Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Originally posted by altairahmad on 24 Aug 2020, 00:36.
Last edited by altairahmad on 24 Aug 2020, 00:56, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While going through MGMAT's SC guide I came across the following sentence,
"Frank's build, like that of his brother, is broad and muscular."
I had read on this forum in a few places that the word 'that' points to the complete noun and that we must substitute the whole noun and see if the sentence makes sense. In this case shouldn't 'that' stand in for 'Frank's build' ? In which case the sentence will not make any sense. MGMAT however calls this sentence as correct. Besides, if 'that' makes a copy of the same thing, in this case 'Frank's build', it doesn't make sense right ? What am I missing ?
Will appreciate if someone can point out the fallacy in my understanding.
Will appreciate expert reply.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
That here is modifying build. Frank's is a possessive noun and any pronoun can't refer back to possessive. So the that in the later clause, referring to build. Sentence is correct.
That here is modifying build. Frank's is a possessive noun and any pronoun can't refer back to possessive. So the that in the later clause, referring to build. Sentence is correct.
Posted from my mobile device
Show more
As per my understanding, the noun here is not just 'build', its 'Frank's build'. I believe, you can't separate 'build' and 'Frank's'.
Hello, altairahmad. I agree with what yashikaaggarwal wrote above. What seems to be causing you discomfort is the pairing of a possessive with a non-possessive, but whatever is being possessed in either case serves as the center of comparison. Consider:
1) Frank's build, like his brother's, is broad and muscular.
2) The build of Frank, like the build of his brother, is broad and muscular.
The second spinoff sounds a little antiquated, but it could pass as a legitimate comparison. Mixing and matching one part of either comparison with its logical counterpart in the other sentence presents no issues in terms of meaning.
I have seen misprints before in Manhattan Prep books, but never a flat-out wrong teaching of a concept. Trust the book and carry this knowledge with you as you continue your studies.
I had little doubt, altairahmad, but I am glad that you discovered an official question to solidify the point. Thank you for following up and letting others who may come across this thread know what you found.
That here is modifying build. Frank's is a possessive noun and any pronoun can't refer back to possessive. So the that in the later clause, referring to build. Sentence is correct.
Posted from my mobile device
Show more
I would like to add one point. Only possessive pronouns can refer back to a possessive noun. Example : His, Its etc
Regards, Arup
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.