Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:37 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,148
Kudos: 2,854
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mrjoe1
Joined: 21 Sep 2018
Last visit: 25 Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,078
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,078
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
mk87
Hi guys
I'm a little confused as to whether we should consider the properties of a kite when dealing with quadrilaterals. For example:

Is quadrilateral ABCD a Rhombus?
(1) Line segments AC and BD are perpendicular bisectors of each other
(2) AB = BC = CD = AD

The official answer is as follows:
Statement 1 - SUFFICIENT: The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of one another. This is in fact enough information to prove that a quadrilateral is a rhombus
Statement 2 - A quadrilateral with four equal sides is by definition a rhombus

What I don't get is that the question mentions it is a quadrilateral, not a parallelogram. In this case, how can we eliminate the possibility that it could be a kite as well in Statement 1?

Statement 1 says the diagonals are perpendicular bisectors of each other which means that they intersect each other at mid points and form 90 degree angles. It is not possible that they are in the shape of an asymmetric kite. Figure 1 is not possible. Only figure 2 is possible. In figure 2, all sides will be equal.
Attachment:
Ques4.jpg

This is an interesting post. So to be clear, the distinction is this

1. The diagonals of a kite INTERSECT each other, but we don't consider them as bisectors b/c the diagonals are not split evenly
2. The diagonals of a rhombus are PERPENDICULAR BISECTORS (bisection b/c diagonals are split evenly into two)
3. The diagonals of a rectangle are NON-PERPENDICULAR bisectors (b/c the bisection does not form 90 degree angles), but in the case of a square the bisectors ARE perpendicular bisectors.

Bunuel is this accurate?
User avatar
MBAB123
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2023
Posts: 563
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 563
Kudos: 318
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
VeritasKarishma
mk87
Hi guys
I'm a little confused as to whether we should consider the properties of a kite when dealing with quadrilaterals. For example:

Is quadrilateral ABCD a Rhombus?
(1) Line segments AC and BD are perpendicular bisectors of each other
(2) AB = BC = CD = AD

The official answer is as follows:
Statement 1 - SUFFICIENT: The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular bisectors of one another. This is in fact enough information to prove that a quadrilateral is a rhombus
Statement 2 - A quadrilateral with four equal sides is by definition a rhombus

What I don't get is that the question mentions it is a quadrilateral, not a parallelogram. In this case, how can we eliminate the possibility that it could be a kite as well in Statement 1?

Statement 1 says the diagonals are perpendicular bisectors of each other which means that they intersect each other at mid points and form 90 degree angles. It is not possible that they are in the shape of an asymmetric kite. Figure 1 is not possible. Only figure 2 is possible. In figure 2, all sides will be equal.
Attachment:
Ques4.jpg

This is an interesting post. So to be clear, the distinction is this

1. The diagonals of a kite INTERSECT each other, but we don't consider them as bisectors b/c the diagonals are not split evenly
2. The diagonals of a rhombus are PERPENDICULAR BISECTORS (bisection b/c diagonals are split evenly into two)
3. The diagonals of a rectangle are NON-PERPENDICULAR bisectors (b/c the bisection does not form 90 degree angles), but in the case of a square the bisectors ARE perpendicular bisectors.

Bunuel is this accurate?

CEdward - this link is pretty awesome for quadrilaterals - https://e-gmat.com/blogs/quadrilateral-properties-formulas-rectangle-square-parallelogram-rhombus-trapezium-trapezoid/
avatar
amoghhlgr
Joined: 16 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Location: India
Schools: Said'16
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V40
GPA: 3.5
Schools: Said'16
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V40
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Thought about this again: D it is.

Well:
(1) True for square or for rhombus but every square is a rhombus, so sufficient
(2) Again true for square or for rhombus but every square is a rhombus, so sufficient

D

What about the kite? It has a perpendicular bisector, so 1 is out??
avatar
shalin23
Joined: 27 Aug 2021
Last visit: 21 Jan 2022
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am kind of confused because, in previous DS questions, the answers probably would be E for such a question.

I feel the inference is kind of vague.


According to statement 1, cant the figure be both a Square and a Rhombus?

Same for statement 2...

Can someone please clarify how to infer here thanks.
User avatar
RastogiSarthak99
Joined: 20 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Aug 2024
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 282
Location: India
Posts: 141
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the most important thing to understand here is that every square is a rhombus
User avatar
prachisaraf
Joined: 03 Jan 2023
Last visit: 31 Jul 2023
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 299
Posts: 28
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist
Is quadrilateral ABCD a rhombus?

(1) Line segments AC and BD are perpendicular bisectors of each other.

(2) AB = BC = CD = AD

Is it true that square is a kind of rhombus ? Aren't the properties different for both wrt diagonals length ? Can we assume this for all questions where it can be either a square or a rhombus ?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,078
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prachisaraf
Economist
Is quadrilateral ABCD a rhombus?

(1) Line segments AC and BD are perpendicular bisectors of each other.

(2) AB = BC = CD = AD

Is it true that square is a kind of rhombus ? Aren't the properties different for both wrt diagonals length ? Can we assume this for all questions where it can be either a square or a rhombus ?

Every square is a rhombus, but every rhombus is not a square.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts