Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 05:08 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 05:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
alphonsa
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 25 Oct 2020
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
1,043
 [13]
Given Kudos: 197
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,414
Own Kudos:
778,490
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,414
Kudos: 778,490
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrushMyQuant
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Last visit: 21 Oct 2025
Posts: 2,284
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 100
Status:Tutor - BrushMyQuant
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: XLRI (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
Posts: 2,284
Kudos: 2,552
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
skysailor
Joined: 09 Apr 2017
Last visit: 26 Mar 2020
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 24
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could someone help me understand why inequality x(x-5) < 0 gives us x>0 and not x<0?
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,124
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,124
Kudos: 1,263
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agree with the above statement.
1. can be rewritten as |x|<4.
2. x is definitely <5, but can't be negative, otherwise, it wouldn't be true 2. therefore 0<x<5
we have for each statement a definite answer.

D.
User avatar
saarthak299
Joined: 16 May 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 158
Posts: 31
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |x| < 5?

(1) x^2 < 16. Since both sides are nonnegative, then we can take the square root from: |x| < 4. Sufficient.

(2) x(x - 5) < 0. The "roots" are 0 and 5 and "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so 0 < x < 5. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

hey,
do we include negative terms also in first condition?
in X^2 the value of x can be negative also.

pls, explain.
thank you.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,414
Own Kudos:
778,490
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,414
Kudos: 778,490
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saarthak299
Bunuel
Is |x| < 5?

(1) x^2 < 16. Since both sides are nonnegative, then we can take the square root from: |x| < 4. Sufficient.

(2) x(x - 5) < 0. The "roots" are 0 and 5 and "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so 0 < x < 5. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

hey,
do we include negative terms also in first condition?
in X^2 the value of x can be negative also.

pls, explain.
thank you.

Yes, |x| < 4 means -4 < x < 4.
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,436
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,002
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,436
Kudos: 1,884
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
skysailor
Could someone help me understand why inequality x(x-5) < 0 gives us x>0 and not x<0?

x (x - 5) < 0; we have two cases ;

x < 0 & x - 5 > 0 or x > 5 ; You can try some values in this range and you will see that this inequality will not hold true.

x > 0 & x < 5 ; or 0 < x <5 ; solutions are between 0 and 5.
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 570
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 570
Kudos: 1,639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |x| < 5?

(1) x^2 < 16. Since both sides are nonnegative, then we can take the square root from: |x| < 4. Sufficient.

(2) x(x - 5) < 0. The "roots" are 0 and 5 and "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so 0 < x < 5. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hey abhimahna, how do we know the range by just looking at "x(x - 5) < 0" without having to consider the 2 scenarios (i.e. 1) x<0 & (x-5)>0 2) x>0 & (x-5)<0) as Bunuel mentioned? Is there a trick for it and can it apply to other situations as the example mentioned below? Thanks!

How about x(x-5)>0?
Case 1 (Both +): x>0, x-5>0
x>5

Case 2 (Both -): x<0,x-5<0
x<0
User avatar
pushpitkc
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Last visit: 19 Feb 2025
Posts: 2,802
Own Kudos:
6,065
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Posts: 2,802
Kudos: 6,065
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dabaobao
Bunuel
Is |x| < 5?

(1) x^2 < 16. Since both sides are nonnegative, then we can take the square root from: |x| < 4. Sufficient.

(2) x(x - 5) < 0. The "roots" are 0 and 5 and "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so 0 < x < 5. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hey abhimahna, how do we know the range by just looking at "x(x - 5) < 0" without having to consider the 2 scenarios (i.e. 1) x<0 & (x-5)>0 2) x>0 & (x-5)<0) as Bunuel mentioned? Is there a trick for it and can it apply to other situations as the example mentioned below? Thanks!

How about x(x-5)>0?
Case 1 (Both +): x>0, x-5>0
x>5

Case 2 (Both -): x<0,x-5<0
x<0


Hey dabaobao

You have made a mistake in the highlighted portion

If x>0 and x>5, then the solution will be x > 0
Similarly, if x < 0 and x < 5, the solution is x < 5.
Therefore, the solution to this inequality must be 0 < x < 5

You might want to read the following link
https://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities ... 91482.html

Hope this helps you!
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 570
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 570
Kudos: 1,639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pushpitkc
dabaobao
Bunuel
Is |x| < 5?

(1) x^2 < 16. Since both sides are nonnegative, then we can take the square root from: |x| < 4. Sufficient.

(2) x(x - 5) < 0. The "roots" are 0 and 5 and "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so 0 < x < 5. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hey abhimahna, how do we know the range by just looking at "x(x - 5) < 0" without having to consider the 2 scenarios (i.e. 1) x<0 & (x-5)>0 2) x>0 & (x-5)<0) as Bunuel mentioned? Is there a trick for it and can it apply to other situations as the example mentioned below? Thanks!

How about x(x-5)>0?
Case 1 (Both +): x>0, x-5>0
x>5

Case 2 (Both -): x<0,x-5<0
x<0


Hey dabaobao

You have made a mistake in the highlighted portion

If x>0 and x>5, then the solution will be x > 0
Similarly, if x < 0 and x < 5, the solution is x < 5.
Therefore, the solution to this inequality must be 0 < x < 5


You might want to read the following link
https://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities ... 91482.html

Hope this helps you!

pushpitkc Thanks a lot bruh for that link. Remember studying that trick in high school but couldn't recall it. That trick makes it really easy to do such questions. Btw I don't think I made a mistake above. If we are looking at x(x-5)>0, then the solution should be x>5 or x<0 (which is what I got). I believe you mixed up x(x-5)>0 with x(x-5)<0.

Irrespective of that issue, I think we should always discard the less limiting inequality.
Example 1: If x>0 and x>5, then solution is x>5 [x>0 is the less limiting inequality]
Example 2: If x<0 and x<5, then solution is x<0 [x<5 is the less limiting inequality]
Moderators:
Math Expert
105414 posts
496 posts