Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 22:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 22:24
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 24 Jul 2020, 21:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gewinston
Hello, how does "D" resolve the conflict? I was looking for a statement to explain why both are both, not a new idea to solve how to a goal. I know this is splitting hairs about I was looking for something like "B". Fatty food vs cigarettes etc. How is a tax the answer, the government could tax fatty food also well? What makes cigarettes different from fatty food, the answer is a tax to dissuade the consumer? The answer does not seem correct.
Show more
Have you tried reviewing this post?
User avatar
mSKR
User avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 10 Feb 2021, 19:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Our task is to find an answer choice that "most helps to resolve the apparent conflict between Kendrick's statements." So, we need to find a statement that explains how both conclusions can be valid at the same time. With that in mind, let's go through the answer choices:
Show more

I have memorized this concept in order to tackle any further complex question on resolving a paradox.

Thanks GMATNinja
User avatar
Anandanwar
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 2,991
Products:
Forum Quiz
Posts: 55
Kudos: 8
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 14 Mar 2022, 09:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,

I have a query regarding Choice D here.

Choice D says Government 'should' try to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes...

It describes an obligation.

But it does not mean that Government actually does that. So it does not seem to resolve the conflict.

Choice B atleast gives an alternate reason why government can stop cigarettes from being advertised.
So B seems a better choice.

Could you please explain where I have gone wrong?

Regards,
Ankit
User avatar
unraveled
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,720
Own Kudos:
2,259
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,720
Kudos: 2,259
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 15 Mar 2022, 09:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anandanwar
Hello,

I have a query regarding Choice D here.

Choice D says Government 'should' try to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes...

It describes an obligation.

But it does not mean that Government actually does that. So it does not seem to resolve the conflict.

Choice B atleast gives an alternate reason why government can stop cigarettes from being advertised.
So B seems a better choice.

Could you please explain where I have gone wrong?

Regards,
Ankit
Show more

Quote:
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from being advertised are justified in doing so, since such advertisements encourage people to engage in an unhealthy practice. But cigarette advertisements should remain legal since advertisements for fatty foods are legal, even though those advertisements also encourage people to engage in unhealthy practices.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict between Kendrick's statements?

(A) Any advertisement that encourages people to engage in an unhealthy practice should be made illegal, even though the legality of some such advertisements is currently uncontroversial
(B) The advertisement of fattening foods, unlike that of cigarettes, should not be prevented, because fattening foods, unlike cigarettes, are not addictive.
(C) Most advertisements should be legal, although advertisers are always morally responsible for ensuring that their advertisements do not encourage people to engage in unhealthy practices.
(D) Governments should try to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes by means of financial disincentives rather than by legal prohibition.
(E) Governments should place restrictions on cigarette advertisements so as to keep them from encouraging people to engage in unhealthy practices, but should not try to prevent such advertisements.
Show more

Two reasons that i find B is wrong for:
1. Conclusion is 'cigarette advertisements should remain legal' so anything other than this is basically a diversion from the core of the argument - 'The advertisement of fattening foods should not be prevented' is not a concern here. This is a major reason to eliminate B.
2. Even if B tries hard to give a reason for how the discrepancy can be resolved, it does so by apparently focusing on fatty acids advertisements and that too with a cause that is not related to cigarette advertisements.

HTH.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 17 Mar 2022, 07:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anandanwar
Hello,

I have a query regarding Choice D here.

Choice D says Government 'should' try to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes...

It describes an obligation.

But it does not mean that Government actually does that. So it does not seem to resolve the conflict.

Choice B atleast gives an alternate reason why government can stop cigarettes from being advertised.
So B seems a better choice.

Could you please explain where I have gone wrong?

Regards,
Ankit
Show more
Have you tried reviewing this post?
User avatar
Ahmed31
User avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2022
Last visit: 31 Jul 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 18
Kudos: 5
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 17 Feb 2023, 02:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
mikeCoolBoy
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from being advertised are justified in doing so, since such advertisements encourage people to engage in an unhealthy practice. But cigarette advertisements should remain legal since advertisements for fatty foods are legal, even though those advertisements also encourage people to engage in unhealthy practices.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent conflict between Kendrick's statements?

(A) Any advertisement that encourages people to engage in an unhealthy practice should be made illegal, even though the legality of some such advertisements is currently uncontroversial
(B) The advertisement of fattening foods, unlike that of cigarettes, should not be prevented, because fattening foods, unlike cigarettes, are not addictive.
(C) Most advertisements should be legal, although advertisers are always morally responsible for ensuring that their advertisements do not encourage people to engage in unhealthy practices.
(D) Governments should try to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes by means of financial disincentives rather than by legal prohibition.
(E) Governments should place restrictions on cigarette advertisements so as to keep them from encouraging people to engage in unhealthy practices, but should not try to prevent such advertisements.
Show more


Hi @experts ,

In resolving the paradox -
Aren't we suppose to resolve why or how two conditions presently exist rather than by presenting an alternative plan to how can the condition exist in future ?

Regards,
Ahmed
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes from 16 Apr 2025, 12:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts