winterschool
Q1. Opponents of free university-education in the country feel that allocating resources to providing free post-high school education would be wastage of the tax-payers money. They claim that no significant economic benefit will be realized from the same since most people with degrees will likely do such jobs in the country for which they are over-qualified and that the most bright and academically oriented people from economically underprivileged backgrounds do anyway benefit from the various scholarships already in place by the government. Which of the following is an assumption on which the opponents’ argument is based? A. The money that the government currently collects in taxes is not sufficient to finance free- university education in the country. B. As the free university-education program is implemented, the economy will not generate enough jobs commensurate with the educational level of the graduates. C. The most bright and academically oriented people normally do not have the economic means to pursue university education. D. Currently, there is a shortage of suitable jobs in the country for people with university level education. E. Many people who obtain degrees after the free university-education program is implemented will not choose to work within the country.
winterschool
Q2. Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately,
the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However,
since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? (A) The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument’s main conclusion. (B) The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome. (C) The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction. (D) The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction. (E) The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument’s main conclusion. Difficulty - Hard
CR Questions March - 22 :Q1. In Tavernia, many road accidents result from driving on the wrong side of the road. Aiming for safer city roads, the city council has decided to impose heavy fines on such cases of wrongful driving, thereby aiming to reduce the number of fatalities caused by such cases. Though traffic department officials agree that the fines will reduce the related cases of traffic violation and possibly the number of fatalities resulting from them, they still think that the roads would not be much safer than they are now.
Which of the following statements best supports the officials’ stance regarding the effects of the proposed penalty?
A. Most accidents caused by driving on the wrong side of the road are caused by escaped convicts being chased by police.
B. A significant number of road fatalities are a result of the driver driving the vehicle on the wrong side of the road.
C. The traffic department plans to build safer pavements and better night lighting systems on all major roads, utilizing the revenue acquired through the proposed penalties.
D. Many accidents involving people driving on the wrong side of the road do not result in hospitalization or fatalities.
E. Few if any of the accidents that occur when people do not follow speed limits in school areas will be avoided by imposing the fines recommended by city council.
Q2. Last year, Energy Corp’s oil sales increased suddenly in the region of lower Ossamia. The Chief Financial Officer of the company explained this increase as the result of industrialization in the developing Ossamian nation of Kokua. He predicts that, consequently, trade made possible by industrialization will grow between Kokua and its Ossamian neighbors this year, leading to further increases in Energy Corp sales in the region.
Each of the following, if true, provides some support for the CFO’s prediction described above EXCEPT:
A. Although non-Ossamian countries have a military and trade presence in Ossamia, their oil sales last year in the region were not significantly above normal levels.
B. Mines accessing Kokua’s rich natural resources were put into operation for the first time last year.
C. Each of the Ossamian countries currently have few restrictions in place on the business that can be done with its neighboring countries.
D. One of Energy Corp’s primary competitors had a tanker accident early last year that caused environmental damage in Ossamia and damaged the company’s standing in the area.
E. One of Ossamia’s neighbors, a developing nation, has a growing population with a reasonable amount of disposable wealth.