate each option in this question and arrive at the right answer.
avatar
lori
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi everyone..

Went for D...but on careful observation of A...it can be understood why A is correct.

A actually goes an extra step .
The basic is to compare the theoritical performance with actual...Then comes the reason
Option A notes that Habbendorf rotary engine at "maximum performance levels" if compared to "a great racing engine"(in which all the criteria required to consider a racing engine to be "great" has been taken care of) can clearly indicate how good Habbendorf rotary engine is.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,066
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,066
Kudos: 2,130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SajjadAhmad
Source: McGraw Hill GMAT

In theory, the Habbendorf rotary engine could be a great racing engine, but in practice, it is not. The reason is that the available fuels do not have sufficient octane to obtain maximum performance from the engine.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explanation given above for why the Habbendorf rotary engine is not a great racing engine?

A. If the Habbendorf rotary engine were to operate at maximum performance levels, how would its performance compare to that of an engine recognized as a great racing engine?
B. At what level of octane in its fuel does the Habbendorf rotary engine achieve maximum performance?
C. What levels of speed, acceleration, and efficiency must an engine display in order to be considered a “great racing engine”?
D. Could a Habbendorf rotary engine be modified so that it is able to achieve maximum performance with the fuels currently available?
E. If a car equipped with a Habbendorf rotary engine were to race against a comparable car equipped with a great racing engine, by how much would the performance of the great racing engine surpass that of the Habbendorf rotary engine?

GMATNinja abhimahna
I don't agree with tha OA. Could you share your thoughts?
We can't take an imaginary situation to be useful in evaluation in this case. Especially when the problem for not achieving the maximum output is fuel.

Awaiting your reply.

Regards

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
pkm9995
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
126
 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
WE:Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Posts: 294
Kudos: 126
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatexam439 This is what i understand from the question.

The argument runs on two grounds, viz one on the theoretical and other on the practical side.It is already mentioned in the argument that the engine is practically not so great since it has got issue with the octane number of the fuel.So there nothing much to be discussed about the practical aspects {because we already know why practically it is not a great engine} and now we are left with only one question .........."whether theoretically it is a great engine or not?". For that we need to assume our engine working under the ideal condition, that is the engine working on the fuel with ideal octane number and then compare the engine's performance with other great engine.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,066
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,066
Kudos: 2,130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pkm9995109794
gmatexam439 This is what i understand from the question.

The argument runs on two grounds, viz one on the theoretical and other on the practical side.It is already mentioned in the argument that the engine is practically not so great since it has got issue with the octane number of the fuel.So there nothing much to be discussed about the practical aspects {because we already know why practically it is not a great engine} and now we are left with only one question .........."whether theoretically it is a great engine or not?". For that we need to assume our engine working under the ideal condition, that is the engine working on the fuel with ideal octane number and then compare the engine's performance with other great engine.

Hi pkm9995109794,

This is somehow making sense to me. Based on your explanation "A" does fit the bill correctly.

Thank you for the post.

Regards
User avatar
rever08
Joined: 21 Jul 2017
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 4
WE:Project Management (Education)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The fuels do not get maximum performance from the engine, thus the engine is not great.


Using POE:

E. Incorrect. It really has nothing to do with the reasoning and knowing how much it might lose by also gives no help. Two engines could be great, but one still has to perform better.

D. Incorrect. How to make the engine better does not matter in how it performs now.

C. Incorrect. Again this really does not address the issue. It might give us a baseline for some (not necessarily all) performance indicators, but the argument here is that the fuel does not get max performance. We also have no idea what performance the engine currently gets.

B. Incorrect. This lets us know what fuel is needed but doesn't tackle the question of what is the problem with the fuel now.

A. Correct.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,852
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,083
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,852
Kudos: 46,467
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

The explanation given in the passage relies on the assumption that if the rotary engine could obtain maximum performance, then it would be a great racing engine. Answer A directly questions that assumption. The question in E is incorrect because it focuses on whether or not the rotary engine is a great racing engine, rather than on the explanation given in the passage. The question in D goes outside the scope of the explanation given in the passage, and B and C do not directly address the given explanation.

ANSWER: A
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 04 Mar 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
In theory, the Habbendorf rotary engine could be a great racing engine, but in practice, it is not. The reason is that the available fuels do not have sufficient octane to obtain maximum performance from the engine.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most relevant to evaluating the adequacy of the explanation given above for why the Habbendorf rotary engine is not a great racing engine?

A. If the Habbendorf rotary engine were to operate at maximum performance levels, how would its performance compare to that of an engine recognized as a great racing engine?

B. At what level of octane in its fuel does the Habbendorf rotary engine achieve maximum performance?

C. What levels of speed, acceleration, and efficiency must an engine display in order to be considered a “great racing engine”?

D. Could a Habbendorf rotary engine be modified so that it is able to achieve maximum performance with the fuels currently available?

E. If a car equipped with a Habbendorf rotary engine were to race against a comparable car equipped with a great racing engine, by how much would the performance of the great racing engine surpass that of the Habbendorf rotary engine?

Source: McGraw Hill GMAT
Difficulty Level: 750

This is an excellent question.

The question asks which option is relevant to evaluating the "adequacy of the explanation"
C is incorrect because whether Habbendorf rotary engine could be a great racing engine is not our objective. Our objective is whether the explanation by author is valid or not.

A allows us to test the adequacy of the explanation by the author.

A is Correct
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 361
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 361
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The OE is not convincing to me, cuz the explanation is to why H engine is not a great racing engine (in practice), but A is saying why H engine is not a great racing engine (in theory), so I think A is irrelevant.
User avatar
SiddharthSachdeva
Joined: 04 Oct 2024
Last visit: 22 Apr 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 15
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also marked D, but now when I look at it, A MAKES SENSE

Option D tells that whether the engine can be modified and run on currently available fuel. This doesn't help us determine whether the reasoning given "lack of octave fuel" is adequate or not. Either the answer can be a Yes - but I don't know if it will give a supercar performance or not. Same goes for a No.

If it was something like that "If some special octave fuel (required by car) was recently discovered and testing can be done on car" - this would have made sense since now we can gauge whether lack of fuel is the only reason for it no being a supercar

Option A tells. that we can put some other fuel and test the car's running parameters to see if it qualifies as a supercar or not. If the car qualifies as a supercar after running it, it means that given logic of lack of fuel as the reason for car not being adequate was wrong.
gaurav0806
I think it's D which is evaluating the argument logically.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts