Oct 18 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn an intuitive, systematic approach that will maximize your success on Fillintheblank GMAT CR Questions. Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss!
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2015, 02:42
Question Stats:
60% (01:19) correct 40% (00:59) wrong based on 137 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is m > n? (1) n /m < 1 (2) n > 0 Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 177
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.2
WE: Accounting (Consulting)

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2015, 07:34
(1) n /m < 1It's important to remember that as we don't know if m is positive or negative, we can't multiply by it in an inequality. e.g. is you multiply, then n < m, but if n = 2, m = 2, then we get 2 < 2, which is incorrect, when you multiply by a negative the sign should be flipped, but we don't know if we should flip it if we don't have any info on the sign of denominator m. So, let's plug values: n = 1, m =2, then m>n. (1/2 = 0,5 < 1) But, if we plug n=1, m = 2, then n>m. (1/2 = 0,5 <1) Not sufficient.(2) n > 0No info on m. Not sufficient.(1) & (2) Together The second statement does not help to resolve the problem we encountered in Statement 1. Not sufficient.Answer
_________________
Stay positive! ^.^ My blog  http://www.mbafortech.com



CEO
Status: GMATINSIGHT Tutor
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2978
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2015, 07:57
Bunuel wrote: Is m > n?
(1) n /m < 1 (2) n > 0
Kudos for a correct solution. Question : Is m > n?Statement 1: n/m < 1@n=1, m could be 1 i.e. m > n @n=1, m could be 1 i.e. m < n Hence, NOT SUFFICIENTStatement 2: n > 0No information about m Hence, NOT SUFFICIENTCombining the Two statementsn > 0 and n/m < 1 @n=1, m could be 1 i.e. m < n @n=1, m could be 2 i.e. m > n Hence, NOT SUFFICIENTAnswer: option
_________________
Prosper!!!GMATinsightBhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhihttp://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.htmlACCESS FREE GMAT TESTS HERE:22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION



Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2013
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V40
GPA: 3.85
WE: Research (Telecommunications)

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2015, 18:51
Say I've decided that A, B are out, each is not sufficient. Combining, \(\frac{n}{m} < 1 means \frac{m}{n}> 1\) So, \(\frac{(mn)}{n} >0\) If it's given that n > 0 (Combining B) (mn)> 0. So, m > n So I implied Am I missing anything?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Posts: 44
Location: United States

Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 19 Jun 2015, 00:07
Bunuel wrote: Is m > n?
(1) n /m < 1 (2) n > 0
Kudos for a correct solution. 1: if m > 0, n < m. If m < 0, n > m. So insufficient. 2: Insufficient, tells nothing about m. Together: insufficient. m can still be negative or positive. For example, n = 4, m = 8, m > n. But if n = 4, m = 8, n/m < 1 and n > m. Answer is E. aardvark wrote: \(\frac{n}{m} < 1 means \frac{m}{n}> 1\)
That assumes that m and n have the same sign (since you are multiplying both sides by m/n). If they have opposite signs (so m/n < 0), you have to change the inequality.
Originally posted by bluesquare on 19 Jun 2015, 00:05.
Last edited by bluesquare on 19 Jun 2015, 00:07, edited 1 time in total.



Manager
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 177
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.2
WE: Accounting (Consulting)

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2015, 00:06
aardvark wrote: Say I've decided that A, B are out, each is not sufficient. Combining, \(\frac{n}{m} < 1 means \frac{m}{n}> 1\)So, \(\frac{(mn)}{n} >0\) If it's given that n > 0 (Combining B) (mn)> 0. So, m > n So I implied Am I missing anything? You can't take reciprocal if you don't know the sign. If m = 2 and n = 1, then \(\frac{1}{2}<1\), and \(\frac{2}{1}> 1\), but if m=2 and n = 1, then \(\frac{1}{2} < 1\), and \(\frac{2}{1} < 1\). Sign changes only if both are either negative or positive.
_________________
Stay positive! ^.^ My blog  http://www.mbafortech.com



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jun 2015, 05:55
Bunuel wrote: Is m > n?
(1) n /m < 1 (2) n > 0
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:(1) INSUFFICIENT. It is tempting to cross multiply to get n < m. However, we don't know whether m is positive, so we don't know whether to flip the sign. (2) INSUFFICIENT. This statement tells us nothing about m. (1) & (2) INSUFFICIENT. The fact that n is positive does not tell us whether m is positive. For example, it is possible than n = 2 and m = –1. It is also possible that n = 2 and m = 3. Either of these scenarios would fit Statements (1) and (2) but yield different answers to the question. The correct answer is E.
_________________



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13242

Re: Is m > n?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2018, 01:41
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________










