It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 15:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1886

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2009, 19:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2009, 19:57
IMO B

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed -->animal species endangered are out of scope
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly -->the best: it weakens the argument that manufacturing from material of old grown trees can reduce the release of carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, organic matter from old growth trees, when made into products, decomposes rapidly and thereby, releasing carbon dioxide
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species -->counter fact
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose -->too general
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests -->irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2009, 21:03
I'll go with C

The stem says that " harvesting trees from old growth forests will reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere" and the reasoning is - "the young trees will have more capacity to absorb CO2 than do the old trees"

C counters the above fact by saying that " the young trees have less than half of the amount of CO2 that old trees have"

Hence C weakens the argument

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 5

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2009, 05:06
I will aldo go For C. B and D lures us by contadicting the evidence but C attacks the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2009, 05:24
tkarthi4u wrote:
I will aldo go For C. B and D lures us by contadicting the evidence but C attacks the conclusion.

The argument here is: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

The final sentence is just another premise helps to reach to the argument: Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests --> help to emphasize the argument that Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 2

Location: nj
Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2009, 08:04
I agree with B on this.

It directly counter the conclusion by saying that the products of that manufacturing process decompose rapidly (and hence releasing CO2) so harvesting the trees for manufacturing is not a good idea.

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 2

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1886

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: Old-growth forests [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2009, 03:49

Kudos [?]: 1396 [0], given: 1

Re: Old-growth forests   [#permalink] 23 May 2009, 03:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.