Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:22 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
banksy
Joined: 10 Feb 2011
Last visit: 01 Apr 2011
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
1,951
 [23]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 86
Kudos: 1,951
 [23]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,349
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,349
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,099
Own Kudos:
5,095
 [4]
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,099
Kudos: 5,095
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GDR29
Joined: 26 Oct 2013
Last visit: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 17
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

To make true the statement we have to alternatives:
x>y (both x and y positives)
x<y (both x and y negatives)

(1) x > y. If both are positive the answer will be YES but if they are negatives the answer will be NO
(2) xу is not equal to 0. This statement is irrelevant.

(1)+(2) We can not determine. Not sufficient.
User avatar
TooLong150
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 07 Feb 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 135
Kudos: 536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E

Picking smart numbers is the best approach for this problem:
(1)
N: x=6, y=-6
Y: x=6, y=5
NS

(2)
Same numbers as (1)
NS

(1)+(2)
NS
avatar
Nab77
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Last visit: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Experts,
Since both sides of the eqn are positive I assumed we can approach the problem as below:
(x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0 which leads to (x-3-y-3)(x-3-y+3)>0 and further (x-y-6)(x-y)>0 ie, we get 2 solutions : x>y or (x-y)>6.

Because I saw Option 1 has one of these solutions ie.x>y I chose (A). Is it incorrect to choose an option if it is partially satisfied? Kindly help me understand.

Thanks & Regards,
Nab
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,705
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,705
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nab77
Hello Experts,
Since both sides of the eqn are positive I assumed we can approach the problem as below:
(x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0 which leads to (x-3-y-3)(x-3-y+3)>0 and further (x-y-6)(x-y)>0 ie, we get 2 solutions : x>y or (x-y)>6.

Because I saw Option 1 has one of these solutions ie.x>y I chose (A). Is it incorrect to choose an option if it is partially satisfied? Kindly help me understand.

Thanks & Regards,
Nab

Hi Nab,
you have done two mistakes in the highlighted portion..

1) \((x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0.............. (x-3+y-3)(x-3(y-3))>0...... (x+y-6)(x-y)>0.....\) and NOT (x-y-6)(x-y)>0

2) It is NOT x>y or (x-y)>6 BUT x>y and (x+y)>6 or x<y and (x+y)<6..
so two cases-
a) BOTH (x+y-6) and (x-y) are +ive or BOTh are -ive
avatar
Nab77
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Last visit: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Nab77
Hello Experts,
Since both sides of the eqn are positive I assumed we can approach the problem as below:
(x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0 which leads to (x-3-y-3)(x-3-y+3)>0 and further (x-y-6)(x-y)>0 ie, we get 2 solutions : x>y or (x-y)>6.

Because I saw Option 1 has one of these solutions ie.x>y I chose (A). Is it incorrect to choose an option if it is partially satisfied? Kindly help me understand.

Thanks & Regards,
Nab

Hi Nab,
you have done two mistakes in the highlighted portion..

1) \((x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0.............. (x-3+y-3)(x-3(y-3))>0...... (x+y-6)(x-y)>0.....\) and NOT (x-y-6)(x-y)>0

2) It is NOT x>y or (x-y)>6 BUT x>y and (x+y)>6 or x<y and (x+y)<6..
so two cases-
a) BOTH (x+y-6) and (x-y) are +ive or BOTh are -ive


Hi Chetan,
Oops yes I'm sorry that was a typo, i did get (x+y-6)(x-y)>0.
From 2) Do you mean that it is not an OR condition but an AND condition? I didn't understand that quite well, can you please explain again. Especially the part BUT x>y and (x+y)>6 or x<y and (x+y)<6. I didn't understand how the equality signs changed.

Thanks for your reply.

Regards,
Nab
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,705
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,705
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nab77
chetan2u
Nab77
Hello Experts,
Since both sides of the eqn are positive I assumed we can approach the problem as below:
(x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0 which leads to (x-3-y-3)(x-3-y+3)>0 and further (x-y-6)(x-y)>0 ie, we get 2 solutions : x>y or (x-y)>6.

Because I saw Option 1 has one of these solutions ie.x>y I chose (A). Is it incorrect to choose an option if it is partially satisfied? Kindly help me understand.

Thanks & Regards,
Nab

Hi Nab,
you have done two mistakes in the highlighted portion..

1) \((x-3)^2 - (y-3)^2 >0.............. (x-3+y-3)(x-3(y-3))>0...... (x+y-6)(x-y)>0.....\) and NOT (x-y-6)(x-y)>0

2) It is NOT x>y or (x-y)>6 BUT x>y and (x+y)>6 or x<y and (x+y)<6..
so two cases-
a) BOTH (x+y-6) and (x-y) are +ive or BOTh are -ive


Hi Chetan,
Oops yes I'm sorry that was a typo, i did get (x+y-6)(x-y)>0.
From 2) Do you mean that it is not an OR condition but an AND condition? I didn't understand that quite well, can you please explain again. Especially the part BUT x>y and (x+y)>6 or x<y and (x+y)<6. I didn't understand how the equality signs changed.

Thanks for your reply.

Regards,
Nab


Hi,

the equation is-


\((x+y-6)(x-y)>0\)...

The Left Hand Side can be >0 under two cases..

1) when both (x+y-6) and (x-y) are greater than 0... since Positive * Positive = Positive..
so x-y>0 or x>y................and x+y-6>0 or x+y>0.........
Example x = 5, y=2.. x>y and x+y>6 ... so (5+2-6)(5-2)>0.....1*3>0...YES

2) when both (x+y-6) and (x-y) are lesser than 0... since Negative * Negative = Positive..
so x-y<0 or x<y................and x+y-6<0 or x+y<6.........
x= 2 and y =3.....x<y and x+y<6 ... so (3+2-6)(2-3)>0.....(-1)(-1)>0..........1>0......YES
avatar
Nab77
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Last visit: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Hi,

the equation is-


\((x+y-6)(x-y)>0\)...

The Left Hand Side can be >0 under two cases..

1) when both (x+y-6) and (x-y) are greater than 0... since Positive * Positive = Positive..
so x-y>0 or x>y................and x+y-6>0 or x+y>0.........
Example x = 5, y=2.. x>y and x+y>6 ... so (5+2-6)(5-2)>0.....1*3>0...YES

2) when both (x+y-6) and (x-y) are lesser than 0... since Negative * Negative = Positive..
so x-y<0 or x<y................and x+y-6<0 or x+y<6.........
x= 2 and y =3.....x<y and x+y<6 ... so (3+2-6)(2-3)>0.....(-1)(-1)>0..........1>0......YES


Yes i realize where I went wrong! :(
Thanks a tonne for the explanation.

Thanks & Regards,
Nab
User avatar
Divyadisha
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Last visit: 01 Jun 2018
Posts: 663
Own Kudos:
1,928
 [2]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 663
Kudos: 1,928
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banksy
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0.

(1) x > y.
Let's say x=4 and y=3, then |x – 3| > |y – 3|
but it x=-3 and y=-4, then the aboveineqzuality will not hold true.
Insufficient
(2) xу is not equal to 0
This statement means either x or y is not equal to 0. It can be +ve or -ve. not sufficient.

Combining both statements doesn't give a unique answer. Hence E is the answer
User avatar
shashankism
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Last visit: 23 Dec 2024
Posts: 609
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Affiliations: IIT Dhanbad
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 609
Kudos: 694
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banksy
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0.

DS: Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

Statement 1 : x>y
Lets say x =6 , y = 4 |x-3| = 3>|y-3| = 1
Lets say x = 1, y = -4 |x-3|= 2<|y-3| = 7

NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2 : xy is not equal to 0 . So, neither x nor y is not equal to 0 .
Lets say x =6 , y = 4 |x-3| = 3>|y-3| = 1
Lets say x = 1, y = -4 |x-3|= 2<|y-3| = 7
NOT SUFFICIENT

Combined : same examples
NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer E
User avatar
nagu
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Last visit: 03 Sep 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 18
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0

2. XY not equal to 0 we don't know the value of X and Y so Insufficient

2. If x =10 and Y = -100 then |Y-3| is greater if x=10 and Y= 5 then |X-3| is greater so insuffiecient

together the same example holds good, not sufficient hence Answer should be E
User avatar
MikeScarn
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 01 Jun 2025
Posts: 275
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 227
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.62
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banksy
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0.

For DS AbsValue questions I try to read the question and spend about 10 seconds to see if I can understand what it is asking before I even look at the statements.

Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|? When would this be true and when would it be not true?

Well, if they are both positive and x>y, then yes.

If they are both negative and x>y, then no.

Read statement (1) and (2), neither account for the option of a Negative Y. Example: x=1 y=-900, satisfies both statements, answer to question is no.

Yes/No= E
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,148
Kudos: 2,855
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
msurls
banksy
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0.

For DS AbsValue questions I try to read the question and spend about 10 seconds to see if I can understand what it is asking before I even look at the statements.

Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|? When would this be true and when would it be not true?

This is really the same as "Is |x|>|y|?"

Well, if they are both positive and x>y, then yes.

If x>y but Y has a greater magnitude than X, then no.

Read statement (1) and (2), neither account for the option of a Negative Y. Example: x=1 y=-900, satisfies both statements, answer to question is no.

Yes/No= E

Hello

You are correct that answer is E. However, I would like to point out the highlighted part in your analysis. (I have highlighted)

|x-3| > |y-3| is NOT the same as |x|>|y|.

Eg., if x=-1 and y=5, then |x-3| > |y-3| BUT |x| < |y|

Actually |x-3| > |y-3| means that the distance of 'x' and '3' is more than the distance of 'y' and '3'.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
19,392
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,392
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
banksy
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
(2) xу is not equal to 0.


Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. For DS problems, the VA (Variable Approach) method is the quickest and easiest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember that equal numbers of variables and independent equations ensure a solution.

Since we have 2 variables (x and y) and 0 equations, C is most likely to be the answer. So, we should consider conditions 1) & 2) together first. After comparing the number of variables and the number of equations, we can save time by considering conditions 1) & 2) together first.

Conditions 1) & 2):
x = 4, y = 3: Yes
x = 3, y = 2: No

Since we have two answer, "yes" and "no", both conditions together are not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is E.

Normally, in problems which require 2 equations, such as those in which the original conditions include 2 variables, or 3 variables and 1 equation, or 4 variables and 2 equations, each of conditions 1) and 2) provide an additional equation. In these problems, the two key possibilities are that C is the answer (with probability 70%), and E is the answer (with probability 25%). Thus, there is only a 5% chance that A, B or D is the answer. This occurs in common mistake types 3 and 4. Since C (both conditions together are sufficient) is the most likely answer, we save time by first checking whether conditions 1) and 2) are sufficient, when taken together. Obviously, there may be cases in which the answer is A, B, D or E, but if conditions 1) and 2) are NOT sufficient when taken together, the answer must be E.
avatar
cruiseav
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Last visit: 19 May 2022
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 35
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

x-3 > -(y-3)
x-3 > -y+3
x+y > 6
or
x-3 > y-3
x-y > 0
x>y

so; if x>y and x+y>6; we can be sure that |x-3| > |y-3|

(1) x > y.
But we don't know whether x+y>6. Not sufficient.


x=2
y=1
1<2

x=5
y=2
2>1


(2) xу is not equal to 0.
We don't know whether x>y or x+y>6. Not sufficient.
Same sample set from 1 can be used;

Together;
We don't know whether x+y>6. Not sufficient.

Same sample set from 1 can be used.

Ans: "E"

I got the solution explained above. My doubt is shouldn't be we checking the other 2 scenarios also which are
-(x-3)>(y-3) and
-(x-3) > -(y-3)

my thinking is as there are two modulus involved we should check all the 4 possible scenario
x-3 > y-3
x-3 > -(y-3)
-(x-3)>(y-3)
-(x-3) > -(y-3)
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 923
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 167
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain to me why |x-3| > |y-3| is only true if x>y AND 6>x+y? Why is it not sufficient to just have one of the conditions met?
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |x – 3| > |y – 3|?

(1) x > y.
x = -2, y = 3 NO
x = 5, y = 4 YES
Insufficient
(2) xу is not equal to 0.
This just tells us neither of x and y are zero.
Insufficient.

C: We don't know anything new by combining

Answer is E.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts