Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:15 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Long Passage|   Social Science|                              
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tkorzhan1995
Joined: 16 Oct 2021
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Expert,

RC00313-01. The author of the passage discusses Krontiris primarily to provide an example of a writer who

A.is highly critical of the writings of certain Renaissance women
B.supports Kelly???s view of women???s status during the Renaissance
C.has misinterpreted the works of certain Renaissance women
D.has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly
E.has studied Renaissance women in a wide variety of social and religious contexts


Which part of passage or what phrase that we can imply K has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly ?
avatar
nayas96
Joined: 26 Jan 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2022
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 45
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?

A.Burckhardt’s view forms the basis for most arguments refuting Kelly's point of view.
B.Burckhardt’s view has been discredited by Kelly.
C.Burckhardt’s view is one that many feminist scholars wish to refute.
D.Burckhardt’s work provides rich historical evidence of inequality between Renaissance women and men.
E.Burckhardt’s work includes historical research supporting the arguments of the feminist scholars.

In the passage, there are two references of femisnist scholar, as given in the lines shown below:

"Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality." --- This line says that feminist scholar cited Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European to explain about the rich historical evidence of women's inequality, which is technically option (D)

"Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one." ---- This line is actually the explaination for option (C)

Just as an observation, all the other question where it has been mentioned "feminist scholar" has the words "highlighted text", clearing which feminist scholar they are talking about.

Is the difference because the option talks about Renaissance women and men and the passage talks about women's inequality?

Kindly please help me solve this issue.
Sajjad1994 KarishmaB BillyZ egmat GMATNinja
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nayas96
3. According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?

A.Burckhardt’s view forms the basis for most arguments refuting Kelly's point of view.
B.Burckhardt’s view has been discredited by Kelly.
C.Burckhardt’s view is one that many feminist scholars wish to refute.
D.Burckhardt’s work provides rich historical evidence of inequality between Renaissance women and men.
E.Burckhardt’s work includes historical research supporting the arguments of the feminist scholars.

In the passage, there are two references of femisnist scholar, as given in the lines shown below:

"Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality." --- This line says that feminist scholar cited Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European to explain about the rich historical evidence of women's inequality, which is technically option (D)

"Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one." ---- This line is actually the explaination for option (C)

Just as an observation, all the other question where it has been mentioned "feminist scholar" has the words "highlighted text", clearing which feminist scholar they are talking about.

Is the difference because the option talks about Renaissance women and men and the passage talks about women's inequality?

Kindly please help me solve this issue.
Sajjad1994 KarishmaB BillyZ egmat GMATNinja

The question doesn't say 'highlighted text' because it doesn't need to say it. It is talking about the feminist scholars who cited Burckhardt’s view. We know who those scholars are.

Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality.

They are the ones who mentioned it as a prelude to their presentation and proceeded to give evidence of why he was wrong.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


Tanchat
Dear Expert,

RC00313-01. The author of the passage discusses Krontiris primarily to provide an example of a writer who

A.is highly critical of the writings of certain Renaissance women
B.supports Kelly???s view of women???s status during the Renaissance
C.has misinterpreted the works of certain Renaissance women
D.has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly
E.has studied Renaissance women in a wide variety of social and religious contexts


Which part of passage or what phrase that we can imply K has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly ?
Let's start by identifying the author's main purpose in each paragraph:

  • Paragraph 1: To point out a recent trend in feminist scholarship on Renaissance women -- more specifically, that many scholars have rejected both Burckhadt's "rosy" view and Kelly's "dark" view.
  • Paragraph 2: To provide an example of one of these recent scholars (Tina Krontiris), who offers a "cautiously optimistic" view on Renaissance women, while also stressing the "social obstacles" they faced.

Let's now consider question #1:

Quote:
The author of the passage discusses Krontiris primarily to provide an example of a writer who
Based on our breakdown of the passage, we see the author discusses Tina Krontiris to provide an example of the recent trend mentioned in the first paragraph. In other words, Krontiris is mentioned as an example of a scholar who rejects both Burckhardt's rosy view and Kelly's dark view.

Let's take a look at (D):

Quote:
D.has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly
This captures the author's purpose in discussing Krontiris, so (D) is correct.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja KarishmaB
For question 498 (According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt's view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?). I found the explanation as to why Choice B is wrong to be a bit vague??in the OG/what has already been discussed on this form. To clarify, is Choice B wrong because Burckhardt's view is not just discredited by Kelly but by OTHER feminist scholars on a broader sense???I was a bit confused because the way the text leads into Kelly's view in that Kelly is an example of a feminist scholar who disagrees, so I initially chose Choice B. I am gently confirming that Choice B is a bit myopic and does not incorporate the OTHER feminist scholars who also have a view?

For question 600 (The author of the passage suggests that Krontiris incorrectly assumes that), I am confused on Choice A's wording. The passage does not seem to say that social differences among Renaissance women are "less important" than the fact that they were women. Instead, Krontiris just seems to look at women as a whole. If it was an important area to Krontiris, would she have studied women of different social classes? Any further insight on this would be greatly appreciated.??

For question 601 (the last sentence in the passage serves primarily to), does the sentence start on line 44? I realize that this may be a silly question, but there is a semicolon included as an independent clause, so I am not sure if the last line is just the part after the semicolon or if it the last sentence starts at line 44. Also, would someone be able to further break down what it means that "women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them"? What is an example of this (e.g., women did not attack the belief that women were supposed to attend to men, etc.?). The OG is also a bit vague in indicating why Choice E is incorrect in that "this does mark a significant departure from both Burckhardt and Kelly, but the distinction between their work and that of other feminist scholars is marked more clearly earlier in the passage."??Is Choice E an example of an answer being "okay" but not the "best" one among the options?

Thank you for bearing through this!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
GMATNinja KarishmaB
For question 498 (According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt's view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?). I found the explanation as to why Choice B is wrong to be a bit vague??in the OG/what has already been discussed on this form. To clarify, is Choice B wrong because Burckhardt's view is not just discredited by Kelly but by OTHER feminist scholars on a broader sense???I was a bit confused because the way the text leads into Kelly's view in that Kelly is an example of a feminist scholar who disagrees, so I initially chose Choice B. I am gently confirming that Choice B is a bit myopic and does not incorporate the OTHER feminist scholars who also have a view?

For question 600 (The author of the passage suggests that Krontiris incorrectly assumes that), I am confused on Choice A's wording. The passage does not seem to say that social differences among Renaissance women are "less important" than the fact that they were women. Instead, Krontiris just seems to look at women as a whole. If it was an important area to Krontiris, would she have studied women of different social classes? Any further insight on this would be greatly appreciated.??

For question 601 (the last sentence in the passage serves primarily to), does the sentence start on line 44? I realize that this may be a silly question, but there is a semicolon included as an independent clause, so I am not sure if the last line is just the part after the semicolon or if it the last sentence starts at line 44. Also, would someone be able to further break down what it means that "women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them"? What is an example of this (e.g., women did not attack the belief that women were supposed to attend to men, etc.?). The OG is also a bit vague in indicating why Choice E is incorrect in that "this does mark a significant departure from both Burckhardt and Kelly, but the distinction between their work and that of other feminist scholars is marked more clearly earlier in the passage."??Is Choice E an example of an answer being "okay" but not the "best" one among the options?

Thank you for bearing through this!

Question 3


Quote:
According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?

C. Burckhardt’s view is one that many feminist scholars wish to refute.
Notice this question is asking for the reason feminist scholars cite Burckhardt's view of Renaissance women. Going to the passage, we see that feminist scholars have rejected "both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one." This tells us that feminist scholars mention Burckhardt in order to reject him. This lines up well with answer choice (C).

Let's now consider (B):

Quote:
B. Burckhardt’s view has been discredited by Kelly.
It's true that Kelly sought to discredit Burckhardt. But the "feminist scholars" mentioned in the passage don't cite Burckhardt because Kelly discredited him. They mention Burckhardt in order to discredit him themselves.

From another angle: notice that Joan Kelly is not one of the "feminist scholars" the passage refers to. In fact, the "feminist scholars" referred to in the passage want to "refute" Kelly. So while Kelly argue against Burckhardt, we wouldn't want to confuse Kelly with the "feminist scholars."

Question 5


To analyze question 5, consider the following points made in the second paragraph:

  • It is "risky" to take writing by middle and upper-class women as "typical of 'female experience' in any general sense."
  • As example of this risky approach -- Krontiris assumes that "women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group."

So Krontiris assumes that women's gender alone allows us to view them as a "homogenous social group." But the author considers this approach "risky." In fact, the author suggests that we shouldn't generalize about the "female experience" just based on the writing of middle and upper-class women.

Now here's (A) again:

Quote:
The author of the passage suggests that Krontiris incorrectly assumes that

A.social differences among Renaissance women are less important than the fact that they were women
The author tells us that Krontiris wrongly assumes that women's gender should allow us to view them as a homogenous social group. But this assumption ignores the fact that we can't generalize about women just based on the views of middle and upper-class women. So because Krontiris wrongly assumes that social differences are less important than gender, (A) is correct.

Question 6


As semicolons don't create new sentences, you should consider everything starting with "Krontiris is concerned..." all the way to the end of the passage as the "last sentence."

Regarding the phrase "women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them," the example you cite looks great. An ideology that oppresses women might be that "women should attend to men," and the passage suggests that women seldom attacked these kinds of ideas.

Let's now consider answer choice (C):

Quote:
The last sentence in the passage serves primarily to

C.show a way in which Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic" assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements
In the second-to-last sentence, the author tells us that Krontiris's significant contribution was to offer a "cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women's achievements." Next, the last sentence provides an example to back up this statement. More specifically, the last sentence shows how Krontiris's argument is optimistic, since her argument shows women "negotiating some power for themselves." At the same time, the last sentence shows that Krontiris's optimism is cautious, since she points out that "women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them."

Since this lines up well with (C), it's correct.

Let's now consider (E):

Quote:
E.illustrate the way in which Krontiris’s study differs from the studies done by Burckhardt and Kelly
The last sentence absolutely does illustrate the way in which Krontiris's study differs from Burckhardt's and Kelly's. However, this is definitely not the purpose of the sentence. By this point in the passage, the author is no longer primarily concerned with Burckhardt and Kelly. Rather, the author is exploring the ideas of Krontiris, and the last sentence supports the view that her work is "cautiously optimistic."

So because (E) does not capture the author's "primary purpose" in the last sentence, it's incorrect.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Namangupta1997
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 145
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ThatDudeKnows

The last line of the passage is after a semi-colon. My failure to understand whether the last line is an opinion of Krontiris or the author himself really impeded my ability to arrive at the answer. The last line is an independent statement. If we see the structure of the passage, it seems like a continuation of Krontiris's thoughts. It could also be a comment made by the author on Krontiris's interpretation on women. How can we be sure?
User avatar
ThatDudeKnows
Joined: 11 May 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,070
Kudos: 977
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Hi ThatDudeKnows

The last line of the passage is after a semi-colon. My failure to understand whether the last line is an opinion of Krontiris or the author himself really impeded my ability to arrive at the answer. The last line is an independent statement. If we see the structure of the passage, it seems like a continuation of Krontiris's thoughts. It could also be a comment made by the author on Krontiris's interpretation on women. How can we be sure?

Namangupta1997

Interesting question. You don't note in your message which of the passage questions tripped you up as a result of the semicolon confusion. Which one got you?

My answer to your direct question is that I don't know that it matters. The author seems to share the view with Krontiris that women, literate or not, faced social obstacles in raising their "oppositional voices," and that verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly restricted. So, the part after the semicolon is a logical next step for both the author and Krontiris. If Krontiris and the author disagreed about the point, I think we'd see some clarity about to whom that last bit applies.
User avatar
achloes
Joined: 16 Oct 2020
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 252
Own Kudos:
215
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,382
GMAT 1: 460 Q28 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 610 Q39 V35
GMAT 4: 650 Q42 V38
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 5: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 252
Kudos: 215
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
RC00313-03. According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?

A.Burckhardt’s view forms the basis for most arguments refuting Kelly's point of view.
B.Burckhardt’s view has been discredited by Kelly.
C.Burckhardt’s view is one that many feminist scholars wish to refute.
D.Burckhardt’s work provides rich historical evidence of inequality between Renaissance women and men.
E.Burckhardt’s work includes historical research supporting the arguments of the feminist scholars.

KarishmaB GMATNinja

I decided to go with D as the passage clearly states that Burckhardt's view was repeatedly cited as prelude to feminist scholars' presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. Does this not sufficiently tell us why his work was cited?

Also, I couldn't justify option C as I was unable to find any support for it.

Appreciate your help!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


achloes
Quote:
RC00313-03. According to the passage, feminist scholars cite Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?

A.Burckhardt’s view forms the basis for most arguments refuting Kelly's point of view.
B.Burckhardt’s view has been discredited by Kelly.
C.Burckhardt’s view is one that many feminist scholars wish to refute.
D.Burckhardt’s work provides rich historical evidence of inequality between Renaissance women and men.
E.Burckhardt’s work includes historical research supporting the arguments of the feminist scholars.

url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=KarishmaB]KarishmaB[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url]

I decided to go with D as the passage clearly states that Burckhardt's view was repeatedly cited as prelude to feminist scholars' presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. Does this not sufficiently tell us why his work was cited?

Also, I couldn't justify option C as I was unable to find any support for it.

Appreciate your help!
Take another look at the exact language of the first sentence of the passage:

    "Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality.

What's happening is this: Burckhardt made a bold statement that women were totally equal during the Renaissance. Feminist scholars quote him, and then launch into their OWN presentation about how wrong Burckhardt was. They argue that women were actual NOT equal -- they just include Burckhardt at the beginning to really highlight how off-base his statement was.

So, feminist scholars are definitely not citing Burckhadrt because his work "provides rich historical evidence of inequality between Renaissance women and men." Their own work provides the rich evidence, and they mention Burckhardt because they think he's kind of an idiot.

Eliminate (D).

As for (C), the above analysis shows feminist scholars refuting Burckhardt’s view, and there's more evidence later in the same paragraph when the author describes "a significant trend among feminist scholars [that] has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one."

(C) is the correct answer for question 3.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 418
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 418
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dear experts, avigutman, AndrewN,MartyTargetTestPrep , RonTargetTestPrep

I am afraid I did get the role of Tina Krontiris in the passage, and her view different with that feminist scholar or Jacob Burckhardt or Joan Kelly

from the paragraph 1, we know JK rejected JB, feminist scholars rejected both views of JK and JB, the view of scholars can be seen in a trend

from paragraph 2, TK is an example of trend that focus on middle-upper women.

above all, we can infer TK is on the same side feminist scholars who rejected view of both JB and JK.
so Tk is as a positive example of the trend, if we view the view of feminist scholars is positive.

then , what I confused is that why a positive example will have an incorrect assumption.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
dear experts, avigutman, AndrewN,MartyTargetTestPrep , RonTargetTestPrep

I am afraid I did get the role of Tina Krontiris in the passage, and her view different with that feminist scholar or Jacob Burckhardt or Joan Kelly

from the paragraph 1, we know JK rejected JB, feminist scholars rejected both views of JK and JB, the view of scholars can be seen in a trend

from paragraph 2, TK is an example of trend that focus on middle-upper women.

above all, we can infer TK is on the same side feminist scholars who rejected view of both JB and JK.
so Tk is as a positive example of the trend, if we view the view of feminist scholars is positive.

then , what I confused is that why a positive example will have an incorrect assumption.
The author presents the trend overall as positive but cites Tina Krontiris as an example of someone who has been involved in that trend but has made an incorrect assumption, "that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis."
User avatar
SnorLax_7
Joined: 19 Nov 2022
Last visit: 22 Sep 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,925
Posts: 87
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, MartyMurray GMATNinja ChiranjeevSingh AnishPassi KarishmaB EMPOWERgmatVerbal

Quote:
Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.”

Kindly can you let me know what is the use of 'subordinate clause' starting from 'although she also stresses..' if she already captured the balance view in 'cautiously optimistic assesment'.

Quote:
RC00313-06. The last sentence in the passage serves primarily to

A.suggest that Krontiris’s work is not representative of recent trends among feminist scholars
B.undermine the argument that literate women of the Renaissance sought to oppose social constraints imposed on them
C.show a way in which Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic"assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements
D.summarize Krontiris’s view of the effect of literacy on the lives of upper- and middle-class Renaissance women
E.illustrate the way in which Krontiris’s study differs from the studies done by Burckhardt and Kelly

I rejected C because I thought C was only pointing on 1 view (cautious positive one) and not the other one (negative view). and E, though not primarly put to serve that purpose, is still making sense.

pls can you let me know where I am going wrong ?

Thanks !
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,630
Own Kudos:
6,117
 [2]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,630
Kudos: 6,117
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SnorLax_7
Quote:
Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.”

Kindly can you let me know what is the use of 'subordinate clause' starting from 'although she also stresses..' if she already captured the balance view in 'cautiously optimistic assesment'.
Notice that the clause starting with "although" is about the fact that she "stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced," whereas the preceding part of the sentence is about a different topic, the fact that she offers "a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements."

So, the cautiously optimistic assessment is of "achievements," and what she "stresses" is "social obstacles."

Thus, we have a contrast between the two parts of the sentence: her optimistic assessment of "achievements" is contrasted with her stress on "social obstacles," in other words a stress on issues.

Quote:
Quote:
RC00313-06. The last sentence in the passage serves primarily to

A.suggest that Krontiris’s work is not representative of recent trends among feminist scholars
B.undermine the argument that literate women of the Renaissance sought to oppose social constraints imposed on them
C.show a way in which Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic"assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements
D.summarize Krontiris’s view of the effect of literacy on the lives of upper- and middle-class Renaissance women
E.illustrate the way in which Krontiris’s study differs from the studies done by Burckhardt and Kelly

I rejected C because I thought C was only pointing on 1 view (cautious positive one) and not the other one (negative view). and E, though not primarly put to serve that purpose, is still making sense.

pls can you let me know where I am going wrong ?

Thanks !
Do you have the sentences straight? I'm just wondering whether you have confused the next to last sentence with the last one.
User avatar
SnorLax_7
Joined: 19 Nov 2022
Last visit: 22 Sep 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,925
Posts: 87
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Do you have the sentences straight? I'm just wondering whether you have confused the next to last sentence with the last one.

MartyMurray Thanks for the kind response. No, I am not confused there.

Quote:
Thus, we have a contrast between the two parts of the sentence: her optimistic assessment of "achievements" is contrasted with her stress on "social obstacles," in other words a stress on issues.

if above is the case, then the last line which also includes "but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them." is primarily supporting the whole previous sentence and not just 'cautiously optimistic assessment'.
I think I am not wrong to assume that "such verbal opposition" in the last sentence is referring to “oppositional voices.” in the previous sentence.

Pls correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks !
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,630
Own Kudos:
6,117
 [1]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,630
Kudos: 6,117
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SnorLax_7

Quote:
Do you have the sentences straight? I'm just wondering whether you have confused the next to last sentence with the last one.

MartyMurray Thanks for the kind response. No, I am not confused there.

Quote:
Thus, we have a contrast between the two parts of the sentence: her optimistic assessment of "achievements" is contrasted with her stress on "social obstacles," in other words a stress on issues.

if above is the case, then the last line which also includes "but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them." is primarily supporting the whole previous sentence and not just 'cautiously optimistic assessment'.
I think I am not wrong to assume that "such verbal opposition" in the last sentence is referring to “oppositional voices.” in the previous sentence.

Pls correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks !
It's correct that "such verbal opposition" in the last sentence is referrring to "oppostional voices" in the previous sentence.

At the same time, that doesn't mean that the last sentence is illustrating the entire previous sentence. Rather, the last sentence mentions the "verbal opposition" in showing how Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic"assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements.
Quote:
I rejected C because I thought C was only pointing on 1 view (cautious positive one) and not the other one (negative view). and E, though not primarly put to serve that purpose, is still making sense.
Here's the last sentence of the passage:

Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; ....

We see that the last sentence is about just her "cautiously optimistic assessment." It says that she showed that they "negotiated SOME power" while, at the same time, their verbal opposition was "circumscribed." What she showed represents a "cautiously optimistic assessment."

The fact that the last sentence mentions "constraining ideologies," "verbal opposition," and "cultural stereotypes" doesn't mean that it doesn't show how Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic"assessment. She mentioned those things in the process of providing her assessment.

So, (C) accurately describes what the last sentence serves to do.

(E) is incorrect because, although the last sentence does indicate how Krontiris's work differed from that of Burckhardt and Kelly, the purpose of the last sentence is not to illustrate that difference. So, (E) does not describe what the last sentence "serves to" do.
User avatar
XLmafia21
Joined: 23 Aug 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 320
Products:
Posts: 21
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For the last question "The author of the passage implies that the women studied by Krontiris are unusual in which of the following ways?", can someone explain me how can we infer option D from the lines "The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record." ?
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts