Is 3^n 2^k ? (1) k = n + 1 (2) n is a positive integer.

Question

Is 3^n > 2^k ?

(1) k = n + 1 
(2) n is a positive integer.

BrainLab · Answer

(1) k=n+1, k=2 and n=1 NO, k=3 and n=2 Yes, NOT SUFFICIENT
(2) n > 0, no info about k, which could be 1 or 100, NOT SUFFICIENT
(1)+(2) Still not sufficient considering the cases from (1)
Asnwer E

lpetroski · Answer

Hi! Can you elaborate on your answer?

I get 3 cases for statement 1

1. n=2 , k=3 9>8 - yes
2. n =3, k=4 27>16 - yes
3. n=-1, k=0 1/3 > 1 ? - no

So statement 2 tells us n is positive -- so why not c?

Thanks

chetan2u · Answer

hi,
another option when n is positive and answer is NO..
n=1, k=2..3>4... no
so dont miss out few values

Madhavi1990 · Answer

Hi! Can you elaborate on your answer?

I get 3 cases for statement 1

1. n=2 , k=3 9>8 - yes
2. n =3, k=4 27>16 - yes
3. n=-1, k=0 1/3 > 1 ? - no

So statement 2 tells us n is positive -- so why not c?

Thanks

hi,
another option when n is positive and answer is NO..
n=1, k=2..3>4... no
so dont miss out few values

Hi, I thought the same case too. Here is my reasoning.

St 1: k = n + 1. Clearly insufficient, cause we don't have any case (positive and negative would have different outcomes)

St 2: n is positive integer. Means more than zero and positive ; hence cannot be 0 but is greater than one.

So one plus two statement means: k = n +1 and n is positive integer.
3^n > 2^n+1 (replacing k).
We get 3 to power 1 NOT GREATER than 2 to power 2. Then if n = 2; k = n +1 => k =2. So 3 to power is always less than 2 to power n +1.

Thus it is sufficient.
Request experts to help out on why E is correct, and point out the issue

Thank you

chetan2u · Answer

Hi...
You are wrong at one point above..
When n=1, k =1+1=2.....3^1>2^2....NO
But when n=2 k=2+1=3...3^2>2^3... YES
Rather for all values of n above 2, Ans will be YES..

So ans is E as different answers possible

noobieTopro · Answer

is 3^n > 2^k?

(1)  k = n + 1

if n=1, k=2 
3^n < 2^k

if n=2, k=3 (or for all other values where n is greater than 2)
3^n > 2^k
Therefore, statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

(2) n is a positive integer.
Still above mentioned 2 cases can be considered.
Therefore, statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Statements (1) and (2) together, still no definite answer. 
 Therefore, answer is E.

MHIKER · Answer

(1) If  n=1, k=1+1=2;3^1>2^2;3^n < 2^k

If  n=2, k=2+1=3;3^2>2^3;3^n > 2^k

Insufficient.

(2) n is a positive integer; The above examples are sufficient to consider Yes/No.

Considering both:
Even considering both the options we can't answer.

if n=1, k=2

3^1, 2^2

Insufficient.

The answer is E.

CEdward · Answer

Is 3^n > 2^k

(1) k=n+1
n = 1, k = 2 ---> 3^1 < 2^2 NO
n = 2, k = 3 ---> 3^2 > 2^2 YES
Insufficient

(2) n is a positive integer.
Clearly insufficient b/c we don't know k.

Combo pack: Still insufficient...all we need to do is look at the sample numbers above.

Answer is E.

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Is 3^n > 2^k ? (1) k = n + 1 (2) n is a positive integer.

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards