Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:40 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SergejK
Joined: 22 Mar 2024
Last visit: 02 May 2025
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
780
 [29]
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 162
Kudos: 780
 [29]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [4]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abi2001thomas
Joined: 26 Nov 2023
Last visit: 04 May 2025
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States (TX)
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abi2001thomas
The correct answer that is stated on the GMAT Practice Test is No, No, Yes. Could you please explain why your answer is different from this?
I'm not sure what's going on. Sometimes, the test uses the same table for different questions though. So, perhaps, the question you're referring to is actually a somewhat different question.
User avatar
BeatriceHYL
Joined: 16 Dec 2024
Last visit: 15 Feb 2025
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@[color=#683d3d]MartyMurray[/color] For this statement "Lauren purchased a new book. In order to fulfill the criteria "with an average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00.". Lauren would have to pick Curious George at the Aquarium(used hardcover, $3.99), Eels (new hardcover, $25.99), Fish(used hardcover, $11.00), and Saving Fish from Drowning (new hardcover, $7.98), which in total is two new books, instead of a new book. isn't it? So why is this statement "Lauren purchased a new book." correct?
MartyMurray
Lauren wants to assemble a collection of books with fish-themed titles by shopping at her local bookstore. On the bookstore's website, she searched for the keyword fish. The search returned only the results shown in the table. From the copies in stock included in the search results, Lauren purchased 4 books with distinct titles from 4 different sections with an average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00.

TitleAuthorFormatSectionCopies
in stock
Price
Curious George at
the Aquarium
Rey,
Margaret
used
hardcover
children's1$3.99
Curious George
Goes Fishing
Rey, H. A.new
hardcover
children's3$2.98
EelsProsek,
James
new
hardcover
science1$25.99
FishBittman,
Mark
used
hardcover
cooking2$11.00
FishBittman,
Mark
new
paperback
cooking4$9.98
Float-fishing
Strategies
Streeks,
E. Neale
new
paperback
outdoors0$19.95
SalmonMorgan,
Diane
new
paperback
cooking2$9.98
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amyused
paperback
literature6$2.63
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amynew
paperback
literature1$7.98

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true about the purchase that Lauren made. Otherwise, select No.


This question emphasizes the constraints aspect of Data Insights. So, while a little sorting of the table helps with answering this question, answering this Table Analysis question works much like answering a typical Two-Part Analysis question that involves multiple constraints that we must consider.

The constraints presented by the passage are the following:

4 books

Distinct titles

From 4 different sections

An average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00

Also, we have to be careful not to miss the fact that the books she purchases were "in stock" and "included in the search results."

With those constraints in mind, let's consider the statements to see which ones are supported by the provided information.

Lauren purchased a new book.

Since the passage says that she purchased books "in stock" from "4 different sections," to see whether this statement is supported, let's see whether she can purchase in stock books from 4 different sections without purchasing a new book.

Sorting by section, we see that there are 5 sections: children's, cooking, literature, outdoors, and science.

Now, one key move can save us a lot of time and trouble, and that move is to notice that the number of copies in stock of the only outdoors book is 0. So, we know for sure that Lauren did not purchase an outdoors book.

So, she has just the other four sections to choose from.

Now, scanning the Format column, we see that the only science book is a "new hardcover." So, since Lauren purchased books from "4 different sections" and thus must have purchased a science book, we know that she purchased a new book.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased a book from the cooking section.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the cooking section.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased Eels.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the science section.


The only book in the science section is Eels. So, Lauren must have purchased Eels.

Another way we can confirm that she purchased Eels is to determine that the arithmetic mean of the books Lauren purchased could not have been over $12.00 if she had not purchased Eels as follows.

Taking the highest priced book from each of the 4 sections other than science, we get the following 4 prices.

Children's: 3.99

Cooking: 11:00

Literature: 7.98

Outdoors: 19.95

Adding up those prices, we see that they add up to approximately $43.

Since 43/4 < 12, we know that Lauren must have bought a higher priced book, and the only such book is Eels. So, she must have bought Eels.

Of course, none of that work is necessary since we know that there are no outdoors books in stock. So, Lauren must have bought the only science book, Eels. Still, it's a little interesting to see that they gave us two paths to the correct answer for the third statement.

Select Yes.

Correct answer: Yes, Yes, Yes
User avatar
Krsharma2614
Joined: 28 May 2024
Last visit: 25 Jan 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No, No, Yes is the answer to a different question wherein Lauren is purchasing 5 books with different titles and 4 different sections, with minimum possible price. The question stem is slightly different.
abi2001thomas
The correct answer that is stated on the GMAT Practice Test is No, No, Yes. Could you please explain why your answer is different from this?
MartyMurray
Lauren wants to assemble a collection of books with fish-themed titles by shopping at her local bookstore. On the bookstore's website, she searched for the keyword fish. The search returned only the results shown in the table. From the copies in stock included in the search results, Lauren purchased 4 books with distinct titles from 4 different sections with an average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00.

TitleAuthorFormatSectionCopies
in stock
Price
Curious George at
the Aquarium
Rey,
Margaret
used
hardcover
children's1$3.99
Curious George
Goes Fishing
Rey, H. A.new
hardcover
children's3$2.98
EelsProsek,
James
new
hardcover
science1$25.99
FishBittman,
Mark
used
hardcover
cooking2$11.00
FishBittman,
Mark
new
paperback
cooking4$9.98
Float-fishing
Strategies
Streeks,
E. Neale
new
paperback
outdoors0$19.95
SalmonMorgan,
Diane
new
paperback
cooking2$9.98
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amyused
paperback
literature6$2.63
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amynew
paperback
literature1$7.98

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true about the purchase that Lauren made. Otherwise, select No.


This question emphasizes the constraints aspect of Data Insights. So, while a little sorting of the table helps with answering this question, answering this Table Analysis question works much like answering a typical Two-Part Analysis question that involves multiple constraints that we must consider.

The constraints presented by the passage are the following:

4 books

Distinct titles

From 4 different sections

An average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00

Also, we have to be careful not to miss the fact that the books she purchases were "in stock" and "included in the search results."

With those constraints in mind, let's consider the statements to see which ones are supported by the provided information.

Lauren purchased a new book.

Since the passage says that she purchased books "in stock" from "4 different sections," to see whether this statement is supported, let's see whether she can purchase in stock books from 4 different sections without purchasing a new book.

Sorting by section, we see that there are 5 sections: children's, cooking, literature, outdoors, and science.

Now, one key move can save us a lot of time and trouble, and that move is to notice that the number of copies in stock of the only outdoors book is 0. So, we know for sure that Lauren did not purchase an outdoors book.

So, she has just the other four sections to choose from.

Now, scanning the Format column, we see that the only science book is a "new hardcover." So, since Lauren purchased books from "4 different sections" and thus must have purchased a science book, we know that she purchased a new book.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased a book from the cooking section.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the cooking section.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased Eels.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the science section.


The only book in the science section is Eels. So, Lauren must have purchased Eels.

Another way we can confirm that she purchased Eels is to determine that the arithmetic mean of the books Lauren purchased could not have been over $12.00 if she had not purchased Eels as follows.

Taking the highest priced book from each of the 4 sections other than science, we get the following 4 prices.

Children's: 3.99

Cooking: 11:00

Literature: 7.98

Outdoors: 19.95

Adding up those prices, we see that they add up to approximately $43.

Since 43/4 < 12, we know that Lauren must have bought a higher priced book, and the only such book is Eels. So, she must have bought Eels.

Of course, none of that work is necessary since we know that there are no outdoors books in stock. So, Lauren must have bought the only science book, Eels. Still, it's a little interesting to see that they gave us two paths to the correct answer for the third statement.

Select Yes.

Correct answer: Yes, Yes, Yes
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If the statement was "Lauren purchased exactly one new book" the answer would be No. However, "Lauren purchased a new book" - Yes she did, we're not concerned with how many. Hence, the answer is Yes.

Hope it helps.
BeatriceHYL
@[color=#683d3d]MartyMurray[/color] For this statement "Lauren purchased a new book. In order to fulfill the criteria "with an average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00.". Lauren would have to pick Curious George at the Aquarium(used hardcover, $3.99), Eels (new hardcover, $25.99), Fish(used hardcover, $11.00), and Saving Fish from Drowning (new hardcover, $7.98), which in total is two new books, instead of a new book. isn't it? So why is this statement "Lauren purchased a new book." correct?
MartyMurray
Lauren wants to assemble a collection of books with fish-themed titles by shopping at her local bookstore. On the bookstore's website, she searched for the keyword fish. The search returned only the results shown in the table. From the copies in stock included in the search results, Lauren purchased 4 books with distinct titles from 4 different sections with an average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00.

TitleAuthorFormatSectionCopies
in stock
Price
Curious George at
the Aquarium
Rey,
Margaret
used
hardcover
children's1$3.99
Curious George
Goes Fishing
Rey, H. A.new
hardcover
children's3$2.98
EelsProsek,
James
new
hardcover
science1$25.99
FishBittman,
Mark
used
hardcover
cooking2$11.00
FishBittman,
Mark
new
paperback
cooking4$9.98
Float-fishing
Strategies
Streeks,
E. Neale
new
paperback
outdoors0$19.95
SalmonMorgan,
Diane
new
paperback
cooking2$9.98
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amyused
paperback
literature6$2.63
Saving Fish
from Drowning
Tan, Amynew
paperback
literature1$7.98

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true about the purchase that Lauren made. Otherwise, select No.


This question emphasizes the constraints aspect of Data Insights. So, while a little sorting of the table helps with answering this question, answering this Table Analysis question works much like answering a typical Two-Part Analysis question that involves multiple constraints that we must consider.

The constraints presented by the passage are the following:

4 books

Distinct titles

From 4 different sections

An average (arithmetic mean) price of more than $12.00

Also, we have to be careful not to miss the fact that the books she purchases were "in stock" and "included in the search results."

With those constraints in mind, let's consider the statements to see which ones are supported by the provided information.

Lauren purchased a new book.

Since the passage says that she purchased books "in stock" from "4 different sections," to see whether this statement is supported, let's see whether she can purchase in stock books from 4 different sections without purchasing a new book.

Sorting by section, we see that there are 5 sections: children's, cooking, literature, outdoors, and science.

Now, one key move can save us a lot of time and trouble, and that move is to notice that the number of copies in stock of the only outdoors book is 0. So, we know for sure that Lauren did not purchase an outdoors book.

So, she has just the other four sections to choose from.

Now, scanning the Format column, we see that the only science book is a "new hardcover." So, since Lauren purchased books from "4 different sections" and thus must have purchased a science book, we know that she purchased a new book.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased a book from the cooking section.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the cooking section.

Select Yes.

Lauren purchased Eels.

As discussed above, there are 5 sections, but there are no outdoors books in stock. So, to purchase books from 4 different sections, Lauren must have purchased a book from each of the 4 sections other than outdoors.

Thus, the provided information indicates that Lauren must have purchased a book from the science section.


The only book in the science section is Eels. So, Lauren must have purchased Eels.

Another way we can confirm that she purchased Eels is to determine that the arithmetic mean of the books Lauren purchased could not have been over $12.00 if she had not purchased Eels as follows.

Taking the highest priced book from each of the 4 sections other than science, we get the following 4 prices.

Children's: 3.99

Cooking: 11:00

Literature: 7.98

Outdoors: 19.95

Adding up those prices, we see that they add up to approximately $43.

Since 43/4 < 12, we know that Lauren must have bought a higher priced book, and the only such book is Eels. So, she must have bought Eels.

Of course, none of that work is necessary since we know that there are no outdoors books in stock. So, Lauren must have bought the only science book, Eels. Still, it's a little interesting to see that they gave us two paths to the correct answer for the third statement.

Select Yes.

Correct answer: Yes, Yes, Yes
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts