Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 1410:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
Top Scores Start with a Elite Online Prep Course. Enroll for 6 months of access to over 400 hours of GMAT video lessons AND 715+ Score Guarantee!
Aug 1410:00 AM IST
-10:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Aug 1512:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 15th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PST- Aug 11
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
- Know exactly what to study, every day - Built by the GMAT Club community - 100% free, no sign-up needed - Aug 18
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Strong applicants do not always write strong MBA essays. In this session, we break down 5 common MBA essay mistakes that can quietly weaken an otherwise competitive application. These are not beginner mistakes .... - Aug 18
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Is GMAT Quant really a math test? Many test takers approach GMAT Quant with one of two beliefs: either “I’m not a math person, so I’ll struggle,” or “I’m good at math, so Quant should be easy.” But the GMAT often surprises both groups. - Aug 18
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
In this episode of the GMAT Ninja Podcast, Charles and Brian Prestia bring six of the wildest GMAT improvement stories they’ve seen across decades of teaching. 
Aug 2210:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays August 22, 2026 - Nov. 14, 2026, 10:00am-1:00pm EST
Shivam2027
Joined: 19 Dec 2025
Last visit: 14 Aug 2026
Posts: 73
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: CBS '27 Duke '27 Haas '27 INSEAD Jan '27 Kellogg '27 LBS '27 Ross '27 Sloan '27 Stanford '27 Stern '27 Wharton '27 Yale '27 Booth '27 Darden '27
GPA: 3.1
WE:Consulting (Non-Profit)
Products:
30 Jul 2026, 18:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
gave it at pearson vue ,
1) Quants :- did 2 mistakes in start , one qn wrong in arrangements and one twisted percentage question , and then i never saw a difficult question , should have given more time in first 5 question
2) VARC :- because i knew i f.d up in qa , it got carried with me into varc section , i was very slow at the start and then i had to rush it. I got 3 RC in a row of medium length and a very long RC in the end; difficulty came down in the end, which means i performed badly in the middle part
3) DI :- idk why I felt in the first half of DI that I was doing good, got 1 msr, was feeling confident in answering the questions, but in the end questions got easier, and i scored 80, which was shocking for me because I felt that I did good in most of the part of di,
Overall, I can do better in all three sections. I will reattempt; pray for me, guys, I need it
1) Quants :- did 2 mistakes in start , one qn wrong in arrangements and one twisted percentage question , and then i never saw a difficult question , should have given more time in first 5 question
2) VARC :- because i knew i f.d up in qa , it got carried with me into varc section , i was very slow at the start and then i had to rush it. I got 3 RC in a row of medium length and a very long RC in the end; difficulty came down in the end, which means i performed badly in the middle part
3) DI :- idk why I felt in the first half of DI that I was doing good, got 1 msr, was feeling confident in answering the questions, but in the end questions got easier, and i scored 80, which was shocking for me because I felt that I did good in most of the part of di,
Overall, I can do better in all three sections. I will reattempt; pray for me, guys, I need it
30 Jul 2026, 21:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
First, respect for posting this. Most people finish a rough attempt and go quiet. You came back and wrote a section-by-section post-mortem. That instinct will serve you better than the score you just got (what was that score BTW).
Now let me push back on something, because it will decide how your reattempt goes.
Every single observation in your debrief is about the test. None of it is about your ability.
When the difficulty dropped. How many minutes you gave the first five questions. Where you rushed. When things felt easy. Read your own post again — there isn't one line about what you can and cannot actually do. And ability is the only thing that moves a score.
1. Drop the "more time on the first 5" plan
There is no front-loading premium. Every question carries weight. Spending three extra minutes on Q1–Q5 doesn't buy you a higher score — it steals time from the back half. Which is exactly what you described happening in Verbal: slow start, then a scramble. If you carry this belief into the reattempt, you will reproduce the same outcome on purpose.
2. Stop trying to read difficulty
You did this in all three sections. "I never saw a difficult question." "Difficulty came down at the end, which means I performed badly in the middle." "Felt I did well in DI, scored 80."
Let me give you a data point. I have written and reviewed 5,000+ questions. I know the framework, I know the traps, I know the statistics behind the items. And even I can predict the difficulty level of a question correctly only about 70% of the time.
That is someone who builds these things for a living, sitting at a desk, with no clock running and no score on the line. You were 90 minutes into a live exam, adrenaline up, trying to do it between questions.
So when you tell me the questions got easier, what you are really telling me is that they felt easier. Those are not the same claim. And notice the pattern hiding in your DI section: you felt confident through most of it and scored 80. If your read on your own performance were reliable, that score would not have shocked you. That gap — between what you felt and what you scored — is the single most valuable finding from this attempt. It means you currently have no accurate internal picture of your own accuracy.
3. The Verbal point is the most honest thing you wrote
QA went sideways and it followed you into the next section. That is not a temperament flaw. That is what happens when your ability isn't solid enough to be self-evident to you. When you actually know your accuracy on medium and hard questions, sub-section by sub-section, a shaky start cannot rattle you — you have evidence instead of a feeling. Build the ability and the composure arrives on its own. It is not a separate project.
Two questions before you plan anything.
Q1. What were your mock scores going in? Total and all three sections, and which mocks you took. This matters more than anything else you've told me:
Q2. How do you plan to build your improvement plan? Not "I'll revise Quant and do more RCs" — tell me the mechanism. What data will you look at to decide what to work on? Sub-section accuracy split by difficulty level? Time-per-question plotted against accuracy? An error log tagged by root cause rather than by topic?
Whatever you use, it has to be able to answer why you missed the arrangements question and the twisted percentage question. Conceptual gap, process gap, or careless slip — those are three different diseases with three different cures, and "I'll be more careful next time" cures none of them.
Answer those two and you are more likely to be on the right path!!
Along with prayers, you need a diagnosis. And you've already shown you can be honest with yourself, which is the harder half of this.
Now let me push back on something, because it will decide how your reattempt goes.
Every single observation in your debrief is about the test. None of it is about your ability.
When the difficulty dropped. How many minutes you gave the first five questions. Where you rushed. When things felt easy. Read your own post again — there isn't one line about what you can and cannot actually do. And ability is the only thing that moves a score.
1. Drop the "more time on the first 5" plan
There is no front-loading premium. Every question carries weight. Spending three extra minutes on Q1–Q5 doesn't buy you a higher score — it steals time from the back half. Which is exactly what you described happening in Verbal: slow start, then a scramble. If you carry this belief into the reattempt, you will reproduce the same outcome on purpose.
2. Stop trying to read difficulty
You did this in all three sections. "I never saw a difficult question." "Difficulty came down at the end, which means I performed badly in the middle." "Felt I did well in DI, scored 80."
Let me give you a data point. I have written and reviewed 5,000+ questions. I know the framework, I know the traps, I know the statistics behind the items. And even I can predict the difficulty level of a question correctly only about 70% of the time.
That is someone who builds these things for a living, sitting at a desk, with no clock running and no score on the line. You were 90 minutes into a live exam, adrenaline up, trying to do it between questions.
So when you tell me the questions got easier, what you are really telling me is that they felt easier. Those are not the same claim. And notice the pattern hiding in your DI section: you felt confident through most of it and scored 80. If your read on your own performance were reliable, that score would not have shocked you. That gap — between what you felt and what you scored — is the single most valuable finding from this attempt. It means you currently have no accurate internal picture of your own accuracy.
3. The Verbal point is the most honest thing you wrote
QA went sideways and it followed you into the next section. That is not a temperament flaw. That is what happens when your ability isn't solid enough to be self-evident to you. When you actually know your accuracy on medium and hard questions, sub-section by sub-section, a shaky start cannot rattle you — you have evidence instead of a feeling. Build the ability and the composure arrives on its own. It is not a separate project.
Two questions before you plan anything.
Q1. What were your mock scores going in? Total and all three sections, and which mocks you took. This matters more than anything else you've told me:
- If your mocks were well above what you scored, this is an execution problem — and we fix process and stamina.
- If your mocks were sitting right around what you scored, then nothing went wrong on test day at all. The ability simply wasn't built yet. In that case your prep needs to change, not your test strategy.
Q2. How do you plan to build your improvement plan? Not "I'll revise Quant and do more RCs" — tell me the mechanism. What data will you look at to decide what to work on? Sub-section accuracy split by difficulty level? Time-per-question plotted against accuracy? An error log tagged by root cause rather than by topic?
Whatever you use, it has to be able to answer why you missed the arrangements question and the twisted percentage question. Conceptual gap, process gap, or careless slip — those are three different diseases with three different cures, and "I'll be more careful next time" cures none of them.
Answer those two and you are more likely to be on the right path!!
Along with prayers, you need a diagnosis. And you've already shown you can be honest with yourself, which is the harder half of this.
Shivam2027
Moderator:
