Alright, many of you with access to my profile already have seen the debate, but since this "help me decide" thing is so popular, I'm going to join in. Throw in any comments you may have, but here's the 911 on me, simplified from the one on my profile. If you want a more in depth discussion, go to my profile. If you just want to throw in your 2 cents (literally I mean 2 cents), then vote here.
Goals: Tech management or Tech Entrepreneurship (most likely the later), potential international business in Asia. I want to work in California after graduating, for sure.
Haas Strengths:1. Weather
2. Location (for future work)
3. Strength in Tech and Entrepreneurship
4. "Ranked" #7 now, potential M8 school
5. Smaller program
6. Scholarship (50% - <10% selectivity)
7. Parent School Strength (Berkeley)
8. Well known in Asia
Kellogg Strengths:1. Better General Management and Strategy
2. Higher General School Rank, UE school
3. Larger alumni network
4. Private School Resources
5. Scholarship (50% - < 4% selectivity)
6. Adds to my existing school networks (Diversify)
Anderson Strengths:1. Very strong Entrepreneurship (though not in tech)
2. International programs are strong, especially in Asia and Latin America
3. Scholarship (2/3, not sure of selectivity)
4. Adds to my existing school networks (diversify)
5. Larger alumni network (than Haas)
6. Weather is amazing (though smoggy)
alright, let the Battle Royale 2 commence!