Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 09:02 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 09:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,837
Own Kudos:
811,399
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,896
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,837
Kudos: 811,399
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 464
Own Kudos:
43,762
 [1]
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 464
Kudos: 43,762
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dina98
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Last visit: 07 Jun 2019
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V27
GPA: 3.2
Products:
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V27
Posts: 121
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
noTh1ng
Joined: 07 Apr 2015
Last visit: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 185
Posts: 123
Kudos: 214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got lost into prime factorization with this problem..

Of course you could just say from statement 1 that:
\(7^x > 16500/7\)
\(7^x > 2357,712\)

but: Is there a neater approach?
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
3,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
noTh1ng
I got lost into prime factorization with this problem..

Of course you could just say from statement 1 that:
\(7^x > 16500/7\)
\(7^x > 2357,712\)

but: Is there a neater approach?

The way you are doing is the most straightforward way but you can save yourself the time for calculating 16500/7 by noticing that 25*7=175.

Thus 7^x must be greater than a value less than 2500, say 2300 or 2400 (it doesn't matter what value you pick as you will get 2 answers with this statement making it not sufficient!)

For statement 2, Your method again is straightforward. Again you can save time with calculations by recognizing that 50*2500 =12500 and as 16k is > 12500 and as 48<50, a combination of these 2 facts will make 16k/48 >> 2500.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,007
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,007
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and equations ensures a solution.

Is 7^x greater than 2,500?

(1) 7^(x+1) > 16,500
(2) 7^(x+2) = 7^x + 16464

We need some preliminary knowledge to solve this problem. Remember that if the Que's scope includes the con scope, that con is sufficient. Essentially, the key is to approach the question using inclusion relation, instead of direct substitutions.

In the original condition, we have 1 variable (x) and since we need to match the number of variables and equations, we need 1 equations and we have 1 each in 1), 2). The answer is likely D.

In case of 1), 7^(x+1)>16,500, 7^x*7>16,500, 7^x>16,500/7=2,357 and since 2,500>2,357, it is not sufficient. '
In case of 2), we can actually find the value of x. the x value is either smaller or bigger than 2500, therefore the answer is always yes or no, and thus it is sufficient. Therefore the answer is B.
User avatar
itwarriorkarve
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Statistics, Technology
Posts: 7
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys, the answer should be D for this right?
We clearly have 7^x> 16500/7, which will clearly answer the question "is 7^x > 2500". Both of the statements alone are sufficient to answer the asked questions. Please highlight if I'm missing anything! :shock:
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
itwarriorkarve
Guys, the answer should be D for this right?
We clearly have 7^x> 16500/7, which will clearly answer the question "is 7^x > 2500". Both of the statements alone are sufficient to answer the asked questions. Please highlight if I'm missing anything! :shock:

You are not completely correct.

Yes, \(7^x\) > 16500/7 ----> you dont need to solve for 16500/7 but realise that 25*7=175 and thus 2500*7=17500. This means that 16500/7 will be a bit less than 2500.

With actual numbers, you see that 16500/7 = 2357.1 ---> \(7^x\) > 2357

Now consider 2 cases:

If \(7^x\) = 2400 , this will give a "no" for "is 7^x > 2500" but

If \(7^x\) = 2700 , this will give a "yes" for "is 7^x > 2500"

both these values of 2400 and 2700 are >2357. As you get 2 different answers for statement 1, this statement is NOT sufficient.
User avatar
itwarriorkarve
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Statistics, Technology
Posts: 7
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engr2012
itwarriorkarve
Guys, the answer should be D for this right?
We clearly have 7^x> 16500/7, which will clearly answer the question "is 7^x > 2500". Both of the statements alone are sufficient to answer the asked questions. Please highlight if I'm missing anything! :shock:

You are not completely correct.

Yes, \(7^x\) > 16500/7 ----> you dont need to solve for 16500/7 but realise that 25*7=175 and thus 2500*7=17500. This means that 16500/7 will be a bit less than 2500.

With actual numbers, you see that 16500/7 = 2357.1 ---> \(7^x\) > 2357

Now consider 2 cases:

If \(7^x\) = 2400 , this will give a "no" for "is 7^x > 2500" but

If \(7^x\) = 2700 , this will give a "yes" for "is 7^x > 2500"

both these values of 2400 and 2700 are >2357. As you get 2 different answers for statement 1, this statement is NOT sufficient.


Amazing!! How'd I miss that? Thank you so much for your answer!!
User avatar
anudeep133
Joined: 10 Aug 2015
Last visit: 14 Dec 2018
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 94
Kudos: 282
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution :

Statement1 : 7^x > 16500/7 ==> 7^x > 2357.
We know that 2500 = 50(50) which is closer to (49)(49).
So lets check 7^4 which is 2401 which is less 2500 but greater than 2357 and 7^5 will obviously be greater than 2500.
So, Insufficient.

Statement2 : 49(7^x) = 7^x + 16464 ==> 48(7^x) = 16464 ==> 7^x = 343.
So, NO. Sufficient

Option B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,988
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,988
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109837 posts
498 posts
212 posts