Official Explanation:- LED bulbs are more energy-efficient than traditional bulbs.
Both Leo and Samantha acknowledge that LED bulbs are more energy-efficient than traditional bulbs. Leo emphasizes how switching to LEDs reduces energy consumption, while Samantha explicitly mentions that LEDs are more energy-efficient.
Therefore, they both agree with this statement.
- LED bulbs are cheaper to purchase than traditional bulbs.
Leo does not mention the cost to purchase LED bulbs, while only talking about the cheaper operating costs associated with LED bulbs.
Samantha disagrees with this statement.
This cannot be the right answer.
- Many countries can experience significant benefits from adopting LED lighting.
Leo suggests that the energy efficiency benefits of LED bulbs have been widely recognized, pointing out Germany’s success with them. Samantha, on the other hand, argues that the same level of success may not be possible in all countries due to differences in energy needs and economic conditions.
Therefore, they disagree about this statement.
- LED bulbs are a perfect solution for all types of lighting needs.
Leo does not talk about this.
Samantha disagrees with this statement- "While LED bulbs are more energy-efficient than traditional bulbs, they are not the perfect solution for all lighting needs."
This cannot be the right answer.
- The light quality of LED bulbs is always superior to that of traditional bulbs.
Leo does not talk about this.
Samantha disagrees with this statement- " their light quality can vary significantly compared to traditional bulbs."
This cannot be the right answer.