GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 11:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 546
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 Jul 2017, 02:38
2
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (00:55) correct 38% (01:15) wrong based on 233 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.

A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established

Originally posted by nocilis on 28 Jan 2005, 22:51.
Last edited by abhimahna on 06 Jul 2017, 02:38, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA
Most Helpful Community Reply
4 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4244
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2005, 23:24
4
1
C it is
A and B miss verb to make first half a clause
D) "that was as early as" is not english :)
E) misplaced modifier problem. Is it the "mineral extraction" or the "method which is "well-established"?

C) has correct verb-tense agreement and makes "well-established" adjective of proper noun "method"
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

General Discussion
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2184
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2005, 23:25
1
1
A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
"it" is wrong
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
missing a verb
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction
sounds good
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
Sounds like the mineral was as early as 18 century
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established
The comma before "well" is wrong.

I would choose (C) for this one.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2004
Posts: 43
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2005, 23:44
Just wanted to know that if one of the option be this

F. had been a well-established method of mineral extraction

Would it be right? I think the "had been" in option E is also wrong.... but why?

Ketan
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1456
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2005, 00:37
ketanm wrote:
Just wanted to know that if one of the option be this

F. had been a well-established method of mineral extraction

Would it be right? I think the "had been" in option E is also wrong.... but why?

Ketan


i also want o add one more..... hahaha
(G) there are only 5 choice answers in GMAT and we have to choose the best from the available and it may not be the standard form of english...... :lol:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2184
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2005, 00:47
ketanm wrote:
Just wanted to know that if one of the option be this

F. had been a well-established method of mineral extraction

Would it be right? I think the "had been" in option E is also wrong.... but why?

Ketan


Good question. Had this option been one of the choices, I would very well have chosen it. (I used correct grammar didn't I? :D)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 546
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2005, 01:13
I think
was a well-established method of mineral extraction
sounds good


is preferrable over

had been a well-established method of mineral extraction

A simple past tense is prefered over past-perfect here, as we are not talking about two things happening, one after the other (or are we?).
Experts?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 21
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2005, 02:13
was a well-established method of mineral extraction

Concise and correct. My vote for C.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2014
Posts: 1
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40
Reviews Badge
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2015, 21:44
HongHu wrote:
A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
"it" is wrong
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
missing a verb
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction
sounds good
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
Sounds like the mineral was as early as 18 century
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established
The comma before "well" is wrong.

I would choose (C) for this one.



Can i know why "it" is wrong in choice A??
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 277
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2015, 22:14
C for me too. Please post the OA.

Thanks for a good question.

nocilis wrote:
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.

A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established

Explain your answer in detail pl.

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 97
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2016, 08:23
Excellent Explanation Paul..
Thanks..

Paul wrote:
C it is
A and B miss verb to make first half a clause
D) "that was as early as" is not english :)
E) misplaced modifier problem. Is it the "mineral extraction" or the "method which is "well-established"?

C) has correct verb-tense agreement and makes "well-established" adjective of proper noun "method"
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1106
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2017, 20:10
Hi Experts,
Why is had been incorrect vs was in D vs C?
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 4
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2017, 23:47
IMO E is the correct answer. In option C, well established modifies method of extraction. Therefore, 'as early as 18th century' is meaningless.

According to me, the method was well established as early as 18th century. In option E, well established modifies method of extraction correctly.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
Expert Post
Top Contributor
3 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4471
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2017, 10:47
3
Top Contributor
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago, miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.

A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established ---'leaching and it' makes it an error of double subjecting with a single verb
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established -- This is a fragment.
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction ---correct choice
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was ---that refers to mineral and not to extracting mineral
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established -- if leaching had been a well-established method as early as 18th century, what happened to the method after the specified timeline? 'Had been' can be used only if the method ceased to be well established after the 18th century.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 661
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2017, 22:54
1
Here is the sentence structure of this sentence:
Clause 1: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals,
Clause 2: it was well established as early as the eighteenth century,
Clause 3: but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize
Clause 4: that bacteria took an active part in the process.

Clause 1 does not have any verb. The subject “leaching” does not have any verb. Thus this sentence is a fragment. In addition, clause 2 is not connected appropriately to clause 1. It should be connected using a ; or ,FANBOYS.


Process of Elimination :-

Choice A - 'leaching and it' makes it an error of double subjecting with a single verb
Choice B – Fragment Error: This choice changes clause 2 into a modifier. But it does not address the absence of verb for the subject “leaching”.
Choice C – No errors.
Choice D – Modifier error: The sentence implies that well-established method of mineral extraction was as early as 18th century. This is non-sensical – saying that a method was as early as 18th century. It would have made sense if this said that the method existed as early as 18th century. This error may be construed as SV-Make sense error – the subject – “well established method” does not make sense with the verb – “was”.
Choice E – Verb error: This choice states uses past perfect tense for the verb – had been. This changes the intended meaning of the sentence. This sentence now implies that leaching is no longer a method of mineral extraction. In the light of this information, what follows does not make sense. Since this is no longer a method of mineral extraction, the fact miners realized its working 25 years back becomes invalid. Thus, because this sentences uses past perfect tense as shown, it distorts the intended meaning of the sentence.
Thus, the correct answer is Choice C.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 661
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2017, 22:59
Here is the sentence structure of this sentence:
Clause 1: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals,
Clause 2: it was well established as early as the eighteenth century,
Clause 3: but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize
Clause 4: that bacteria took an active part in the process.

Clause 1 does not have any verb. The subject “leaching” does not have any verb. Thus this sentence is a fragment. In addition, clause 2 is not connected appropriately to clause 1. It should be connected using a ; or ,FANBOYS.


Process of Elimination :-

Choice A - 'leaching and it' makes it an error of double subjecting with a single verb
Choice B – Fragment Error: This choice changes clause 2 into a modifier. But it does not address the absence of verb for the subject “leaching”.
Choice C – No errors.
Choice D – Modifier error: The sentence implies that well-established method of mineral extraction was as early as 18th century. This is non-sensical – saying that a method was as early as 18th century. It would have made sense if this said that the method existed as early as 18th century. This error may be construed as SV-Make sense error – the subject – “well established method” does not make sense with the verb – “was”.
Choice E – Verb error: This choice states uses past perfect tense for the verb – had been. This changes the intended meaning of the sentence. This sentence now implies that leaching is no longer a method of mineral extraction. In the light of this information, what follows does not make sense. Since this is no longer a method of mineral extraction, the fact miners realized its working 25 years back becomes invalid. Thus, because this sentences uses past perfect tense as shown, it distorts the intended meaning of the sentence.
Thus, the correct answer is Choice C.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 27
Location: Austria
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.54
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2017, 13:23
Paul wrote:
C it is
A and B miss verb to make first half a clause
D) "that was as early as" is not english :)
E) misplaced modifier problem. Is it the "mineral extraction" or the "method which is "well-established"?

C) has correct verb-tense agreement and makes "well-established" adjective of proper noun "method"


Actually, for your explanation for E to be valid wouldn't you need no comma before the modifier?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 345
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 03:15
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.

A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction

D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
--> when we have V-ing, check if there is a sensible doer of this V-ing. In this sentence, i cannot find any sensible doer for extracting.

E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established
--> V-ed modifier , well established can not jump over preceding noun mineral extraction to modify a method . Only that, which modifier can jump if sentence context allows so (no ambiguity and essential phrase)
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 345
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 03:39
Hi daagh , egmat

D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was

Let's ignore the illogical meaning problem in the phrase method of extracting mineral that was as early as the eighteenth century. Can that in D jump over preposition phrase of extracting mineral to modify a method (of extracting mineral is an essential modifier and can not be placed elsewhere)?

Many thanks for your help ;)
_________________

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee

Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of &nbs [#permalink] 11 Sep 2017, 03:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.