Last visit was: 08 Nov 2024, 16:25 It is currently 08 Nov 2024, 16:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 96,667
Own Kudos:
675,143
 [3]
Given Kudos: 87,972
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,667
Kudos: 675,143
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PranavVyas
Joined: 13 Aug 2020
Last visit: 02 Nov 2024
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
102
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 540 Q15 V29
Posts: 108
Kudos: 102
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
LamboWalker
Joined: 06 Jun 2021
Last visit: 06 Nov 2024
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
451
 [1]
Given Kudos: 302
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q86 V81 DI83
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q86 V81 DI83
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 255
Kudos: 451
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 96,667
Own Kudos:
675,143
 [1]
Given Kudos: 87,972
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,667
Kudos: 675,143
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Local visitors to nature reserves in South Africa often complain that foreign tourists on guided tours, despite their inexperience and lack of knowledge, manage to see rare animals more often than they do. Unlike in a zoo, the animals wander around to their hearts' content in a huge natural area, and there is never any guarantee that a visitor to such a reserve will see a specific type of animal. Although it is believed that the success of the foreign tourists is a result of "beginner's luck", what could actually explain this phenomenon is the fact that __________.

Which of the following best completes the passage below?


(A) the numbers of animals in the various nature reserves have increased in recent years due to adequate rains

Incorrect.

This is a "Complete the Argument" format question. The missing argument part follows the phrase what could actually explain this phenomenon... so its role is to explain contradicting premises. Therefore, this is a Paradox question:

Premise A: South African visitors to nature reserves complain that tourists on guided tours see rare animals more often than they do

Premise B: it is not that easy to see certain animals in such a reserve, and tourists lack any knowledge in this field
+
Premise C: it is believed that the tourists have "beginner's luck" but actually...

Resolving Premise: ?

This answer choice cannot explain the paradox and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. If there are more animals in the nature reserves than it should be easier for local visitors and tourists to see them, but still only the tourists see them.


(B) there is no communication between foreign tourists and local visitors to the park

Incorrect.

This is a "Complete the Argument" format question. The missing argument part follows the phrase what could actually explain this phenomenon... so its role is to explain contradicting premises. Therefore, this is a Paradox question:

Premise A: South African visitors to nature reserves complain that tourists on guided tours see rare animals more often than they do

Premise B: it is not that easy to see certain animals in such a reserve, and tourists lack any knowledge in this field
+
Premise C: it is believed that the tourists have "beginner's luck" but actually...

Resolving Premise: ?

This answer contradicts one of the premises and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. If tourists and local visitors did not communicate, how would locals know how many rare animals the tourists saw?


(C) the tours offered to foreign tourists are guided by people with more experience than the average local visitor

This answer choice logically resolves the paradox and completes the argument. If the tour guides are more knowledgeable than the average local visitor, it makes sense that they would be more successful at locating the rare animals and that their group of tourists will see more rare animals.

(D) rarely seen animals are usually those that are either nocturnal or vulnerable to attacks by predators

Incorrect.

This answer choice fails to resolve the paradox and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. More details about which types of animals are considered rare does not help explain why tourists see more of them than locals.


(E) the foreign tourists take courses in their own countries prior to the tours, and thereby gain extra knowledge for the efficient classification of animals

Incorrect.

Since it explains the tourists' classification skills, this answer choice could explain how tourists recognize rare animals when they see them. However, it fails to explain the paradox at hand which is - why do tourists see more rare animals than locals? Therefore, it cannot logically complete the argument.
User avatar
jack5397
Joined: 13 Sep 2020
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 277
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q79 V79 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 575 Q80 V81 DI75
GMAT Focus 3: 635 Q82 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 460 Q36 V18 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q79 V79 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 575 Q80 V81 DI75
GMAT Focus 3: 635 Q82 V83 DI79
GMAT 1: 460 Q36 V18 (Online)
Posts: 164
Kudos: 315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO - C

Option C justifies the discrepancy between local visitor and foreign visitor experience.
User avatar
Madhvendrasinh
Joined: 01 Feb 2024
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 201
Products:
Posts: 110
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Local visitors to nature reserves in South Africa often complain that foreign tourists on guided tours, despite their inexperience and lack of knowledge, manage to see rare animals more often than they do. Unlike in a zoo, the animals wander around to their hearts' content in a huge natural area, and there is never any guarantee that a visitor to such a reserve will see a specific type of animal. Although it is believed that the success of the foreign tourists is a result of "beginner's luck", what could actually explain this phenomenon is the fact that __________.

Which of the following best completes the passage below?


(A) the numbers of animals in the various nature reserves have increased in recent years due to adequate rains

Incorrect.

This is a "Complete the Argument" format question. The missing argument part follows the phrase what could actually explain this phenomenon... so its role is to explain contradicting premises. Therefore, this is a Paradox question:

Premise A: South African visitors to nature reserves complain that tourists on guided tours see rare animals more often than they do

Premise B: it is not that easy to see certain animals in such a reserve, and tourists lack any knowledge in this field
+
Premise C: it is believed that the tourists have "beginner's luck" but actually...

Resolving Premise: ?

This answer choice cannot explain the paradox and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. If there are more animals in the nature reserves than it should be easier for local visitors and tourists to see them, but still only the tourists see them.


(B) there is no communication between foreign tourists and local visitors to the park

Incorrect.

This is a "Complete the Argument" format question. The missing argument part follows the phrase what could actually explain this phenomenon... so its role is to explain contradicting premises. Therefore, this is a Paradox question:

Premise A: South African visitors to nature reserves complain that tourists on guided tours see rare animals more often than they do

Premise B: it is not that easy to see certain animals in such a reserve, and tourists lack any knowledge in this field
+
Premise C: it is believed that the tourists have "beginner's luck" but actually...

Resolving Premise: ?

This answer contradicts one of the premises and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. If tourists and local visitors did not communicate, how would locals know how many rare animals the tourists saw?


(C) the tours offered to foreign tourists are guided by people with more experience than the average local visitor

This answer choice logically resolves the paradox and completes the argument. If the tour guides are more knowledgeable than the average local visitor, it makes sense that they would be more successful at locating the rare animals and that their group of tourists will see more rare animals.

(D) rarely seen animals are usually those that are either nocturnal or vulnerable to attacks by predators

Incorrect.

This answer choice fails to resolve the paradox and therefore cannot logically complete the argument. More details about which types of animals are considered rare does not help explain why tourists see more of them than locals.


(E) the foreign tourists take courses in their own countries prior to the tours, and thereby gain extra knowledge for the efficient classification of animals

Incorrect.

Since it explains the tourists' classification skills, this answer choice could explain how tourists recognize rare animals when they see them. However, it fails to explain the paradox at hand which is - why do tourists see more rare animals than locals? Therefore, it cannot logically complete the argument.
­Bunuel can you please explain why do we consider it beginner's luck even when foreigners have found the more experinced local. i mean there is no role of luck in actually spotting the rarely seen animals. Bunuel MartyMurray
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7112 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts