GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Aug 2019, 14:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 713
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2019, 12:50
2
4
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

30% (02:31) correct 70% (02:12) wrong based on 254 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

It is a given that to be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others. Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach will enable one to inspire that curiosity. For such a perpetual expansion of one's mind makes it impossible to be fully comprehended, making one a constant mystery to others.

Which of the following expresses the main conclusion?

(A) To be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

(B) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

(C) If one's mind becomes impossible to fully comprehend, one will always be a mystery to others

(D) To inspire the perpetual curiosity of others, one must constantly broaden one's abilities and extend one's intellectual reach

(E) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will always have curiosity

_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mod-nightblade-s-quick-guide-to-proficiency-cr-295316.html

Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-club-moderators-directory-253455.html

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Need a CR tutor? PM me!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7756
Re: It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2019, 23:38
4
2
It is a given that to be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others. Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach will enable one to inspire that curiosity. For such a perpetual expansion of one's mind makes it impossible to be fully comprehended, making one a constant mystery to others.

Which of the following expresses the main conclusion?

(A) To be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

(B) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

(C) If one's mind becomes impossible to fully comprehend, one will always be a mystery to others

(D) To inspire the perpetual curiosity of others, one must constantly broaden one's abilities and extend one's intellectual reach

(E) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will always have curiosity

The question is NOT ' What is the main conclusion?', BUT 'What expresses the main conclusion?'.
So let us look for the main conclusion in the PARA.

It is a given that to be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others. Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach will enable one to inspire that curiosity. For such a perpetual expansion of one's mind makes it impossible to be fully comprehended, making one a constant mystery to others.
It is a given that to be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others. -- This sounds like a Premise
Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach will enable one to inspire that curiosity. -- Yes, this is a conclusion.
For such a perpetual expansion of one's mind makes it impossible to be fully comprehended, making one a constant mystery to others.---Use of FOR tells us it is supporting the conclusion.

Now, when we know the conclusion, let us see the choice that expresses this albeit in different words.

Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach => enables one to inspire that curiosity.

Quote:
(A) To be an intriguing person, one must be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

This is expressing the premise in a bit different wording.

Quote:
(B) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others

This represents X=>Y, in other words as If X, then Y.
Fits our bill, but let us see other choices

Quote:
(C) If one's mind becomes impossible to fully comprehend, one will always be a mystery to others

Reorganizes the Support in different words

Quote:
(D) To inspire the perpetual curiosity of others, one must constantly broaden one's abilities and extend one's intellectual reach

This choice too uses all the terms of conclusion, but 'If X then Y' to 'X is must for Y'. The conclusion says that Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach => enables one to inspire that curiosity. But, this does not mean Curiosity can be inspired ONLY through constantly.....

Quote:
(E) If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach, one will always have curiosity.

X => Y . Here Y is changed from the original meaning

B
_________________
##### General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 17 Jun 2018
Posts: 55
Location: India
Schools: IMD '20
GPA: 2.84
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2019, 11:53

Why is option B correct and D isn't?
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Posts: 50
Re: It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2019, 16:24
It seems that issue is whether B or D is the correct answer.
If we diagram the conclusion we get this :
Constantly broadening one's abilities and extending one's intellectual reach ------> one to inspire that curiosity.

If we diagram D we get this : To inspire the perpetual curiosity of others----------> one must constantly broaden one's abilities and extend one's intellectual reach.This is what we call a mistaken reversal in conditional reasoning. Since main point question types are like must be true question types ,the only form of comditonal reasoning that is accepted is the contrapositive or the repeat form.

diagramming B gives us : If one constantly broadens one's abilities and extends one's intellectual reach-------->one will be able to inspire the perpetual curiosity of others
This is the repeat form and is thus true
Re: It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to   [#permalink] 03 Aug 2019, 16:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# It is a given that to be an intriguing person one must be able to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne